Jump to content

151 was not a bad score


sage

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

it wasnt a great score considering

 

  • dew
  • no 6th bowling option
  • shami not a t20 bowler
  • jadeja avg t20 bowler who with dew becomes worse
  • bhuvi struggling

Not to mentio Varun who is inexperienced and not international quality. Bumrah also regressing these days, and chokes in big matches. So basically an innocuous and toothless bowling attack. When did our bowling become so incompetent? Considering our bowling was our strong suit, the last 5 years or so. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

it wasnt a great score considering

 

  • dew
  • no 6th bowling option
  • shami not a t20 bowler
  • jadeja avg t20 bowler who with dew becomes worse
  • bhuvi struggling

So the fault is the bowlers are not up to the mark

Posted
Just now, sage said:

So the fault is the bowlers are not up to the mark

nothing was upto mark that bowling, batting, fielding . Bowling had problems even before stepping in the game as their was selection error 

Posted

Dew and captaincy makes a lot of difference but pacers were definitely subpar. Spinners were expected to struggled but outbowled pacers and did okay given the odds

Posted

Right on..  Dew was a factor but no being able to pick even 1 wicket shows bowling was toothless...  Leg side rubbish from pacers...  No channel bowling.  Nothing but either back off length rubbish. 

 

Our bowling in limited overs has been trash for a while now.  Shardul saves us these days with his lucky breaks...  Otherwise it is as toothless as they come. 

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, sage said:

 What is the point of hosting a premier domestic T20 league just a week before the world cup in the same location and then ignore the bowlers that actually performed.

 

 

Bumrah 3rd

Shami 5th

Varun 6th

 

highest wicket takers in IPL 2021 were in the playing 11.

 

Jadeja was playing as an allrounder.

 

 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
10 minutes ago, Lord said:

Dew and captaincy makes a lot of difference but pacers were definitely subpar. Spinners were expected to struggled but outbowled pacers and did okay given the odds

selection before them

Posted
25 minutes ago, speedheat said:

For some strange reason all three seamers were bowling negative leg side line, that day.

The person who came up with this ridiculous plan should be fired.

 

 

I think we had discussed this exact issue earlier too.

 

The same pacers who bowl attacking lines and lengths for their IPL teams start bowling defensive lines and lengths under Kohli.

 

Kohli is a very very defensive person despite his false bravado and it keeps biting us on the back as he is the captain.

Posted
6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

I think we had discussed this exact issue earlier too.

 

The same pacers who bowl attacking lines and lengths for their IPL teams start bowling defensive lines and lengths under Kohli.

 

Kohli is a very very defensive person despite his false bravado and it keeps biting us on the back as he is the captain.

 

So attacking Tests,but defensive in LOIs

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

shami was never a good choice in main squad 

his issue is death but we never got to that. Did well in IPL and one of few who took early wickets in IPL and even warmup game,so why not go with that

Posted

My hope was India knocking off 2 out of first 3 batsmen and open up the middle order.  Unfortunately they couldn't even beat the batsmen.  Hasad Rauf also maintained a leg stump line.But he was genuinely quick.  Our bowlers barely touched 140k.  They gave us any chance. No zip from our bowlers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...