SecondSlip Posted November 4, 2024 Posted November 4, 2024 We beat England 4-1 on excellent pitches earlier in the year. Why didn’t we produce similar pitches here for the final 2 tests. We produced these **** rank turners instead which brought the NZ spinners into the game and shot ourselves in the foot like morons. I don’t understand why they even wanted dustbowls when you had great success with normal pitches against BazBallers. All we had to do was produce good pitches like we did for England and we most likely could have won this series to. Ashwin and Jadeja are more than good enough to take wickets on good tracks as well as they did against BazBall! Number 1
vvvslaxman Posted November 4, 2024 Posted November 4, 2024 They were hoping they would win the toss. Backfired. But that is not the only thing. India took the lead in the last test. In the second Test, NZ scored more runs in the 2nd innings than India scored in the 1st innings. India was exposed in various conditions. NZ looked more like a home team than India in this series.
ash Posted November 4, 2024 Posted November 4, 2024 Don’t think they are dustbowls tbh. Indian batsmen used to be good enough to score 300-400 on these pitches. Now they have regressed, that’s it.. sensible-indian and Lord 2
sensible-indian Posted November 4, 2024 Posted November 4, 2024 Sigh...we call everything dust bowls and rank turners these days. Until India gets good spin playing batsmen, this misconception wont die down. We are so used to seeing horrible batsmen with no technique that we rate pitches based on current bats performances. Lord, rollingstoned and Norman 2 1
Lord Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 13 hours ago, sensible-indian said: Sigh...we call everything dust bowls and rank turners these days. Until India gets good spin playing batsmen, this misconception wont die down. We are so used to seeing horrible batsmen with no technique that we rate pitches based on current bats performances. Exactly. Mitchell, Young and even Pant batted on same pitch and didnt have much problem. Lone Wolf 1
Lord Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 17 hours ago, SecondSlip said: We beat England 4-1 on excellent pitches earlier in the year. Why didn’t we produce similar pitches here for the final 2 tests. We produced these **** rank turners instead which brought the NZ spinners into the game and shot ourselves in the foot like morons. I don’t understand why they even wanted dustbowls when you had great success with normal pitches against BazBallers. All we had to do was produce good pitches like we did for England and we most likely could have won this series to. Ashwin and Jadeja are more than good enough to take wickets on good tracks as well as they did against BazBall! What was different in those pitches?
zen Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 I see a thread on this and that too on page 1 of this forum:
Trichromatic Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 If visiting team is scoring 250 then India should be scoring 350. It's not pitch restricting them to 150 and 120 Mariyam and Lord 1 1
Majestic Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 I think we took NZ for granted as our focus moved completely towards Australia series and also NZ’s last two tours to India were very bad despite them having Williamson in their team. We let the momentum shift towards NZ from first game and then the pitches that we played on after losing the test, the momentum of the game mattered a lot. We were always behind in the game, never really built extreme pressure and it is the combination of senior batters and senior spinners failing which costed us the series. AKane 1
vvvslaxman Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 Also look at the venues. ONe of the most commonly used IPL venues something even new zealanders are familiar with. Wankhede, Chinnaswamy. THey should have used places like Rajkot.
Lone Wolf Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 Because Ashwin and Jadeja till then had flopped and were getting outbowled.. Siraj and Bumrah were NPA's. So having dustbowls was only option left for them. But Rohit lost the toss both times lol...and Kiwis played spin better than us
Lone Wolf Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 2 hours ago, Lord said: Exactly. Mitchell, Young and even Pant batted on same pitch and didnt have much problem. It was a fine a** pitch indeed. Ashwin even said he expected a raging Turner in Mumbai like in 2021. But it was slow turn according to him (maybe it indicated he is finished or he is still delilu)
vvvslaxman Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 2 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Because Ashwin and Jadeja till then had flopped and were getting outbowled.. Siraj and Bumrah were NPA's. So having dustbowls was only option left for them. But Rohit lost the toss both times lol...and Kiwis played spin better than us Not only that. We used to have Umesh and Shami giving us break throughs with older ball. A guy like Southee would not have survived more than few balls against Shami. Bumrah for some reason is massively off color against NZ. May be they play him well. Shami , Bhuvi are more effective against them. Lone Wolf 1
Lord Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 22 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Because Ashwin and Jadeja till then had flopped and were getting outbowled.. Siraj and Bumrah were NPA's. So having dustbowls was only option left for them. But Rohit lost the toss both times lol...and Kiwis played spin better than us Batting sucked even worse. That way we should have prepared pattas
vvvslaxman Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 12 minutes ago, Lord said: Batting sucked even worse. That way we should have prepared pattas They were not even good enough to last more than 2 or 3 overs. Rohit sharma even during short stay had 2 or 3 lives. Still he couldn't capitalize on it. When you don't put enough runs on the board, bowlers cannot make up for it. Not only that Rohit sharma's catching was horrendous. Also key fielding positions were not employed by Rohit. His captaincy for spinners was one of the worst i have seen. Even Kohli was better than this. MSD was atleast good for setting fields for spinners. Having long on , long off right off the bat in the 2nd test was a cardinal sin. India was always playing catch up game with defensive mindset of Rohit. Rohit's defensive mindset was exposed many times even in LOIs. Thankfully some superstar performance saved his ass
Lone Wolf Posted November 5, 2024 Posted November 5, 2024 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Lord said: Batting sucked even worse. That way we should have prepared pattas Thing was batting was never going to match Kiwis on better tracks with NPA's like RoKo and lower middle order failing constantly which never used to happen. In England series we saw reinforcements at correct time. This time nothing of that sort happened and Batting unit was left brittle. Edited November 5, 2024 by Lone Wolf sensible-indian and Lord 2
rkt.india Posted November 6, 2024 Posted November 6, 2024 11 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Not only that. We used to have Umesh and Shami giving us break throughs with older ball. A guy like Southee would not have survived more than few balls against Shami. Bumrah for some reason is massively off color against NZ. May be they play him well. Shami , Bhuvi are more effective against them. Bumrah didn't bowl a single ball to Southee till they had 100+ partnership. express bowling 1
express bowling Posted November 6, 2024 Posted November 6, 2024 They prepared dustbowls because they wanted to rest our pacers before BGT. Mariyam 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now