BacktoCricaddict Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 Just now, Lord said: Glad you included Arshdeep :D I'd have following pace attack Arshdeep Prasidh Mohsin (if fit) Harshit (as bowling AR) What about Kaverappa? Link to comment
Number Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 8 minutes ago, Lord said: This is just his PR at work. Will believe it once its announced Yes. These kind of things are done to get attention of the selectors. Lord 1 Link to comment
IndiaWC8311 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 This guy is a loser no winning mentality If you want a fast spinner take Deepak Chahar, who can bat and has winning mentality Frustrated, Laaloo, putrevus and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment
putrevus Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 This guy needs to take that Arshdeep with him, he is another useless guy who will not do anything. Frustrated and raki05 2 Link to comment
raki05 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 (edited) I know few icfers who will be jerking off after hearing this subh samachaar!! Edited November 9, 2023 by raki05 IndiaWC8311, Frustrated, singhvivek141 and 3 others 6 Link to comment
NameGoesHere Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 (edited) I wanted to write a lot of smack on this but thought why bother, why not just repost what I wrote a few months ago? Here goes: My theory of bowler selection for the Indian team is simple. First, avoid whenever possible, selecting a bowler by the surname Kumar. It’s an ordinary name, without the weft and weight an accomplished bowler should possess. Kumar? Kumar? If his parents put such little thought in choosing their surname, how much of an effort is the lad himself making in his bowling, you wonder. Remember Praveen Kumar? The more complicated or multisyllabic the name, the better that bowler is going to be. Hence Bhuvneshwar Kumar was a better choice (if such a choice were to be made) than the syllable - deprived, and pace deprived, Mukesh Kumar. As per my theory, had his parents named him Mukararaladbadavhalchittlralal Kumaramangalam, he probably would have had fifty Test wickets by now. Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, Erapalli Prasanna, Venkataraghavan. Such magnificent, syllable rich worthies who set a glorious tradition followed by Ravichander Ashwin. With a name like that you knew he had to succeed. Anil was saved by his unusual surname, Kumble. And the ostensibly simply named Kapil was actually Nikhanj, hence clearly destined for greatness. And if you’re named Javagal or Zaheer or Venkatesh, these somewhat more unusual names predict you’re going to do well. Look at the magnificently named Jasprit Bumrah, or Mohammed Siraj. They may lack a few syllables compared to others, but their names stand out. I mean to have Bumrah or Siraj or Shami as a surname requires incredible foresight, you know these boys were born to bowl for India. Basis that, I now have high hopes for Prasidh. Of course based on my theory Jaydev Unadkat should have had 500 wickets by now, but I feel that it’s the fault of the selectors, who should have paid more attention to the name. And given him at least 200 games. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. Do not bother to reply if your name doesn’t have at least three syllables. Edited November 9, 2023 by NameGoesHere IndiaWC8311, Mosher, Lord and 6 others 9 Link to comment
Laaloo Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 IndiaWC8311 and raki05 1 1 Link to comment
singhvivek141 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 25 minutes ago, NameGoesHere said: I wanted to write a lot of smack on this but thought why bother, why not just repost what I wrote a few months ago? Here goes: My theory of bowler selection for the Indian team is simple. First, avoid whenever possible, selecting a bowler by the surname Kumar. It’s an ordinary name, without the weft and weight an accomplished bowler should possess. Kumar? Kumar? If his parents put such little thought in choosing their surname, how much of an effort is the lad himself making in his bowling, you wonder. Remember Praveen Kumar? The more complicated or multisyllabic the name, the better that bowler is going to be. Hence Bhuvneshwar Kumar was a better choice (if such a choice were to be made) than the syllable - deprived, and pace deprived, Mukesh Kumar. As per my theory, had his parents named him Mukararaladbadavhalchittlralal Kumaramangalam, he probably would have had fifty Test wickets by now. Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, Erapalli Prasanna, Venkataraghavan. Such magnificent, syllable rich worthies who set a glorious tradition followed by Ravichander Ashwin. With a name like that you knew he had to succeed. Anil was saved by his unusual surname, Kumble. And the ostensibly simply named Kapil was actually Nikhanj, hence clearly destined for greatness. And if you’re named Javagal or Zaheer or Venkatesh, these somewhat more unusual names predict you’re going to do well. Look at the magnificently named Jasprit Bumrah, or Mohammed Siraj. They may lack a few syllables compared to others, but their names stand out. I mean to have Bumrah or Siraj or Shami as a surname requires incredible foresight, you know these boys were born to bowl for India. Basis that, I now have high hopes for Prasidh. Of course based on my theory Jaydev Unadkat should have had 500 wickets by now, but I feel that it’s the fault of the selectors, who should have paid more attention to the name. And given him at least 200 games. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. Do not bother to reply if your name doesn’t have at least three syllables. Now I understood why Thirunavukarasu Kumaran failed as a bowler. I am now worried about future of Mayank Yadav as well. We should ask him to change his name to Mayankeshwarnath Yadavendra, Harshit Rana should change his name to Harshiteshwar Ranavaidyanathan. Kartik Tyagi to Kartikswamy Tyagisekhara. Rajvardhan Hangargekar is safe on that front. raki05 and NameGoesHere 2 Link to comment
