Am I there only to play tabla? Ravi Shastri defends pulling up Rishabh Pant

[Ankit_sharma03]

15 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Who said Dhawan was not deserving in test, He could not be worse than Rahul as an opener.Dhawan would have done very well at home.Dhawan scored 183 on test debut .Dhawan like Sehwag has weakness against moving ball.It is not like we have Sunil Gavaskar waiting in wings.

Rahul had 100 in Eng, Aus, WI and runs in damn difficult pitches at home against Aus

dhawan only NZ, rest didnt do much in tough times 

 

A player performing 4-5 times in diff condition to one performing in 1 huge diff 

 

that shud answer 1st question so rahul was better .

Every batsman has a weakness....sehwag overcame his weakness with his strength to attack. Sehwag in many ways was diff then dhawan n many other batsman 

 

15 minutes ago, putrevus said:

It was Rahul who he replaced , Dhawan never got so many chances as Rahul, I am sure he would have done better, I don't think anyone can do worse.

dhawan played 34 test

KL 36 

So both has played similar amount

 

Dhawan never performed in tough scenarios . Everyone thought same he cant be worse they both played in england

Dhawan cudnt score a 50, 2 tours of england and not one 50

Rahul scored 150 in his worse form on his 1st tour

 

Oh yes my frend a player who cannot score a single 50 on 2 tours of Eng cannot be better then a player who score 150 on his tour 

15 minutes ago, putrevus said:

The moment Pandya stopped being part of Indian test team

, India looked proper team.

The moment pandya wasnt in team india played a lighter team....so comparisons are wrong

Let that 6th batsman perform better then pandya in Eng n Sa against their attack n then say that 

15 minutes ago, putrevus said:

 

Rohit has earned the right due to his performances in other formats.Did anyone stop Rahul or Rahane to score runs like Rohit did  in format they had been chosen and demand a place in the team in other formats.

 

Rahul has a stellar record in t20 so why isnt he playing that format ? 

Roy , finch , bairstrow scored tons of runs in ODi and we all knw what happ in test.....so dont mix format. A player shud play in a format in which he perfoms.....white ball n red ball skills are diff. Dnt talk like Khota ur better 

 

[putrevus]

41 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Rahul had 100 in Eng, Aus, WI and runs in damn difficult pitches at home against Aus

dhawan only NZ, rest didnt do much in tough times 

 

A player performing 4-5 times in diff condition to one performing in 1 huge diff 

 

that shud answer 1st question so rahul was better .

Every batsman has a weakness....sehwag overcame his weakness with his strength to attack. Sehwag in many ways was diff then dhawan n many other batsman 

 

dhawan played 34 test

KL 36 

So both has played similar amount

 

Dhawan never performed in tough scenarios . Everyone thought same he cant be worse they both played in england

Dhawan cudnt score a 50, 2 tours of england and not one 50

Rahul scored 150 in his worse form on his 1st tour

 

Oh yes my frend a player who cannot score a single 50 on 2 tours of Eng cannot be better then a player who score 150 on his tour 

The moment pandya wasnt in team india played a lighter team....so comparisons are wrong

Let that 6th batsman perform better then pandya in Eng n Sa against their attack n then say that 

Rahul has a stellar record in t20 so why isnt he playing that format ? 

Roy , finch , bairstrow scored tons of runs in ODi and we all knw what happ in test.....so dont mix format. A player shud play in a format in which he perfoms.....white ball n red ball skills are diff. Dnt talk like Khota ur better 

 

Dhawan played 34 stop and start matches. Dhawan was MOS in SL and in India his record is very good.Scoring 1 hundred in two years and averaging 22 even after getting chance after chance is not called player with talent.

 

Dhawan was thrown out multiple times in the same series while Rahul kept getting his chances.  India would have both series in England and SA if Pandya had not played and an extra batsman played just like they did in Australia.Indian bowling was good enough to pick 20 wickets in most matches.

