Jump to content

Pujara, Kohli, Rahane - all average below 30 since start of 2020 - why are they still guaranteed starters in a Test?


Texan

Recommended Posts

Posted

BCCI sleeping? Performances don't matter?

 

We got by because of some Pant innings, some good bowling and Rohit dominating at home, but otherwise, wouldn't someone have questioned such a poor performance by the middle order. 

Posted (edited)

Because there is no accountability for senior batsmen in Team India.

 

Whenever any questions are raised, the senior batsmen themselves provide superb self certifications like, " I do not care about what others are saying, I know I am good " or " Only important people get criticized " ... and they stay on !

 

Actual performances matter only if you are a youngster or a bowler.

Edited by express bowling
Posted

It was pretty clear what the problem we had in our batting,on the very day we suffered 36 ao in Australia

If there is a early wicket ,the middle order of kohli ,rahane and pujara is now utterly incapable of making runs ,but we let the win slide the apparent issues.

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Because there is no accountability for senior batsmen in Team India.

 

Whenever any questions are raised, the senior batsmen themselves provide superb self certifications like, " I do not care about what others are saying, I know I am good " or " Only important people get criticized " ... and they stay on !

 

Actual performances matter only if you are a youngster or a bowler.

I also wish to add that I don't see any genuine long-term investments in nurturing young batsmen who can take over.

Posted
Just now, express bowling said:

 

 

Gill and Sundar can replace 2 of the 3.

True, but we have not blooded them in the right positions against weak opponents, which is what a good team with long-term thinking would do. Gill was hastily shoved in as opener even though he could have played as middle order against Bang or some other team. Likewise, Sundar mostly played at 7 or 8, whereas he should have been given opportunities at 5 or 6.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

Because there is no accountability for senior batsmen in Team India.

 

Whenever any questions are raised, the senior batsmen themselves provide superb self certifications like, " I do not care about what others are saying, I know I am good " or " Only important people get criticized " ... and they stay on !

 

Actual performances matter only if you are a youngster or a bowler.

 

And they get backed by spineless senior commentators with certifications like "there are secret whispers happening about certain players"

Edited by bowl_out
Posted
52 minutes ago, Vijy said:

True, but we have not blooded them in the right positions against weak opponents, which is what a good team with long-term thinking would do. Gill was hastily shoved in as opener even though he could have played as middle order against Bang or some other team. Likewise, Sundar mostly played at 7 or 8, whereas he should have been given opportunities at 5 or 6.

 

That's never happened under Kohli. No young batsman has been given a decent run as seen as a threat rather than a talent to be nurtured. That's why Kohli and his retirement home continue to stink the place out.

Posted

Due to "form is temporary, class is permanent" theory. But I have never seen a collective terminal decline of an entire middle order in this fashion. These guys are repeatedly proving that they are not worthy of continued support of the selectors. They should take a break, fake an injury, retire outright or whatever it takes to get out of the playing X1. Or, the selectors should terminate their careers. Enough is enough.

Posted

the utmost  culprits here are  ex-players who always get diplomatic  in their comments. Even the likes of Sachin never speaks against any under performing player.

But when  team wins he has 1000  tongues to glorify the players who performed. Just can't understand their attitude  other than sucking to BCCI with  long term benefits in mind.There past players are the real culprits...

Posted
On 8/25/2021 at 12:35 PM, sarchasm said:

The fact that a bowler as successful and in-form as Ashwin is dropped without so much as a semblance of debate - even as Rahane and Pujara and Kohli carry on with their nonexistent form - is very curious. Like bowlers are just their to make up the numbers.

ashwin would have scored more than some of this trio - he has experience batting in eng conditions. and he is a far more penetrative spinner than Jaddu is on current form.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...