Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, sandeep said:

our army and air force keep getting "surprised".  even by a much weaker adversary in Pak.  THere was very little accountability after 2019 and the loss of our jet and pilot.  In fact IAF Chief publicly made excuses like 'if only we had Rafales we'd have shown them'. what BS.  I mean, if you need to catalogue shopping and use that as an excuse for failure against a senemy like Pak, shame on you. 

 

And now again, gaping flaws in our air defense tactics have possibly been taken advantage of, and cost us some machines.  I still say, cheap lesson learnt, but only if we actually learn from it and start addressing the issues.

Added this in Edit:

aving said that, I will very much rule out India accepting they lost any planes. From a National Security pov, they can never release such data in the name of transparency. Why should it be transparent in that matter? Showng weaknesses is detrimental to future war efforst.

Posted
3 minutes ago, sandeep said:

our army and air force keep getting "surprised".  even by a much weaker adversary in Pak.  THere was very little accountability after 2019 and the loss of our jet and pilot.  In fact IAF Chief publicly made excuses like 'if only we had Rafales we'd have shown them'. what BS.  I mean, if you need to catalogue shopping and use that as an excuse for failure against a senemy like Pak, shame on you. 

 

And now again, gaping flaws in our air defense tactics have possibly been taken advantage of, and cost us some machines.  I still say, cheap lesson learnt, but only if we actually learn from it and start addressing the issues.

 

I think its also a mentality issue. India have mostly always been on the defensive in the west along jnk and punjab historically. They try to push the issue and then end up with errors. Pakistan is the same. Go to attack and leave holes.

 

Huge gap in indian and pak navies. But airforce the gap appears to be narrowest.

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, sandeep said:

yep, better that we lost a couple of jets against greenbros, than getting completely annihilated in a future skirmish with the PLAA.  IAF has been a laggard in modernizing for decades. I see it as a silver lining that their flaws and failures get spotlighted.


It also shows that American equipment is the best on the planet. We should have gone for F35s instead of Rafales. 
 

I don’t think PLAA is battle tested - Pak has been preparing for events like this only. 
 

I would love to see how impactful S400 snow - against PAFs possible retaliation - S400 is meant to detect and take out airborne PAF jets that are 300 kms deep inside Pak territory. 

Posted
1 minute ago, rangeelaraja said:


It also shows that American equipment is the best on the planet. We should have gone for F35s instead of Rafales. 
 

I don’t think PLAA is battle tested - Pak has been preparing for events like this only. 
 

I would love to see how impactful S400 snow - against PAFs possible retaliation - S400 is meant to detect and take out airborne PAF jets that are 300 kms deep inside Pak territory. 

we need S400 as a missile shield for the worst case scenario to protect our capital. That's a strategic choice. Once we did that, we were never gonna get Amreeki jets.

 

Rafale is fine, IAF's problem isn't just equipment, its overall tactics, deployment, and execution. THey aint up to snuff and need to get their **** together.  Yesterday.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

 

You are a doubting thomas aren't ya? If they didn't do anthing, you will be the first to say, what happened to all that talk after Ap23? If they did something,  you will say , what good is this going to do anyway? Damned if they do, damned if they don't.  

 

I believe more in IAF than anybody else. If they choose to do a presser with ladies, it is the best message given to Pakistan. Dekho hamare yahan aise hi hota hain. 

 

I am a taxpayer here and I know how much of tax dollars, economy has been diverted into funding the wars in Afg, Iraq, now Ukraine to take revenge after 9/11. It's not just economy. the legacy of an empire is at stake for USA.

He's the most __&&&&& poster in this forum,better talk to a wall than to him

He's always complaining,if Air Chief Marshall /COAS Sir Viraat Kohli had planned all these things he would have termed him GOAT military planner

Edited by Suhaan
Posted (edited)

China surprisingly has given a lip service called "Regrettable" and moved on to usual platitudes. I expected a condemnation. But they would prefer a productive india rather than the land of suicide bombers.

