ravishingravi Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 3 minutes ago, Lannister said: That doesn't make any sense. If they are voting for a better party, why are they still living in slums and thousands of Bihari students are migrating to Karnataka for better education. Truth is India is complicated. To fit it in narratives is difficult. To get the pulse you have to be on ground. RSS has the figure on that pulse.
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: People are the sole factor of a democratic process. Not when there are many culturally different states representing the country.
Turning_track Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Lannister said: Population shouldn't be the sole factor. There's a reason Bihar is languishing at the bottom when it comes to development. It is the reflection of their people and the state of affairs over there. What's the point of this election when 70-80% of seats were alloted to Hindi belts. A state like Mizoram has only 2 seats alloted vs 80 seats for UP. This is a phucking joke. Out of 543 LS seats, 70-80% of seats are alloted to Hindi belts? And how is the comparison of Mizoram justified with the most populated state of India? First, population is considered as the vital factor. Secondly whenever census is conducted, then the Delimitation commission demarcates the boundaries to make sure the constituency doesn't lie between 2 states. Population density, total area of that constituency also matters & then the central govt. has to decide whether to increase the number of Lok Sabha seats or not. Even people of Rajasthan could argue why they have to settle with 23 seats while TN has got 39 seats despite almost similar numbers in population. Edited May 23, 2019 by Turning_track Gollum 1
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 7 minutes ago, Suhaan said: They are slowly coming out of that Stone Age,but mind you Bihar leads the chart in giving maximum number of IAS to the country,they are not absolutely slum dwellers as you have stated That just shows how phucked up the procedures are when it comes to government jobs. Non-Hindi speakers are at a severe disadvantage as they cannot serve in their native tongue.
randomGuy Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, Lannister said: That doesn't make any sense. If they are voting for a better party, why are they still living in slums and thousands of Bihari students are migrating to Karnataka for better education. Give bjp a decent go and see Bihar UP competing with Turkey, Russia etc....off the tangent, but karnataka economy benefits equally from people migrating there (good weather is big factor in case of Bangalore)...any way, karnataka has voted for the same party as Bihar. Go home. Suhaan, Gollum, beetle and 1 other 4
Muloghonto Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 4 minutes ago, Lannister said: Not when there are many culturally different states representing the country. False. Cultural distinctness is irrelevant to the democratic process. Your language or food shouldn't get you any extra or less vote than another culture in the same country. Sgattick10, Gollum, Clarke and 1 other 4
Muloghonto Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 2 minutes ago, Lannister said: That just shows how phucked up the procedures are when it comes to government jobs. Non-Hindi speakers are at a severe disadvantage as they cannot serve in their native tongue. Pfft. Serving in my native bengali is absent in Karnataka as well. You are simply showing the fact that you are uncomfortable living as the minor but distinct partner to the hindistani culture. Perhaps because you've had more culturally illustrious buffers from the hindi speakers, but its not as doom and gloom as you think it is, to so-called cultural integrity, owing to just being close to hindi belt either. beetle and Sgattick10 2
Suhaan Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 2 minutes ago, Lannister said: That just shows how phucked up the procedures are when it comes to government jobs. Non-Hindi speakers are at a severe disadvantage as they cannot serve in their native tongue. Don't know brother who has stopped them to express themselves or write their papers in English?Does it matter, really? DHONI_FANN, beetle and Laaloo 3
Straight Drive Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 INC getting sidelined in the power game (1) Two successive LS polls lost by huge margins. (2) Lack of a leader in INC acceptable to the people of India. (3) With INC manging to win just around 54 seats, it is being severly sidelined by the voters of India and it could fall steeply in the power game.
beetle Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 49 minutes ago, Lannister said: What's the point of this election when 70-80% of seats were alloted to Hindi belts. A state like Mizoram has only 2 seats alloted vs 80 seats for UP. This is a phucking joke. Election is about people not regions.
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 20 minutes ago, Turning_track said: First, population is considered as the vital factor. Secondly whenever census is conducted, then the Delimitation commission demarcates the boundaries to make sure the constituency doesn't lie between 2 states. Population density, total area of that constituency also matters & then the central govt. has to decide whether to increase the number of Lok Sabha seats or not. Even people of Rajasthan could argue why they have to settle with 23 seats while TN has got 39 seats despite almost similar numbers in population. So if Muslim community decides to increase their breeding rate, do you agree if they get more seats at the constitution?
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 23 minutes ago, randomGuy said: Give bjp a decent go and see Bihar UP competing with Turkey, Russia etc.... Huh? Their current state of affairs tells that they don't deserve 40 constitutional seats. It's just that they breed at a higher rate shouldn't be the sole factor. Stan AF 1
Turning_track Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 7 minutes ago, Lannister said: So if Muslim community decides to increase their breeding rate, do you agree if they get more seats at the constitution? The breeding rate of M-community in WB is already high, add the influx of Bangladeshis as well. Their representation in Lok Sabha is exactly the same which was five decades back.
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 10 minutes ago, beetle said: Election is about people not regions. Wrong, people are the representation of their culture and language in a country like India. Stan AF 1
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 25 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Don't know brother who has stopped them to express themselves or write their papers in English?Does it matter, really? They have every right to express in their native tongues, just like how Hindi speakers are doing.
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 33 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: False. Cultural distinctness is irrelevant to the democratic process. Your language or food shouldn't get you any extra or less vote than another culture in the same country. Culture and languages were the sole criteria how states were formed. So each state should get fair share of representation at the constituency.
Austin 3:!6 Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 Kaisa dhoya @ProudLiberal velu, Gollum, sergio04 and 3 others 6
Lannister Posted May 23, 2019 Posted May 23, 2019 Shame on Congress. The Gandhi family is a thorn to their side and this will be their demise if they don't act upon it. Stan AF, beetle and Gollum 3
Recommended Posts