DRS for England series is a good start. Continue DRS? (Poll)

[fineleg]

BCCI used DRS as a "lets try it out" for England series.

We should continue this? Poll added. Vote..

Edited December 21, 2016 by fineleg

[G_B_]

I still have doubts on its tracking ability when it comes to big turn....

 

but yes for now i would continue it.

[Unleashed]

100% yes. Without DRS we would've got Root out in both of the innings.

[WC2011INDIA]

Not sure. Australia is much better at using DRS/hotspot technology than most other teams, so don't know if we should have this for Australia series. 

[MCcricket]

Drs is generally good but why limit reviews to 2 n make the decision making process a tactical one then making right decisions all the time, why did umpire use referral twice on England's behalf n insistence n went out of the abiding laws n they had saved one review n other time did not have any?

What if the decision coming down to umpires call, then why should those decisions also use up your review also what if umpiring is very bad and team has used their two reviews on umpires call judgement and then on field umpire makes serious bounders?

[BeautifulGame]

Absolutely yes.

It shouldn't even be a question

[coffee_rules]

34 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

Absolutely yes.

It shouldn't even be a question

Yes, is it even a doubt now? Kumble should only convince the ODI/T20 kaptaan to embrace technology. 

[fineleg]

6 hours ago, WC2011INDIA said:

Not sure. Australia is much better at using DRS/hotspot technology than most other teams, so don't know if we should have this for Australia series. 

Yes Aussies good , but we need to improve. The only way Kohli and co. will improve is to use it, make mistakes and learn from it. Avoiding it will be no learning.

[beetle]

yes

[cowboysfan]

absolutely,aussies will think twice about sweeping especially against Jaddu. 

[mancalledsting]

Will help us big time in overseas tours where we have been known to get some stinkers in the past....imagine Buckner with drs 

[Sachinism]

On ‎21‎/‎12‎/‎2016 at 6:42 AM, G_B_ said:

I still have doubts on its tracking ability when it comes to big turn....

 

but yes for now i would continue it.

Agree. Some of the tracking seems kinda questionable. Though overall I feel it provides more correct results. Happy to keep using it going forward

[Soorma_Bhopali]

Definitely , we should continue using it .

 

Minor suggestions - make it atleast 3 reviews per 80 overs of play 

 

Also , fielding team should not lose reviews for umpire's call .

[kosingh]

I don't like deciding to use it based on whether it helps or hurts India.

 

Ultimately I want India to do well, but based on correct umpiring decisions. And although DRS technology itself is not 100% accurate, it certainly is better than what on field umpires give us. 

[Laaloo]

yes its a no brainer but the op was never known for its brains.

Edited December 22, 2016 by laaloo

[Cricketics]

I like but it shouldn't be a question any way. We should be doing what rest of the world in cricket is doing and shouldn't look different from others. When the worl is using DRS, we must also, regardless of it not being perfect.

[bowl_out]

Nothing alarming has happened for BCCI to reject DRS outright. 

 

Plus we won the series 4-0.. So, wouldn't expect BCCI to change anything yet.

[bowl_out]

One small change.. Reset reviews after every 80 overs rather than once at 80 overs