 

Why you think Roy got his chances , the same way Rohit is getting his chances after his stellar world cup.Will Rohit do well in tests, I don't think so but it is all upto Rohit he cannot complain about not getting chances.Once he is out of the way other players will get their chance thats how system should work and it is fair too IMO.

 

Bairstow's case is very much like Rahul both of them were strokeless wonders when they made their test debuts and once they started their white ball cricket they lost their basics and became clueless in test cricket and both of them are rightfully kicked out.It is upto them to work hard and make a comeback

[Ankit_sharma03]

5 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Dhawan played 34 stop and start matches. Dhawan was MOS in SL and in India his record is very good.Scoring 1 hundred in two years and averaging 22 even after getting chance after chance is not called player with talent.

Ofcourse not onlt TM doesnt understand format diff they also dont understand u dnt pick players who do well against weak sides after dropping them for their struggle against good sides

 

No thats called bad form.....the gr8 tendulkar once avg 17 in 2003 happens to many . Poor form doesnt reduce ur talent...best of the best have gone through such low phases

 

U hve to do something to earn chances....lanka bashing cant be criteria if so then TM had no right to drop rayudu 

5 minutes ago, putrevus said:

 

Dhawan was thrown out multiple times in the same series while Rahul kept getting his chances.  India would have both series in England and SA if Pandya had not played and an extra batsman played just like they did in Australia.Indian bowling was good enough to pick 20 wickets in most matches.

Coz rahul has done something over dhawan which i told u before

 

Fact check on pandya

N how much did the 6th batsman perform in Aus- only one half century.....so 6th batsman made no impact in Aus. Pandya also scored 1 50s in Sa n ENg so no diff. Aus bowling has been struggling(which i made a post on starc n hazelwood number post sandpaper gate) in their condition as compare to Sa or england. 

 

So comparisons are bizzare.....coz 6th batsman did nothing

IF not for pandya we wud not even have won one game 

 

yes our bowling was bloody good yet pandya won us one game by bowling n if batting was weak yet pandya saved our arse in SA 1st test

 

Diff between Sa , ENg n Aus was- pujara form n runs from openers in last 2 test ...and aus was very weak 

 

5 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Why you think Roy got his chances , the same way Rohit is getting his chances after his stellar world cup.Will Rohit do well in tests, I don't think so but it is all upto Rohit he cannot complain about not getting chances.Once he is out of the way other players will get their chance thats how system should work and it is fair too IMO.

Its not bad to give chances but repeated chance is foolish when guys like dhawan n rohit have failed consistently....roy got his 1st chances

 

 

[Vilander]

9 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

"Don't say team management, I spoke about 'the rap on the knuckles'. If someone goofs up, I have to pull them up. Am I there only to play tabla? But this guy is world class, this guy can be destructive, can be a destroyer. And we will give him all the support that he needs to prosper in international cricket," Ravi Shastri told Hindustan Times.

"Pant is different, he is world class and is a brutal match-winner. Very few around in the world game; I can't pick five on my hands when it comes to white-ball cricket, T20 cricket. So the patience we will have with him is a lot.

"All your media reports and all the experts writing (but) Pant is in great space with this Indian team. Experts, they have a job, they can speak. Pant is a special kid and he has already done enough. And he is only going to learn. This team management will back him to the hilt."

you can not find anything wrong in what he said there.

[rtmohanlal]

there is one film in my local language where a man is 'getting started to be  doubted' as having  'psychic disorder' because of hereditary reasons by his own close relatives. They starts to  act with him in such manner.  Soon others in the neighbourhood  take  over. Finally they all make him really mad.

Hope Pant does not gets such fate.

Why can't this pathetic moron coach keep  his opinions about Pant to himself ?? Why making such statements in the public?? Seems even his minimum senses are lost due to bottle consumption. 

[jf1gp_1]

8 hours ago, putrevus said:

Rahul got chances in the most important format.He flopped miserably.

I am no Rahul fan but you are being unfair. He did well in World Cup. Everyone except jaddu was miserable in semis.

[Khota]

I have no clue what he is there for but it i definitely not coaching.

