Jump to content

Unfair to compare Root with 'phenomenal' Kohli: Pietersen


Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

Former England batsman Kevin Pietersen feels that it's an unfair comparison between Joe Root and Virat Kohli since the statistically the Indian Test captain is way ahead of the Yorkshire lad.

Going through a purple patch, Kohli has often being compared with England batsman Joe Root, which Pietersen feels isn't a fair comparison.

"Kohli is as good as it gets. He is right up there. Root has good numbers, but it's unfair to even compare Joe with Virat because his numbers are just phenomenal," Pietersen was quoted as saying by 'The Cricketer' magazine.

"He plays so aggressively - sometimes it's like - are you serious? The way he makes big runs for his team so often is just remarkable," he added.

Pointing out Kohli's record average of 60 in the second innings during ODI runchases, Pietersen said: "I switched on the TV and saw him play that 85 not out at Dharamsala [against New Zealand] – goodness, that was amazing.

"He just has that ability to rotate the strike and find boundaries. His ODI record is a joke. Such an old head on young-ish shoulders."

England will be up against a formidable spin trioka of off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin, left-armer Ravindra Jadeja and leg-spinner Amit Mishra during their bilateral series against India.

 
 

KP said England need to watch out for the doosra from Ashwin, who has been in red-hot form, picking up 153 wickets in 22 Tests at home.

The Chennai offie scalped 27 wickets to help India blank New Zealand 3-0 in the recently concluded series and Pietersen said: "Ashwin is a good bowler. He uses his variations very well, especially the way he approaches the crease. He's always looking to attack and outfox a batsman.

"When I've played against him, I could pick his doosra, so I was OK. But if England's batsmen can't pick his doosra they'll have issues. The low bounce might make it harder, but that's part of the challenge of playing in India.

"Batsmen have got to find themselves a boundary option in India. It's all about rotating the strike and maneuvering the field. I was OK in India. I enjoyed it there. I made plenty of hundreds there," he added.

The last time England toured India in 2012, they had beaten the hosts 2-1. However, this time England is coming into the Test series after a shocking defeat to Bangladesh in the second Test at Dhaka.

The first match of the series will be played at Rajkot from November 9. 

http://www.rediff.com/cricket/report/unfair-to-compare-root-with-phenomenal-kohli-pietersen-india-england/20161103.htm

Posted

For me the best test batsman currently are 

Root/Rahane - Top

then 

Younis Khan/Smith/Kane- 2nd best

and then

Pujara/Kohli

 

Kohli, most likely will surpass all and will be the best among all as his one day game will surely bring his average up in test cricket. He is already rising and with captaincy now under him, he is going to progress into becoming the best in the world.

 

but as of now, Rahane and Root for me are the best over anyone.

 

 

 

 

Posted
For me the best tedt batsman currently are 

Root/Rahane - Top

then 

Younis Khan/Smith - 2nd best

and then

Pujara/Kohli

 

Kohli, most likely willsurpass all and will be the best among all as his one day game will surely bring his average up in test cricket. He is already rising and with captaincy now under him, he is going to progress into becoming the bedt in the world.

 

but as of now, Rahane and Root for me are the best over anyone.

 

 

 

 

You forgot Kane....he is probably the best....even ahead of Root and Rahane

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Root is arguably the 2nd best batsman in the world. Kohli's probably not even the 2nd best batsman in his team. So yeah it's quite an unfair comparison.

KP was talking " all-format-performances " ....not just test matches.

 

In test matches played in the last 3 years, Kohli has actually been the 2nd best batsman in his team after Rahane, whether the parameter is batting averages or scoring all over the world.

 

Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS AveDescending BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
AM Rahane 2013-2016 28 48 7 2201 188 53.68 4095 53.74 8 9 3 258 19 investigate this query
V Kohli 2013-2016 30 51 1 2379 211 47.58 4089 58.18 9 6 2 275 4 investigate this query
CA Pujara 2013-2016 25 42 2 1675 153 41.87 3650 45.89 4 7 2 206 3 investigate this query
M Vijay 2013-2016 26 45 1 1784 150 40.54 3939 45.29 3 11 3 219 13 investigate this query
KL Rahul 2014-2016 9 15 0 562 158 37.46 1020 55.09 3 1 0 65 6 investigate this query
RG Sharma 2013-2016 21 36 4 1184 177 37.00 2181 54.28 2 7 4 115 25 investigate this query
S Dhawan 2013-2016 22 38 1 1277 173 34.51 2268 56.30 3 3 4 159 3 investigate this query
WP Saha 2014-2016 16 22 4 610 104 33.88 1355 45.01 1 4 3 63 5 investigate this query
R Ashwin 2013-2016 23 33 5 894 124 31.92 1752 51.02 3 3 1 89 6 investigate this query
MS Dhoni 2013-2014 13 23 1 667 82 30.31 1239 53.83 0 5 2 92 3 investigate this query
RA Jadeja 2013-2016 15 25 4 527 68 25.09 815 64.66 0 2 2 63 12

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=5;qualval1=matches;spanmax1=04+Nov+2016;spanmin1=04+Nov+2013;spanval1=span;team=6;template=results;type=batting

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
6 minutes ago, gakgupta said:

You forgot Kane....he is probably the best....even ahead of Root and Rahane

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

Yes Forgott him.  One of the best for me as well but not the best as struggled in India but still one of the best and has been rightly put right next to Kohli. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

Yes Forgott him.  One of the best for me as well but not the best as struggled in India but still one of the best and has been rightly put right next to Kohli. 

