Jump to content

47,000 years ago, for 7000 years, humans were having sex with neandarthals

BacktoCricaddict

By BacktoCricaddict
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Real McCoy said:

 

dei nee enna thaan meme pottalum, appadi thaan pannuven. oora kooti oppari vei :lol:

So juve, responding with some inane gifs and thinking kya gajab ki ki responses diya. Wah! He might be taking selfies and praising himself appluading his response 

Lone Wolf Grand Master

Lone Wolf

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Vicks57 said:

 

 

Yeah Already know about this.

 

Most paternal genes from western Europe come from yamnaya.

 

Already existing paternal dna pool was wiped out.

 

When you look at the language, all European languages are indo-european which adds to the finding in the study. Only language that is not Indo-European is Basque. Kudos to Basque people for retaining their culture.

 

But the crazy thing is when Yamnaya people reached India or South Asia, they did not wipe out the males. Atleast there is no evidence of it. They interbred with already existing people in South Asia and created modern day Indians.

We don't know for sure... Science suggests inavsive species tend to be aggressive towards natives.. either they lost to natives and were pushed towards North West or Iran.. or they claimed decisive victory.

 

Earliest battle in Hindi text Rigveda ... The battle of the ten Kings which suggests that losers were driven out to Iran or Persia too.

coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted

@BacktoCricaddict When does science consider something as genetics or geneology perfect science like the Newton’s laws? There are millions of theories put forth in various journals and argued here as though it is cast in stone! Peer-reviewed science in archeo-genetics  is as good as the people discussing it here. One guy puts forth a theory and proves it with limited sample size and we all agree it is true until the next guy proves it differently with different sample .

Real McCoy Veteran

Real McCoy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

@BacktoCricaddict When does science consider something as genetics or geneology perfect science like the Newton’s laws? There are millions of theories put forth in various journals and argued here as though it is cast in stone! Peer-reviewed science in archeo-genetics  is as good as the people discussing it here. One guy puts forth a theory and proves it with limited sample size and we all agree it is true until the next guy proves it differently with different sample .

 

They could even go to the grave of a deformed man and call his skull a neanderthal one. #toomuchconspiracy

coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

Disagree with your opinion.

 

If someone says I am having sex with Neanderthal (different species), I am going to give it back.

You keep giving casteist slurs (sanghi Brahmin mofos of this forum)   ,  people will mock you anyway they please. If you dish out, you can’t take it on the chin)

Edited by coffee_rules
coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

I am not the one who ran back crying to the mods.:hatsoff:

 

We can discuss about casteism in politics where it belongs and not in science thread :phehe:

 

When you break all rules, you don’t get to make rules. Sorry to OP for hijacking this thread. 

BacktoCricaddict Grand Master

BacktoCricaddict

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

@BacktoCricaddict When does science consider something as genetics or geneology perfect science like the Newton’s laws? There are millions of theories put forth in various journals and argued here as though it is cast in stone! Peer-reviewed science in archeo-genetics  is as good as the people discussing it here. One guy puts forth a theory and proves it with limited sample size and we all agree it is true until the next guy proves it differently with different sample .

There is no such thing as perfect science. There are no dogmas or absolutes. I would even go so far as to say that even Newton's "laws" are not infallible. After all, quantum physics was developed to explain phenomena at the subatomic level that don't "obey" Newton's principles.

 

But, it cannot be a bunch of internet warriors who would bring it down. After years or decades of observations, hypotheses, painstaking and rigorous experiments using well-controlled methods, analysis of falfsifiable data, and conclusions that are consistent with a new paradigm, new laws could be proposed.

 

Gene-data and genealogy are even more dynamic, and no one claims them to be as tight as gravity or thermodynamics. The reason, of course is that (a) the fossil record is being continuously updated by new excavations, (b) fossil dating methods are being upgraded. and (c) gene-analysis data are being upgraded. Knowledge is continuously being built, challenged and upgraded continuously.

 

The scientists simply report their findings in scientific journals. If you read the original research articles, you will see a discussion of the most likely interpretation of their findings and also alternative explanations. There will also be a section describing limitations of their work. Peer-review by experts would mainly be to ensure that appropriate experimental methods were used and a comprehensive analysis was done in the context of current literature.

 

Of course, things get twisted when these scientific findings are then distilled down and over-simplified by university marketing staff, journalists and internet warriors. So, while the science can stand on its own, the narratives are set outside the lab by non-scientists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by BacktoCricaddict
bharathh Grand Master

bharathh

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Vicks57 said:

 

 

Dai thaiyoli you are a tamil living in Bangalore. You speak a Dravidian language whether you like it or not. 

 

If you have that much hatred towards South Indians, I suggest you cut your tongue out.

 

Don't you know 'Dravida' in Sanskrit means land surrounded by water on three sides?

 

 

My language and ancestry far predates some Brahmin and Hindu hating idealogy spouted by an insane man and carried forward by a drugs mafia who cloak their nefarious activities with political power. 

ravishingravi Grand Master

ravishingravi

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, MechEng said:

47000 years was Dwapara Yug, people were 15 feet tall on average.

 

@coffee_rules @Norman @Laaloo @Austin 3:!6 @LordPrabhzy @ravishingravi @real fan @Gollum hinduon, tum sab sharam karo. Itna bhi nahin pata tum logon ko?

 

Tumhari Hinduiyat sirf Modi aur BJP tak seemit hain kya?

 

Arrey this guy is still stuck in Mumbai traffic. Don't blame him if he has lost his balance. Mumbai traffic can do this to the best. 

coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, MechEng said:

47000 years was Dwapara Yug, people were 15 feet tall on average.

 

@coffee_rules @Norman @Laaloo @Austin 3:!6 @LordPrabhzy @ravishingravi @real fan @Gollum hinduon, tum sab sharam karo. Itna bhi nahin pata tum logon ko?

 

Tumhari Hinduiyat sirf Modi aur BJP tak seemit hain kya?

 

Get the Yugas right, at least. Rama lived in Treta Yuga , was Ajaanubahu (15 feet tall). 47,000 years ago is alrady Kali Yuga where people are about the same height as you and me. Hinduiyat nahi hota hain, Hindutva hota hain. 

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...