Vickydev Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 So help them to add a few more sixes to their innings? Even 200 wouldn't have been enough with that bowling. express bowling, AKane and nitinbwj 1 2
Popular Post sage Posted November 10, 2022 Author Popular Post Posted November 10, 2022 Eng 170-0 in 16 overs Dravid: "We should have got 180" nitinbwj, Sgattick10, AKane and 8 others 1 1 8 1
zubinpepsi Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 This fker needs to go first Nash, nitinbwj and express bowling 1 2
nitinbwj Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 Abe Lodu. 200 was bare minimum. You are saying this because Ind effectively scored 168 in the end. Had Hardik failed, we would have scored 145. Then, you would have said 170 was required. STFU and quit nevada, Frustrated and Nash 3
rkt.india Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 15 me 100, 5 me 68. 15 me 150 hone chahiye they. English bowling is nothing great.
rollingstoned Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 So that we would have lost after 1 overs compared to when we did lose? Also he did not say Indian players should play in foreign leagues, he said it will affect test cricket and that Indian cricket will go the West Indian way if we allow that which the bcci never will. Not sure why he thinks that when bcci has plenty of money anyway unlike wicb. express bowling 1
The Realist Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 Just go. You are not cut out to be an international level coach. nitinbwj, express bowling, nevada and 2 others 1 4
Vijy Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: We think we are very smart but Indian coaches are not sought after in international cricket,tell you something doesn't it. Maybe we can send some Indian coaches to these teams and bring down their standard. we can pay other teams a lot of money to take them, so that they don't stay in india? express bowling 1
kubrickian Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 I think 168 was a fighting total on that pitch but even if India had scored 200, Eng would have chased it down. Simply because the bowling was poor. The bowling attack was mediocre to begin with but under pressure, they completely bottled it. They just couldnt handle the KO match pressure and gave away way too many easy runs under the onslaught of Buttler and Hales. Hopefully, this is the last game for Bhuvneswar, Ashwin and Axar in Indian jersey. Need lot better bowlers who can handle pressure to win KO games in ICC tournaments.
Frustrated Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 His brain has gone rotten. What he is suggesting is : Its ok to lose but the loss should be a tad delayed. LOL. Is he not aware that Eng got 170/0 in 16 overs? Which game was he watching today? Or was he busy watching some of his test knocks from archives? nitinbwj and express bowling 1 1
figo6762 Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 Coaches cannot win matches .. I am glad he is not backing Rohit Sharma in saying batting was good
Vijy Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 Just now, figo6762 said: Coaches cannot win matches .. I am glad he is not backing Rohit Sharma in saying batting was good dravid will probably claim that our bowling was good instead. the capn and coach may have decided to split the delusions and lies AKane and anish2tweet 2
R!TTER Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 40 minutes ago, nitinbwj said: Abe Lodu. 200 was bare minimum. You are saying this because Ind effectively scored 168 in the end. Had Hardik failed, we would have scored 145. Then, you would have said 170 was required. STFU and quit We needed much better bowling, yes 200 should've been the aim but wanna bet Pak would defend something similar here? Frustrated and Vijy 2
Vijy Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 1 minute ago, R!TTER said: We needed much better bowling, yes 200 should've been the aim but wanna bet Pak would defend something similar here? likely that they would have steamrolled eng if they had 170-180 to defend. we will see, however, what happens in the final... I am expecting pak victory
R!TTER Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, Vijy said: likely that they would have steamrolled eng if they had 170-180 to defend. we will see, however, what happens in the final... I am expecting pak victory Actually at MCG I'm betting on Eng because that's a wicked wicket especially under the lights! The ball will fly there & it has much more pace than Adelaide right now, not much spin though. Edited November 10, 2022 by R!TTER Vijy 1
Sgattick10 Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 What is Paddy Upton doing? Esp with KL Rahul nitinbwj 1
Clarke Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 (edited) Some minds are just not cut for T20. Rahane was one, this guy another. They're ok with a bit here & there oblivious to external realities like Eng's (or WI in case of Rahane & 2016) batting. No fearless mind, no fearsome intent, no major objectives. KL & Shubman have made similar comments on SR being overrated. Edited November 10, 2022 by Clarke
Ajju Posted November 10, 2022 Posted November 10, 2022 1 hour ago, sage said: To get Hales 100 express bowling and nevada 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now