Thing is, except for Tendulkar and Gavaskar, i cannot think of a batsman who hasn't struggled somewhere or another.

kallis averages 35 in England & Sri Lanka, Ponting in India averages like 26, Dravid in South Africa averages 29, Lara averages 33 in India and 36 in New Zealand, Sangakkara averages 36 in India and 35 in South Africa, Steve Waugh averages 36 in New Zealand and 16 in Sri Lanka, Viv averages 19 in New Zealand, Miandad averages 38 in Aus, 33 in WI and 15 in Sri lanka. Even the great Sobers averages 15 in NZ and 32 in Pakistan.

 

Now, i am not saying that Kane is in the same class (he is not), but i think the whole 'he struggled/failed in ABC nation' is not an argument against greatness in batsmen. Because as stats show us, its pretty much the rarest of rare greats who do well everywhere.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Thing is, except for Tendulkar and Gavaskar, i cannot think of a batsman who hasn't struggled somewhere or another.

kallis averages 35 in England & Sri Lanka, Ponting in India averages like 26, Dravid in South Africa averages 29, Lara averages 33 in India and 36 in New Zealand, Sangakkara averages 36 in India and 35 in South Africa, Steve Waugh averages 36 in New Zealand and 16 in Sri Lanka, Viv averages 19 in New Zealand, Miandad averages 38 in Aus, 33 in WI and 15 in Sri lanka. Even the great Sobers averages 15 in NZ and 32 in Pakistan.

 

Now, i am not saying that Kane is in the same class (he is not), but i think the whole 'he struggled/failed in ABC nation' is not an argument against greatness in batsmen. Because as stats show us, its pretty much the rarest of rare greats who do well everywhere.

 

That is the same reason why I still have KoHli and Kane still as one of the best in the world but just a little below Rahane and Root and feel they both will eventually score runs where they have not yet scored.  

 

I rate both very highly. As I have already stated Kohli will surpass them all. And the Nostradamus in me already predicted him being part of the Indin team and being India's future captain back in 2007 when he had not even been picked in Indian team :)

 

ICF archived threads are proof. May be one day over the weekend, I will try to find those threads. :) 

Posted (edited)

Failing in one or two countries is common for top batsmen....like Root has done in Australia, Bangladesh and NZ.  But acute weakness against a type of bowling in general would raise question marks over the greatness of a batsman.  How Root fares in the subcontinent in test matches would be interesting to watch.  He has failed in Bangladesh and  not played in Sri  Lanka. Let's see how he does in India this series.

Edited by express bowling
Posted

India under Kohli and Dhoni in test are two complete different teams, different levels, Kohli will into intimidate n make em nervous, he by his sheer presence, ability to play that inning to take his team to victory, the control, the calculativeness, the aggression, as if he is on auto pilot, Kohli to me is the greatest ODI player ever, n will go onto become the greatest batsmen of all time, even Sachin did not have the ability to close matches the way he does, to play chance less innings, to be the biggest factor in a teams win or loss , as heis

Posted (edited)

I would rate Root and Kane over Kohli in tests so far in their careers. Smith is very underrated but what he has been doing is just off the charts. Unlike Root Smith has scored runs everywhere he has played. Kohli still has lot of work to do in tests, he just does not inspire the same confidence of ODIs when batting in tests.

Edited by putrevus
Posted

Root has been very consistent but mostly at home.  Looks better in tests than Kohli and that's not just stats.  But this India series is big for him - needs to be seen whether he can do well in foreign conditions.  

Posted

KP can talk boss, he played well in India , had a pretty good IPL stint. Cook probably is a better bat than KP, but KP can certainly say what he feels like, we like him here in India.

Posted
10 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Thing is, except for Tendulkar and Gavaskar, i cannot think of a batsman who hasn't struggled somewhere or another.

kallis averages 35 in England & Sri Lanka, Ponting in India averages like 26, Dravid in South Africa averages 29, Lara averages 33 in India and 36 in New Zealand, Sangakkara averages 36 in India and 35 in South Africa, Steve Waugh averages 36 in New Zealand and 16 in Sri Lanka, Viv averages 19 in New Zealand, Miandad averages 38 in Aus, 33 in WI and 15 in Sri lanka. Even the great Sobers averages 15 in NZ and 32 in Pakistan.

 

Now, i am not saying that Kane is in the same class (he is not), but i think the whole 'he struggled/failed in ABC nation' is not an argument against greatness in batsmen. Because as stats show us, its pretty much the rarest of rare greats who do well everywhere.

 

I dont know how you got that ( cricinfo probably), but i would like to see Hayden,KP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...