Jump to content

Time to move on from Baggage Bhuvaneshwar?


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Cricspin said:

Like I mentioned in match thread.. I don't get what he did wrong??

 

He was the most economical and took a very good catch in the field. Why people want his head when we don't have Bumrah,  Shami and even Natarajan??

 

He dint bowl fast but bowled well.. what is wrong with him playing??


how does he get ahead of Deepak Chahar?

 

or

 

England looked a different side with Wood and Archer and we have all 130k trundlers? Unacceptable in this day and age for Indian cricket. we don’t need a guy who breaks down before an important game anyways. Better try Navdeep Saini. If not some new exciting talent. We found Natarajan by chance who knows someone better and long term will surprise.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:


how does he get ahead of Deepak Chahar?

 

or

 

England looked a different side with Wood and Archer and we have all 130k trundlers? Unacceptable in this day and age for Indian cricket. we don’t need a guy who breaks down before an important game anyways. Better try Navdeep Saini. If not some new exciting talent. We found Natarajan by chance who knows someone better and long term will surprise.

 

Breaking news!

We won the  match .

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, beetle said:

 

Breaking news!

We won the  match .

 

 


Thanks to batting :winky: well bowled today though but I can think of atleast 5 other bowlers available who could have had a bigger upside than giving a guy who breaks down every 2-3 games, this kind of great exposure.

Posted

Bhuvi is a must for this Indian team but I don't think he needs to be playing every match. I don't think he has the ability to stop any batsmen from attacking on a flat pitch.

Posted
12 hours ago, Cricspin said:

Like I mentioned in match thread.. I don't get what he did wrong??

 

He was the most economical and took a very good catch in the field. Why people want his head when we don't have Bumrah,  Shami and even Natarajan??

 

He dint bowl fast but bowled well.. what is wrong with him playing??

Some people here are only obsessed with speed guns. And they believe reading speed guns on screen makes them geniuses and gives then super insights 

Posted (edited)

Bhuvi has declined in ODIs but in T20s and tests (in certain conditions like Eng, NZ, Dharamsala or 2016 NZ/Kolkata) he still adds value. Didn't watch the match, so can't comment on his bowling. But don't be harsh on him, coming back after lengthy injury related layoff, will take a few matches to shake off the rust and enable him to trust his body more. Domestic matches and net practice aren't enough, give him the full series against #1 side now that Nattu is ruled out. Bumrah will always be our first option, Pandya a certainty....to complete the squad we need more pacers, Nattu is a certainty (left arm angle, death bowling etc.), and Saini/Shardul/Bhuvi/Chahar competing for 2-3 more spots. So yeah Bhuvi is definitely no baggage, in this format ahead of Shami, Siraj and most other speed demons. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted

what kind of a thread this is....what has he done wrong? I thought BK was fantastic last night, and that catch was no less a game changer(there were many of those moments)

 

Looks like kids today has no patience at all :)

Posted

Seriously why are we carrying this guy? No wickets in PP, no speed to unsettle the batsman, harmless movement that even part timer can get, doesn’t bat, slow in the field.

 

Need to get a young blood on there or some other  bowler waiting his turn. Can be a backup but we are wasting time on him.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

Seriously why are we carrying this guy?

Baba have you seen the downvotes people give you when criticizing this guy? He obviously has too many fans for Brat to ignore :cantstop:

Edited by R!TTER
Posted (edited)

Let's see what people with "no agenda" have to say to this :hatsoff:

 

View overall figures [change view]
Opposition team Australia or England or New Zealand or Pakistan or Sri Lanka or West Indies
Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2014
Involving the player B Kumar (INDIA)
Qualifications wickets taken greater than or equal to 10
Ordered by bowling average (ascending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 8        Return to query menu
Cleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave Econ SR 4 5  
A Mishra 2014-2016 5 5 19.0 1 109 10 3/24 10.90 5.73 11.4 0 0  
Kuldeep Yadav 2017-2019 13 13 49.0 0 353 21 5/24 16.80 7.20 14.0 0 1  
JJ Bumrah 2016-2018 12 12 43.0 0 321 15 2/9 21.40 7.46 17.2 0 0  
RA Jadeja 2014-2019 11 11 32.3 1 264 10 3/48 26.40 8.12 19.5 0 0  
KH Pandya 2018-2019 11 11 43.3 1 377 12 4/36 31.41 8.66 21.7 1 0  
YS Chahal 2017-2021 16 16 60.3 0 518 16 3/43 32.37 8.56 22.6 0 0  
KK Ahmed 2018-2019 10 10 36.0 0 335 10 2/27 33.50 9.30 21.6 0 0  
B Kumar 2014-2021 32 32 112.2 0 822 22 2/12 37.36 7.31 30.6 0 0  
Edited by R!TTER
Posted

He is a poor lead bowler. He needs other guys to pick wickets while he does his containing job. And picking wickets is still critical in this format when the opposition starts gathering momentum.

 

Its all fine as a support bowler but he needs to do more when he is the main seamer. 

 

 

 

 

Posted

He bowled well. What's wrong with 27-0 in four overs?
Nattu, Bumrah and Bhuvi will be our 3 fast bowlers in wt20. All three of them are known for their eco. rates.

Posted
1 hour ago, nitinbwj said:

He is harmless. Doesn’t look like picking any wickets and opposition can score 35 runs easily without taking any risks.

Repeatedly beating bat, lbw appeals and edges does look like picking wicket to  blind speed gun fanatics 

Posted

Kohli didn't have the common sense to give him one more over with swinging ball to butler. Butler was not hitting him well at all and had just produced edges while trying to slog.  

 

This is the biggest short coming with Kohli, has zero instinct. 

Posted
1 hour ago, New guy said:

Repeatedly beating bat, lbw appeals and edges does look like picking wicket to  blind speed gun fanatics 

Ain’t no Mark wood. I would always prefer speed. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...