[bahubali]

15 hours ago, TheWall said:

bewda had put the ICFers in a state of confusion now....

The slap he got on his ass made him change his remarks.

[bahubali]

10 hours ago, putrevus said:

Rohit is the only guy who got backing even though but he stepped and chose to become an opener when there was nobody there and he succeeded there or he would have been history by now. Yuvi was backed becuause there was no other player who could tonk the ball like him.Just like Pandya is being backed now even though he flopped for most tests.You cannot expect every played to be backed and given same chances.

 

Rahul will be in the squad and Dhawan will be out soon,Stop making a fuss over some crappy t20s which nobody cares.Rahul got chances in the most important format.He flopped miserably.

Tell this to your God kohli....

[bahubali]

8 hours ago, putrevus said:

Who said Dhawan was not deserving in test, He could not be worse than Rahul as an opener.Dhawan would have done very well at home.Dhawan scored 183 on test debut .Dhawan like Sehwag has weakness against moving ball.It is not like we have Sunil Gavaskar waiting in wings.

It was Rahul who he replaced , Dhawan never got so many chances as Rahul, I am sure he would have done better, I don't think anyone can do worse.

 

The moment Pandya stopped being part of Indian test team, India looked proper team.

 

Rohit has earned the right due to his performances in other formats.Did anyone stop Rahul or Rahane to score runs like Rohit did  in format they had been chosen and demand a place in the team in other formats.

 

Why you compare every shitty batsmen to sehwag....next time before you open your motormouth plz compare AVG and SR of sehwag to any batsmen in history of the game.

[Gollum]

Bewda is playing tabla on the testicles of Indian fans. 

Ek peg bottle rum

Teen tal 

Do bottle vodka

Dhrupad tal

Repeat

...

BDSM but who cares, most of our countrymen seem to be enjoying themselves. Ab batao kis kiska goti bhadve ke muh mein tha? 

Edited September 27, 2019 by Gollum

[bahubali]

@putrevus

 

Look at what a just retired player saying about this TM

https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/27711366/make-guys-secure-first-yuvraj-singh-blames-team-management-india-world-cup-2019-loss

You just keep gng on and on how good kohli is how great shaatti is, look at what Yuvraj is saying and it's no different than the general opinion what we share.

 

Disclaimer: plz don't rant that he is just bitter ,he may be but what he said in general is absolutely spot on.

[cricketfan28]

Good response , this is what the team needs.  Now the focus will move to Dhoni conspiracies.

[express bowling]

Does tapping on the sides of a whisky bottle qualify as playing tabla ?

[rtmohanlal]

would have been so better if  this moron played tabla all the time , but no way near the cricket team.

[Real McCoy]

It would be better if he played the tambura instead of fiddling with tabla while on the c.....i mean the rocks

[cricketfan28]

On 9/26/2019 at 9:35 AM, putrevus said:

They are backing Pant in all formats or why would he be playing all formats? People are making too much noise for nothing.

They think it is a Conspiracy to bring Dhoni back.

[Ankit_sharma03]

On 9/26/2019 at 4:46 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

"Don't say team management, I spoke about 'the rap on the knuckles'. If someone goofs up, I have to pull them up. Am I there only to play tabla? But this guy is world class, this guy can be destructive, can be a destroyer. And we will give him all the support that he needs to prosper in international cricket," Ravi Shastri told Hindustan Times.

"Pant is different, he is world class and is a brutal match-winner. Very few around in the world game; I can't pick five on my hands when it comes to white-ball cricket, T20 cricket. So the patience we will have with him is a lot.

"All your media reports and all the experts writing (but) Pant is in great space with this Indian team. Experts, they have a job, they can speak. Pant is a special kid and he has already done enough. And he is only going to learn. This team management will back him to the hilt."

[rkt.india]

Yeah teri to g**nd ka tabla banana padega 

Edited October 1, 2019 by rkt.india

[Moochad]

Key word in the article is white-ball cricket. Bewda and Rat don't seem as impressed with Pant in red ball format.