Jump to content

In Stats: How Wriddhiman Saha Emerged Out Of MS Dhoni’s Shadow


CG

Recommended Posts

Posted

Saha's batting gets under-rated because he doesn't bat like the typical Indian batsman.  He is not a guy who's going to boss the bowling and hit good balls for 4 with attractive looking shots.  A typical Saha big innings is one where he gets to bat alongside someone else who is the dominant player in the partnership, while Saha holds his end up and quietly accumulates runs.   He can and does dominate spin bowling, but not the pacers.  But as the article points out - he's ended this season piling up some priceless runs for Team India.    And he is by far, the best gloveman in test cricket - against spin and pace.  

Posted
Saha's batting gets under-rated because he doesn't bat like the typical Indian batsman.  He is not a guy who's going to boss the bowling and hit good balls for 4 with attractive looking shots.  A typical Saha big innings is one where he gets to bat alongside someone else who is the dominant player in the partnership, while Saha holds his end up and quietly accumulates runs.   He can and does dominate spin bowling, but not the pacers.  But as the article points out - he's ended this season piling up some priceless runs for Team India.    And he is by far, the best gloveman in test cricket - against spin and pace.  

He is more of classical test batsman mould who have good judgement outside off stump and try to take runs when they bowl in his area .Actually he has more shots against Pacers rather than spinners whom he mostly sweeps.

Posted

Bats like an absolute tailender for the first 20 balls.

 

Once he passes that period, its like heaven and earth difference.

 

Looks confident, shots come out and can survive in tough conditions too.

 

Should bat at number 6 from now on.

Posted

I always backed Saha, his keeping is more important than his batting but as this thread shows, even his batting is good and an upgrade from the previous Indian keepers:giggle:, some clueless posters wanted saha to be dropped after a couple of bad innings, I wonder where they are now :giggle:

Posted
4 minutes ago, kira said:

I always backed Saha, his keeping is more important than his batting but as this thread shows, even his batting is good and an upgrade from the previous Indian keepers:giggle:, some clueless posters wanted saha to be dropped after a couple of bad innings, I wonder where they are now :giggle:

Some of them are busy worshipping at the altar of Renshaw - A fat white kangaroo version of Akash Chopra.   Barely has any offside game, will get owned by the likes of old man Anderson once he plays on wickets where the ball swings a bit.  

Posted

Saha should have been much earlier into our test team for his superior keeping skills with decent batting.Instead we stood with a decent(or below average impact wise) test batsman with average keeping skills.

Now we can continue with Saha till he loses his batting form.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Pollack said:

Saha should have been much earlier into our test team for his superior keeping skills with decent batting.Instead we stood with a decent(or below average impact wise) test batsman with average keeping skills.

Now we can continue with Saha till he loses his batting form.

Its a mistake many teams make - Aussies dropped Nevill for Wade for "batting".   England play Bairstow ahead of other keepers.  Be grateful that Saha is a capable enough bat that we can have a quality keeper like him backing up our bowlers.  Now for the slip cordon to stop being amateurs and our bowlers will start delivering overseas and the team can start making history.

Posted
36 minutes ago, laaloo said:

I dont know about batting but this guy is a damn good wicketkeeper to both spin and pace. He goes for catches no other wk in Indian cricket history did. He's pulled off some stunners in this series alone.

Not no other wicketkeeper in Indian cricket history did - Kirmani and Mongia used to go for those kind of catches as well. 

he is a better bat than both though.

 

Posted
47 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Its a mistake many teams make - Aussies dropped Nevill for Wade for "batting".   England play Bairstow ahead of other keepers.  Be grateful that Saha is a capable enough bat that we can have a quality keeper like him backing up our bowlers.  Now for the slip cordon to stop being amateurs and our bowlers will start delivering overseas and the team can start making history.

I am not ungrateful. Infact its the opposite.I am saying Saha should have been in place of Dhoni in tests much before.Dhoni delayed a genuine keeper and a genuine test match player.However I stand by my point that if he lose his batting form and becomes a passenger as far as batting is concerned I wouldn't want him in the team for superior keeping skills alone because I want Indian team to groom a new younger keeper amongst Pant or Kishan or both so that if they have some faults in keeping technique they would be given time and space. Saha has only few years left mostly.

Posted
1 hour ago, sandeep said:

Some of them are busy worshipping at the altar of Renshaw - A fat white kangaroo version of Akash Chopra.   Barely has any offside game, will get owned by the likes of old man Anderson once he plays on wickets where the ball swings a bit.  

Lol 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Pollack said:

I am not ungrateful. Infact its the opposite.I am saying Saha should have been in place of Dhoni in tests much before.Dhoni delayed a genuine keeper and a genuine test match player.However I stand by my point that if he lose his batting form and becomes a passenger as far as batting is concerned I wouldn't want him in the team for superior keeping skills alone because I want Indian team to groom a new younger keeper amongst Pant or Kishan or both so that if they have some faults in keeping technique they would be given time and space. Saha has only few years left mostly.

Isn't Saha only 32 ? It means he can have another 5 years- remember, he is a late starter, so his body does not have as much miles on him like someone who is 32 and playing international cricket since they were 21. 

As long as Saha can average around 30 with the bat, he is not a passenger, coz anything above 30 runs average for #7 is a bonus, really.


Pant and Kishan should be groomed, but they need 2-3 years of limited exposure to fully develop their fitness for test cricket. Wicketkeeping is much harder than it looks on the body because its like doing 500 squats a day, holding each squat for 15-20 seconds. Not easy on your back at all and plenty of wicketkeeper's careers are cut short due to back problems. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...