Need4Speed Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 44 minutes ago, NameGoesHere said: I wanted to write a lot of smack on this but thought why bother, why not just repost what I wrote a few months ago? Here goes: My theory of bowler selection for the Indian team is simple. First, avoid whenever possible, selecting a bowler by the surname Kumar. It’s an ordinary name, without the weft and weight an accomplished bowler should possess. Kumar? Kumar? If his parents put such little thought in choosing their surname, how much of an effort is the lad himself making in his bowling, you wonder. Remember Praveen Kumar? The more complicated or multisyllabic the name, the better that bowler is going to be. Hence Bhuvneshwar Kumar was a better choice (if such a choice were to be made) than the syllable - deprived, and pace deprived, Mukesh Kumar. As per my theory, had his parents named him Mukararaladbadavhalchittlralal Kumaramangalam, he probably would have had fifty Test wickets by now. Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, Erapalli Prasanna, Venkataraghavan. Such magnificent, syllable rich worthies who set a glorious tradition followed by Ravichander Ashwin. With a name like that you knew he had to succeed. Anil was saved by his unusual surname, Kumble. And the ostensibly simply named Kapil was actually Nikhanj, hence clearly destined for greatness. And if you’re named Javagal or Zaheer or Venkatesh, these somewhat more unusual names predict you’re going to do well. Look at the magnificently named Jasprit Bumrah, or Mohammed Siraj. They may lack a few syllables compared to others, but their names stand out. I mean to have Bumrah or Siraj or Shami as a surname requires incredible foresight, you know these boys were born to bowl for India. Basis that, I now have high hopes for Prasidh. Of course based on my theory Jaydev Unadkat should have had 500 wickets by now, but I feel that it’s the fault of the selectors, who should have paid more attention to the name. And given him at least 200 games. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. Do not bother to reply if your name doesn’t have at least three syllables. whats your name btw :D express bowling 1 Link to comment
Need4Speed Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 kya bc hai..if Bhuvi Kumar is back..they are willing to take him for next T20 wcup..all the T20 matches going fwd shud be for T20 wcup prep..PERIOD.. Role of Bhuvi nd other Kumars should be to test the new generation of Indian domestic batters..how they smack their line and length bowling..thats how they can still contribute to Indian cricket.. I feel this is Bhuvi's PR putting pressure on selectors.. express bowling 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 2 hours ago, Lord said: Glad you included Arshdeep :D I'd have following pace attack Arshdeep Prasidh Mohsin (if fit) Harshit (as bowling AR) I want Harshit to debut in ODIs. 5 day and 50 over cricket are his forte till now. Mayank Y is bowling so well in 50 over and 20 over cricket that he has to be tried now. Mohsin is looking so unfit and obese. We should not promote unfit cricketers, especially pacers. Mosher and raki05 2 Link to comment
The Realist Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 Bhuvi Kumar Mohit Sharma Deepak Chahar Harshal Patel Avesh Khan Dravid licking his lips raki05 1 Link to comment
maniac Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 Just when Indian cricket was becoming exciting. Thank you BCCI Mosher, express bowling, raki05 and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment
maniac Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 13 minutes ago, The Realist said: Bhuvi Kumar Mohit Sharma Deepak Chahar Harshal Patel Avesh Khan Dravid licking his lips i beleive the conspiracy that Modiji and Jay Shah have locked up Dravid to ensure we win this. Our bowling is looking too good. raki05 1 Link to comment
Lord Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 24 minutes ago, express bowling said: I want Harshit to debut in ODIs. 5 day and 50 over cricket are his forte till now. Mayank Y is bowling so well in 50 over and 20 over cricket that he has to be tried now. Mohsin is looking so unfit and obese. We should not promote unfit cricketers, especially pacers. Didn't know about Mohsin. Looked good in IPL. Its sad if he has become obese :((. Mayank is good but its certain that they won't select anyone in T20 without IPL exposure. Sad but its true. Other than these, Hangargekar,Kuldeep Sen,Yudhvir Singh etc should be tried. Its also very important to groom a genuine pacer who can bat at 8. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 This world cup was such a wonderful kumarless Tournament. Now we are going to invite them back again? Need4Speed, Mosher, Lone Wolf and 5 others 8 Link to comment
NameGoesHere Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said: Now I understood why Thirunavukarasu Kumaran failed as a bowler. I am now worried about future of Mayank Yadav as well. We should ask him to change his name to Mayankeshwarnath Yadavendra, Harshit Rana should change his name to Harshiteshwar Ranavaidyanathan. Kartik Tyagi to Kartikswamy Tyagisekhara. Rajvardhan Hangargekar is safe on that front. Yes! Otherwise we are doomed to failure!’ Doomed I tell you! Edited November 9, 2023 by NameGoesHere Link to comment
NameGoesHere Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 2 hours ago, Need4Speed said: whats your name btw :D Shaymakrishnagopala L*nNaresh Coomar. Need4Speed and raki05 2 Link to comment
AuxiliA Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 When I was a little kid I used to think that atleast half of the Indians were named Kumar. express bowling and raki05 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now