Jump to content

Natarajan for Umesh in test matches??


gakgupta

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I know....lots of ICFers will be cursing me for saying this....

Some might even say that there is difference between test matches and T20's

I know all that....but he might not do worse that Umesh...

This guy has brains....and he is left hand bowler....

If Sam curran can do it....why not Natarajan??

Edited by gakgupta
Posted
8 minutes ago, gakgupta said:

I know....lots of ICFers will be cursing me for saying this....

Some might even say that there is difference between test matches and T20's

I know all that....but he might not do worse that Umesh...

This guy has brains....and he is left hand bowler....

If Sam curran can do it....why not Natarajan??

A huge Noooooo.

Posted
9 minutes ago, gakgupta said:

I know....lots of ICFers will be cursing me for saying this....

Some might even say that there is difference between test matches and T20's

I know all that....but he might not do worse that Umesh...

This guy has brains....and he is left hand bowler....

If Sam curran can do it....why not Natarajan??

No man..  It would be straight up defensive.  Trundlers get thrashed in Australia.  You need extra pace over there.  Siraj Saini are better picks as 3rd pacer. 

Posted

I can play him in England may be, not in Australia. Ball  won’t move and Aussies won’t be in a hurry to attack him like how batsmen do in t20s where they fall prey to varitions while attacking.

 

Also let him play for Indian A sides or warm ups.  

Posted

ABSOLUTELY NO.

Don't even think about it.

You dont realise how daunting test cricket can be for a debutant who hasn’t played a significant amount of first class cricket.

Posted (edited)

Does he have the stamina to bowl 20-25 overs/day and field the rest of the time? Not an option unless he has sufficient FC experience, even a sprint GOAT like Usain Bolt can't immediately transfer his skills to marathon racing.....this guy hasn't even cemented his place in shortest format!!!! Nattu adds nothing with bat or on field. I like him and really want him to succeed but he adds max value in T20 cricket, not even ODIs, let us stick to that for the time being. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

No please no, he is just for t20s thats it 

Some bowlers like Varun.C , Natrajan are best only when opp is looking to score quick 

Yup. Even Rashid Khan was very ordinary in the test match against us. 

Edited by nevada
Posted
12 minutes ago, nevada said:

Yup. Even Rashid Khan was very ordinary in the test match against us. 

 

rashid has skills, his problem was bowling with SG all of sudden and he also mentioned in an interview that intially he found it very tough. But i think he has won a test for them with ball 

Posted
6 hours ago, Gollum said:

Does he have the stamina to bowl 20-25 overs/day and field the rest of the time? Not an option unless he has sufficient FC experience, even a sprint GOAT like Usain Bolt can't immediately transfer his skills to marathon racing.....this guy hasn't even cemented his place in shortest format!!!! Nattu adds nothing with bat or on field. I like him and really want him to succeed but he adds max value in T20 cricket, not even ODIs, let us stick to that for the time being. 

He played 20 first class games for tamilnadu

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/player/802575.html

 

Avg 25 on flat Chennai wickets....

 

image.png.f88da7e9852630958a96d075fc947e6f.png

 

Posted

Natarajan won't perform in tests unless he bowls much quicker. Slow balls and yorkers in LOIs are useful not so much in tests. You need someone with pace, swing/seam and bounce to survive in Australia as the kookaburra stops swinging after 20 overs. Im saying bounce because many Indians dont generate enough bounce off of a good length compared to Aussies who are a bit taller. Our bowlers need to have a swing component to match up with them.

Posted
7 hours ago, Adamant said:

ABSOLUTELY NO.

Don't even think about it.

You dont realise how daunting test cricket can be for a debutant who hasn’t played a significant amount of first class cricket.

He cannot sustain,  He & Varun gives us a bit of hope in 21 & 22  T20 WC of a good show.

Posted

Does Saini have tools to do well in this test cricket. He has very little movement, Siraj even though is lot slower has some movement. Both are going to massive drop off in class from Ishant Sharma.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

. Im saying bounce because many Indians dont generate enough bounce off of a good length compared to Aussies who are a bit taller. Our bowlers need to have a swing component to match up with them.

 

 

A very important point.

 

And one of the reasons why Bumrah and Shami have done better than many other Indian pacers.

 

Because Shami and especially Bumrah, get bounce off length balls from time to time ... and surprise batsmen with awkward bounce often enough.  (  Bumrah because of his unusually long arms, hyperextension of arms and high arm action ... Shami because of his seam position, wrist whip and high arm action )

 

Among new pacers ... Prasidh, Tyagi and Mavi have this quality too. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Does Saini have tools to do well in this test cricket. He has very little movement, Siraj even though is lot slower has some movement. Both are going to massive drop off in class from Ishant Sharma.

 

Saini seams the ball both ways with the red ball.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...