 

 

Edited by kepler37b
Posted
14 minutes ago, G_B_ said:

As i said, let the operation be over.

 

Pakistan simply cannot deny (like uri etc) india has struck 100km inside their territory. Its accepted.

 

Unlike 2019 when they captured abhinandan they also have no direct proof that jets were downed given indian jets have not left indian territory. They can only claim.

 

So this has been designed by Iaf to ensure Pakistan can claim but not verify.

 

However, ultimately we can overwhelm pakistan. We cannot do so with china. So if losses have happened this needs to be asked why.

Pakistani will retaliate. Its matter of time only. We will loose lives and weapons for nxt 2 months. Lets accept this fact that War on Western MSM has only one winner. Pakistan 

Posted
18 minutes ago, G_B_ said:

 

I think its also a mentality issue. India have mostly always been on the defensive in the west along jnk and punjab historically. They try to push the issue and then end up with errors. Pakistan is the same. Go to attack and leave holes.

 

Huge gap in indian and pak navies. But airforce the gap appears to be narrowest.

 

 

Pak's entire focus is India and defense.  It is easier to design the acquisition strategy that way. And Pak does not have any sort of indigenous manufacturing. So they simply prostate before chinks and get the equipment. 

 

India has to concentrate on Defense and deep strike abilities also. And also satisfy the "Swadeshi Only" gang. Difficult to define acquisition strategy for these many objectives. 

 

Mudiji wants swadeshi. But our generals are not confident. 

 

 

Again, this is my 2p opinion. Resident experts can chime in. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, deathmonger said:

 

I strongly agree to disagree, bro. We should not mix sports and politics, bro. We should keep playing Pak in cricket and not go to war wiith Pak. They are our bros, bro. We have more in common with Pakjabis in culture than Madrasis. Hamari Asha to ko unke Aman ke hawale karna hain bro. Very sad , bro with that meme. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, vayuu1 said:

 

 

Where is the pilot? if they caught him(alive or dead) Pak would have displayed without shame. Did the pilot eject over Pakistani-land and land in India? That does not seem possible. This is def belongs to a Pakistani air force.

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, kepler37b said:

Pak's entire focus is India and defense.  It is easier to design the acquisition strategy that way. And Pak does not have any sort of indigenous manufacturing. So they simply prostate before chinks and get the equipment. 

 

India has to concentrate on Defense and deep strike abilities also. And also satisfy the "Swadeshi Only" gang. Difficult to define acquisition strategy for these many objectives. 

 

Mudiji wants swadeshi. But our generals are not confident. 

 

 

Again, this is my 2p opinion. Resident experts can chime in. 

 

well if rafale has indeed been shot down...then generals need a new strategy

 

We are better off inducting masses of new planes which while not great in quality are expendable.

 

People say Russian tech is poor, but it is designed to be cheap so that losses can easily be absorbed.

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, mishra said:

Pakistani will retaliate. Its matter of time only. We will loose lives and weapons for nxt 2 months. Lets accept this fact that War on Western MSM has only one winner. Pakistan 

They will only continue to shell border areas, don't think they will escalate to border incursions or hit missiles deep into India. India should soon invest in Israeli defnce of detecting missile and downing their missiles. 

Posted

And believe me in our stand off vs China, the MIg29 was a star given that so called fancy Chinese jets were struggling with engine issues due to thin air.

 

What India needs is a desi version of Mig29 which is 4.5 gen and can be produced in masses.

 

Like it or not the JK17 is a garbage plane that can be produced and lost at will. 

 

 

Lets see which plane Pakistan uses to retaliate. Onus on them to attack soonish. India to defend. If F16 used and is downed then USA will be unhappy. If Chinese J10 used and downed then China will be unhappy. Considering our geographical depth in order to hit anything of major value Pak will need to cross over.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

They will only continue to shell border areas, don't think they will escalate to border incursions or hit missiles deep into India. India should soon invest in Israeli defnce of detecting missile and downing their missiles. 

They will strike through terrorists across india. That will be their retaliation. 

×
×
  • Create New...