Jump to content

Those who wanted Vijay/rahul over Dhawan - Time to eat a crow


Khota

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Khota said:

Some people have no clue about sports. They have not done anything at high level. They dont know how things get executed at highest level. If I have to point at one person who was the worst so far it has been Vijay. Dont look at cricket stats as they are done incorrectly. Scratch the surface and see what it reveals.

Dhawan > Vijay and Rahul.

 

Time permitting I will post recipes for making crow. I am rushed right now.

 

Quote

 

Some people have no clue about sports.

 

 

Agree.

 

 

Quote

Dhawan > Vijay and Rahul

 

Some people have no clue about sports.

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, philcric said:

 

 

Agree.

 

 

 

Some people have no clue about sports.

 

Some people think getting their asses handed on a platter is funny.

Edited by Khota
Posted
8 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

This aint an easy pitch to bat for openers, dhawan wud have been worst. 

No matter currently vijay n rahul are ur better option and they have to backed, whereas dhawan shud be kept back in delhi

 

5 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

This series was very tough for openers. Top class bowling attack in helpful conditions.  

This is all you got. Pathetic.

Posted
2 hours ago, Khota said:

 

This is all you got. Pathetic.

what have u got a defense of 16 runs which is also a failure, past record also a failure

dikha kya rha hai 16 run 

Atleast vijay ka technique hai, past record hai.....1 credential hai 

Posted
4 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

what have u got a defense of 16 runs which is also a failure, past record also a failure

dikha kya rha hai 16 run 

Atleast vijay ka technique hai, past record hai.....1 credential hai 

Magar mere bhai run nahin hain.

Posted

Dhawan failed in 2/2 innings, success rate is 0%

Vijay failed in 4.5/5 innings, success rate is 10%

 

so vijay > dhawan..

 

damn, i love making such logic.. its so easy and no need too much thinking:aha:

Posted

These series has exposed all three openers. All of thee have been like Fish out of water. England think tank would be looking at this struggle by our 3 openers. They will certainly look to exploit the fact that our 3 openers cannot bat in certain conditions. If they roll out patas then the same Dhawans, Vijays and Rahuls will score tons like they do on batsman friendly wickets in India.

 

The average of all 3 openers in England will depend upon what types of wickets are served.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Detonator said:

Dhawan failed in 2/2 innings, success rate is 0%

Vijay failed in 4.5/5 innings, success rate is 10%

 

so vijay > dhawan..

 

damn, i love making such logic.. its so easy and no need too much thinking:aha:

You do manufacture logic as you go along.

Posted
5 hours ago, Khota said:

Magar mere bhai run nahin hain.

run to dhawan ke bhi nhin, 16 run kabse acha perfomance ho gaya

Thats what m saying agreed vijay failed, but 16 runs is also a failure . Both have failed but atleas vijay has a history n technique so no doubt he ll be backed n he shud be 

Posted
5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

run to dhawan ke bhi nhin, 16 run kabse acha perfomance ho gaya

Thats what m saying agreed vijay failed, but 16 runs is also a failure . Both have failed but atleas vijay has a history n technique so no doubt he ll be backed n he shud be 

Fundamentally I cannot disagree with you. Both failed. What I was trying to say which I do belive in my heart is that Dhawan is better than Vijay. We can disagree about that and still have friendly banter. Let us move on.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Khota said:

Fundamentally I cannot disagree with you. Both failed. What I was trying to say which I do belive in my heart is that Dhawan is better than Vijay. We can disagree about that and still have friendly banter. Let us move on.

Dhawan is not a good leaver! Vijay is.....well was. On a helpful track Dhawan is most likely to nick one to the slips. If not that then they will bounce him out. 

 

The issue now is because India is switching regularly between 3 openers, none of them are confident right now.

Posted
11 minutes ago, jusarrived said:

By that logic I guess it also proves that Rohit should be playing ahead of Rahane , since Rahane failed in the first innings ? 

Rahane, Dhawan and Rohit in my mind are abt the same. But they are top 5 bats for India.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Khota said:

Rahane, Dhawan and Rohit in my mind are abt the same. But they are top 5 bats for India.

Sure why not , unfortunately though the games are not played in your mind where Sharma and Dhawan could be scoring double hundreds in a session 

Posted
2 hours ago, Khota said:

Rahane, Dhawan and Rohit in my mind are abt the same. But they are top 5 bats for India.

The guy is a good Test bat the other two are lol.

Posted
11 hours ago, Pollack said:

Surely Rahane has been bad recently. But it's an insult to say Rahane, Dhawan and Rohit are about the same level. Rahane might as well want to retire after hearing it.

I just dont see it that way.

Posted
10 hours ago, Vilander said:

The guy is a good Test bat the other two are lol.

Other two are not bad either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...