Jump to content

Let's all laugh at ourselves


ganeshran

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

We shouldn't look for bowlers who can bat

We should look for bowlers who can bowl

We have one,

why not play him instead of this legend?

No you cannot build any team with 4 number XI bowlers even if they are Glen Mcgraths.Thakur will always be in the mix due to his ability with bat.

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Khota said:

Bowler means someone who can bowl. Clearly batting was not the issue over here as there were plenty of runs on board. 

Bowlerrs who can bowl i.e. specialized strike bowlers.

Yes even Shami went for runs as was the case with Kuldeep(Kuldeep is really down)but Shami has also taken wickets upfront and turned matches upside down in several occasions but Shardul has normally gone for plenty in every match ,teams wait for his turn to feast on big

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, putrevus said:

No you cannot build any team with 4 number XI bowlers even if they are Glen Mcgraths.Thakur will always be in the mix due to his ability with bat.

Thats your logic,on a placid wicket you will have top batters taking the limelight

You don't need no8 or 9 for batting

While defending a target you need proper bowlers to make a match out of it

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Yes even Shami went for runs as was the case with Kuldeep(Kuldeep is really down)but Shami has also taken wickets upfront and turned matches upside down in several occasions but Shardul has normally gone for plenty in every match ,teams wait for his turn to feast on big

Shardul's average is 47. Enough said.

Link to comment
32 minutes ago, putrevus said:

No you cannot build any team with 4 number XI bowlers even if they are Glen Mcgraths.Thakur will always be in the mix due to his ability with bat.

we cant also make a team in which 2 out of 5 bowlers dont take wkt. We are only left with 3 bowlers + half half bowlers at cost of some batting which will come in play once in 20 games that to for 20-25 runs which wont be sufficient on every occasion . If 20/25 game ratio is taken ...in that ratio once in while even slogs from shmi, saini, kuldeep will come through

 

Jadeja is ineffective

Thakur is ineffective n expense 

We dont even have 6th bowling option

Plus our fielding is also leaking runs 

 

A bowling attack with so many punctures 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Thats your logic,on a placid wicket you will have top batters taking the limelight

You don't need no8 or 9 for batting

While defending a target you need proper bowlers to make a match out of it

We did not play  5 Thakurs, we played 4 frontline bowlers on a ground where scoring is very easy. Your assumption that Saini somehow would have won this match is wrong. Nobody stopped Bumrah, Shami or Kuldeep from taking wickets.

 

There is always a balance needed when building a team, when the frontline bowlers are total mugs with bat , you have to resort to bits and pieces players for balance.Kulcha was broken up for same reason.

 

 

Link to comment
56 minutes ago, putrevus said:

He does not look mediocre, he is mediocre bowler that is why he has played just 9 odis. We should look for bowlers who can bat  but who are those bowlers.

What are the highest scores of Shami and Kuldeep in odis?

In ideal scenario you don't want Jadeja also in the team. Do we have any bowlers who can bat?

Shami highest score is 25 more than thakur . Did you check Thakur bowlines avg 51:pray:. Even bng & zim have Better bowler. He is proper medicore 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, putrevus said:

We did not play  5 Thakurs, we played 4 frontline bowlers on a ground where scoring is very easy. Your assumption that Saini somehow would have won this match is wrong. Nobody stopped Bumrah, Shami or Kuldeep from taking wickets.

 

There is always a balance needed when building a team, when the frontline bowlers are total mugs with bat , you have to resort to bits and pieces players for balance.Kulcha was broken up for same reason.

 

 

Okay so you say frontline bowlers cant have an off day

Would you care to answer this,How many off days has Shardul been through till now?

Shardul went for 80 runs (thats his normal service)

Kuldeep too went for 84 runs (surely he's down but has won us matches so many times)

Shardul has always been crap so what if he could bat,does he bring insurance of scoring that many runs as a supposed allrounder?

 

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Okay so you say frontline bowlers cant have an off day

Would you care to answer this,How many off days has Shardul been through till now?

Shardul went for 80 runs (thats his normal service)

Kuldeep too went for 84 runs (surely he's down but has won us matches so many times)

Shardul has always been crap so what if he could bat,does he bring insurance of scoring that many runs as a supposed allrounder?

 

Shardul played 9 matches in three years, you are sounding as if he is playing every match of every series. Do we have any allrounder in this squad?

 

He might be sitting on the bench next match.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...