Jump to content

NZ tour of England | 3 tests | Lord's , Oval, Trent Bridge | June 04 - June 29


Poll  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Predict series result

  2. 2. How many 100s for Joe Root

  3. 3. Which of these rising stars will have a better series?



Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

Our 4th innings is Pant or nothing. If Pant scores we get close else we're done.

Under Gambhir, they muddle up his game as well by slotting a keeper into a top order batting slot where he is singled out as "match ka mujrim" if his approach costs a wicket even while all the "proper" batsmen slink away

Edited by lemsip
Posted

Wish we had a wicket taker in Henry and extremely annoying and difficult bowler to get away in Jamieson.Henry has blown away Eng. On Good pitches ,NZ has the batting and the bowling to defeat Eng all the time. Eng are struggling with newcomers 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

Root took 3 Drs reviews in this innings. What a **** show. Lucky *er 

Kiwis ko sorry bol, prevented his 100.

 

Root has plundered India the most, distant second will be Pakistan. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Crushing win, well done Kiwis. Series beautifully poised. Best thing is most Indian fans will enjoy no matter who loses. 

Bhai cannot support Kiwis.. Hopefully England wins and their big guns return.  Stokes Smith Atkinson Robinson 

 

This a smug bunch of Kiwi players as well.

Posted (edited)

The bowlers who have really punished NZ in the last 4 years have been Robinson, Carse and Atkinson.

 

They were all out of this Test match. 

 

Atkinson and Robinson are likely to come back next match .

 

If England can play Archer, Atkinson, Robinson and Tongue/Fisher, that will really test the Kiwis once more

 

Edited by Nikhil_cric
Posted

What exactly banning Stokes for one test achieve.It was just done to appease public.They were out after winning the test, why was there any need to have curfew in first place.

 

They lost Ashes as they were not good enough not because they went to Noosa  after losing first two tests as moronic Botham put it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, putrevus said:

What exactly banning Stokes for one test achieve.It was just done to appease public.They were out after winning the test, why was there any need to have curfew in first place.

 

They lost Ashes as they were not good enough not because they went to Noosa  after losing first two tests as moronic Botham put it.

Team curfew makes sense on game days but Stokes went when there was no game right? What's point of curfew on such days? 

Posted
35 minutes ago, nevada said:

Team curfew makes sense on game days but Stokes went when there was no game right? What's point of curfew on such days? 

Whatever information I got was they went out after they had won the test.

Posted
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

What exactly banning Stokes for one test achieve.It was just done to appease public.They were out after winning the test, why was there any need to have curfew in first place.

 

They lost Ashes as they were not good enough not because they went to Noosa  after losing first two tests as moronic Botham put it.

Stokes doesn't deserve a place in their first XI. Specialist captains make no sense unless you are a minnow. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nikhil_cric said:

The bowlers who have really punished NZ in the last 4 years have been Robinson, Carse and Atkinson.

 

They were all out of this Test match. 

 

Atkinson and Robinson are likely to come back next match .

 

If England can play Archer, Atkinson, Robinson and Tongue/Fisher, that will really test the Kiwis once more

 

Atkinson and Stokes are back as BaZ said.

Robinson is unclear probably won't make it.

What happened to Carse??

Posted
1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said:

Atkinson and Stokes are back as BaZ said.

Robinson is unclear probably won't make it.

What happened to Carse??

No idea.  Think he was carrying a couple of niggles during the Ashes

Posted
2 hours ago, Gollum said:

Stokes doesn't deserve a place in their first XI. Specialist captains make no sense unless you are a minnow. 

If he bowls I don’t think he is bad, he was the best bowler who kept leash on run rate last year against India.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...