zen Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 More frustratation - Ind is doing badly and Pandya is doing relatively well Frustrated 1 Link to comment
sandeep Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 38 minutes ago, zen said: More frustratation - Ind is doing badly and Pandya is doing relatively well 2 edged boundaries off of Pandya, and scorecard fans will cluelessly post a few hours later about Pandya 'leaking' runs. zen and asterix 1 1 Link to comment
zen Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 8 minutes ago, sandeep said: 2 edged boundaries off of Pandya, and scorecard fans will cluelessly post a few hours later about Pandya 'leaking' runs. For these manipulative fans, Pandya is definitely leaking runs even though: ov) BOWLING O M R W ECON I Sharma 8 1 37 1 4.62 Mohammed Shami 10.4 3 43 2 4.03 Kuldeep Yadav 4 1 15 0 3.75 HH Pandya 7 0 22 1 3.14 asterix 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 Pandya showed he can bowl. I want Kohli to give to give him more responsibility as a bowler. sandeep 1 Link to comment
zen Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 may be it is time to close this thread UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
tweaker Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 Pandya gets Bairstov UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 Manju- i felt before this game is not for test level Ganguly to manju- i dnt agree to that, he has pace n movement. He is a batting all rounder jst needs to be careful regd his shot selection Ab log kahenge ganguly bhi pandya ka PR hia Adi BB, UrmiSinhaRay and express bowling 1 2 Link to comment
zen Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 BOWLING O M R W ECON WD NB I Sharma 19 3 88 1 4.63 0 0 Mohammed Shami 19 4 74 3 3.89 0 1 Kuldeep Yadav 9 1 44 0 4.88 0 0 HH Pandya 17 0 66 2 3.88 1 0 R Ashwin 17 1 68 0 4.00 0 0 Link to comment
asterix Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 ^ certainly better than Ishant Sharma in this match...Good thing is that the pace brigade will be off his back now as they’ll target Kuldeep. And that’s what they should’ve done right from the beginning as Kullu was selected in place of Yaddu... Link to comment
zen Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 1 minute ago, asterix said: ^ certainly better than Ishant Sharma in this match... Good thing is that the pace brigade will be off his back now as they’ll target Kuldeep. And that’s what they should’ve done right from the beginning as Kullu was selected in place of Yaddu... As I mentioned on one of the threads, we have bigger problems to worry about than Pandya. We should start out with picking the 5 best batsmen, 4 best bowlers + the best WK option based on conditions. If these specialist slots are not optimized, there is no point in bothering about Pandya's slot, which actually lends balance to the 11 Here too, he picked up the game with 3 of the 4 specialist bowlers not performing. In fact, his effectiveness in terms of SR is close to Shami's .... Shami and Pandya have been our best bowlers today Ankit_sharma03, philcric, diehardpacer and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment
express bowling Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, asterix said: Good thing is that the pace brigade will be off his back now as they’ll target Kuldeep. And that’s what they should’ve done right from the beginning as Kullu was selected in place of Yaddu... Most of the pace brigade strongly support both Kuldeep and Hardik. tweaker and Mosher 2 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 1 minute ago, zen said: As I mentioned on one of the threads, we have bigger problems to worry about than Pandya. We should start out with picking the 5 best batsmen, 4 best bowlers + the best WK option based on conditions. If these specialist slots are not optimized, there is no point in bothering about Pandya's slot, which actually lends balance to the 11 Here too, he picked up the game with 3 of the 4 specialist bowlers not performing. In fact, his effectiveness in terms of SR is close to Shami's .... Shami and Pandya have been our best bowlers today once ur specialist start to perform, pandya will start to look like a gr8 strength to this side philcric and zen 2 Link to comment
zen Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 (edited) I am happy that Kuldeep played as I don't think that the inclusion of Yadav could have made a dramatic difference. I don't have huge confidence in Ashwin and Jadeja in these conditions. Looking at the future, Kuldeep can be developed as a spinner who can chip in most conditions and can be destructive in conditions that favor him. This will be a good learning experience for him .... I started a thread where I discussed Ind's tour to Down Under in 91-92. There Shane Warne went for a lot in his first test. As long as Kuldeep can come back strongly, it is ok Edited August 11, 2018 by zen Adi BB, Sgattick10 and UrmiSinhaRay 2 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 9 hours ago, zen said: I am happy that Kuldeep played as I don't think that the inclusion of Yadav could have made a dramatic difference. I don't have huge confidence in Ashwin and Jadeja in these conditions. Looking at the future, Kuldeep can be developed as a spinner who can chip in most conditions and can be destructive in conditions that favor him. This will be a good learning experience for him .... I started a thread where I discussed Ind's tour to Down Under in 91-92. There Shane Warne went for a lot in his first test. As long as Kuldeep can come back strongly, it is ok Yadav could easily have picked 1-2 wickets especially he troubles woakes. 130/5 to 350 is criminal. This seemed like NZ 2013-14 redux. Switchblade and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 Link to comment
Lannister Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 He is not at the level of Stokes, Woakes and Curran, and he's certainly not a third pace bowler. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Lannister said: He is not at the level of Stokes, Woakes and Curran, and he's certainly not a third pace bowler. Woakes and Curran are bowling alrounders like BK. sscomp32, UrmiSinhaRay and Switchblade 1 1 1 Link to comment
Lannister Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 15 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Woakes and Curran are bowling alrounders like BK. Yeah, I forgot about that. So why are they scoring more runs than our batting all-rounder. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Clarke Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Lannister said: Yeah, I forgot about that. So why are they scoring more runs than our batting all-rounder. Home vs away conditions. Pandya has the ability to hammer bowlers to oblivion in India/SC. Over there these bowling all rounders like Curran & Woakes will struggle with both bat & ball. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Lannister said: Yeah, I forgot about that. So why are they scoring more runs than our batting all-rounder. They are playing at home and not facing anderson and broad. When England were in India, our bowling alrounder Jayant Yadav scored a 100 against them. Their alrounder Stokes did zilch. And you are forgetting conditions. India batted in completely different conditions. Switchblade, beetle and sscomp32 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now