Jump to content

Pakistan bats better than India outside Asia in test cricket


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

No doubt..  They batted well in Australia as well compared to us.  Their bowling is ultra minnow level though 

 

They played on flat pitches. 

Posted

yeah lol thats why they are languishing at no.7 in rankings.

 

last time yasir shah got a fluke 100 when the match was already done and dusted. their top order batsmen except babar, were much more pathetic. azhar ali scored some 30 runs across 4 innings

Posted

unless you want to bring in yasir shah for ashwin or faheem ashraf for siraj this is silly reaction. Our bowlers do their primary job better and our top order is still not as bad as pakistani top order..

 

you want to feel bad, compare our team with England.. they definitely bat better in aus/nz/south africa than ours. pakistan is at the edge of test status now, there is no point in comparison at all

Posted
53 minutes ago, Serpico said:

unless you want to bring in yasir shah for ashwin or faheem ashraf for siraj this is silly reaction. Our bowlers do their primary job better and our top order is still not as bad as pakistani top order..

 

you want to feel bad, compare our team with England.. they definitely bat better in aus/nz/south africa than ours. pakistan is at the edge of test status now, there is no point in comparison at all

So i was curious how England batted last time they were in Australia. Went back to ashes and there were 9 times england was all out in an inning. Avg score 288. Lowest was 180 highest 491. 

 

India on the other hand (with 36ao) avg 212 per inning (min 36) avg 271. which isnt bad considering we dont have kohli

Posted
2 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said:

So i was curious how England batted last time they were in Australia. Went back to ashes and there were 9 times england was all out in an inning. Avg score 288. Lowest was 180 highest 491. 

 

India on the other hand (with 36ao) avg 212 per inning (min 36) avg 271. which isnt bad considering we dont have kohli

they also didn't have stokes last time

Posted

Our batting looks exceptionally weak. Pakistani batsmen performed better in NZ and that was without Babar. That should send alarm bells ringing . Unfortunately,  this will keep on happening and nobody really cares.  This will all be forgotten by the next IPL :)

Posted
43 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Our batting looks exceptionally weak. Pakistani batsmen performed better in NZ and that was without Babar. That should send alarm bells ringing . Unfortunately,  this will keep on happening and nobody really cares.  This will all be forgotten by the next IPL :)

Even before the IPL, when england tours india, everything will be forgotten. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

That's not a weak batting lineup . That's a trash batting lineup. Dhawan and Rohit in SENA tests? Lol. Rahane averages 35 since England series 2016. 


Well you are not talking about being champion team of world beaters. If the objective is to win in the mediocre state of world cricket, you don’t need batters of 55 plus average. you only need functional batter who will cross 300 for the team with some degree of assurance. 

perhaps you are still stuck in old ways of operating. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...