Jump to content

We could have won this 3-0


Gambit

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not really. We lost by big margins. Our batting was half baked. We had chance in second test first innings to make a big score but otherwise they just kept finding ways to take our wickets regularly. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Adi_91 said:

Danda, still going to stick with Willow TV subscription?

No the plan is to cancel today. I don't have the desire to watch meaningless ODI/T-tonty. Don't laugh, but I am having trouble figuring out how to cancel online. I activated on Apple TV 4K and can't see an option on my willow account to cancel subscription. :giggle:

Posted

Add to that, the series confirmed also how much getting familiar with conditions matters. Should have come early and had practice games, instead of using the first couple of tests to get comfortable in SA.

Posted
20 minutes ago, CoverDrive said:

Not really. We lost by big margins. Our batting was half baked. We had chance in second test first innings to make a big score but otherwise they just kept finding ways to take our wickets regularly. 

We should have won first after SA were 12/3 in first innings if not for dropped catches. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, CoverDrive said:

Not really. We lost by big margins. Our batting was half baked. We had chance in second test first innings to make a big score but otherwise they just kept finding ways to take our wickets regularly. 

Ummm, no? Take the whole match into contention and we had a brilliant chance to seal the series. It's these selection errors that led to us chasing those scores in the 4th innings.

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, dandaroy said:

No the plan is to cancel today. I don't have the desire to watch meaningless ODI/T-tonty. Don't laugh, but I am having trouble figuring out how to cancel online. I activated on Apple TV 4K and can't see an option on my willow account to cancel subscription. :giggle:

Cancelled. I will find out about the series on this forum and Cricinfo. Good luck India. See you in England. Don’t phuck up again. 

Edited by dandaroy
Posted

Yes we could have won 3-0 . So stop slagging of the team . Shows how good we are 

 

so many lessons from this series . Not just from kohli but players . Individual would have learnt so much from this and be better for it 

 

we gonna get better and better . Look out 

Posted

In hindsight, I feel this series loss was necessary, if only to help Virat realize how important it is to prepare properly and pick the right players to win oversees. He batted really well but the rest of the batsmen struggled.

 

The team management need to be firm and demand that the BCCIdiots don't organize pointless bilaterals before important overseas tours. If the lessons from this series are learnt, we'll be able to do well in Eng, Aus and NZ. 

Posted (edited)

Serious question did India exceed expectations  in any department or was a let down in another?

 

Bowling- I believe everyone unanimously agreed this was the best fastbowling set to tour overseas  ever. Lived up to their expectations. Their quick adaptability to different conditions was questioned which is what exactly the did in the first innings of the first test. Only pleasant surprise was Ashwin exceeding expectation and Pandya chipping in at times.

 

Batting- Most cricket lovers knew that this is no longer the golden age of Indian batting and a group of 2-3 players should fire at once to set up a chance.  It was more or less a one man show with Kohli....Consistency of Rahane,Vijay....adaptability of Pujara,Rohit and Dhawan were all mentioned and that came  true at one point or the other.

 

Fielding- especially catching was expected to be piss poor and the only test we upped our fielding we won. Wasn’t this a given at the start of the tour?

 

so  again I ask how come people were expecting a 3-0 drubbing of South Africa....based on what we thought a closely contested series to South Africa was pretty much the popular vote and that’s what happened. 2-1 was the perfect result.

 

 

It wasn’t a case of overestimating South Africa but looking in house at our own weaknesses.

 

 

Edited by maniac
Posted
26 minutes ago, maniac said:

Serious question did India exceed expectations  in any department or was a let down in another?

 

Bowling- I believe everyone unanimously agreed this was the best fastbowling set to tour overseas  ever. Lived up to their expectations. Their quick adaptability to different conditions was questioned which is what exactly the did in the first innings of the first test. Only pleasant surprise was Ashwin exceeding expectation and Pandya chipping in at times.

 

Batting- Most cricket lovers knew that this is no longer the golden age of Indian batting and a group of 2-3 players should fire at once to set up a chance.  It was more or less a one man show with Kohli....Consistency of Rahane,Vijay....adaptability of Pujara,Rohit and Dhawan were all mentioned and that came  true at one point or the other.

 

Fielding- especially catching was expected to be piss poor and the only test we upped our fielding we won. Wasn’t this a given at the start of the tour?

 

so  again I ask how come people were expecting a 3-0 drubbing of South Africa....based on what we thought a closely contested series to South Africa was pretty much the popular vote and that’s what happened. 2-1 was the perfect result.

 

 

It wasn’t a case of overestimating South Africa but looking in house at our own weaknesses.

 

 

Very good points. The only place where I thought there should have been improvement was fielding. In all 3 tests, we were in the game in the second innings, but our fielding blew it up in the second game especially.

Posted

Apart from the poor preparation and selections, I actually think Kohli and co. we're surprised by the strength of the pace attack. Saffers usually play 3 seamers and a spinner and last time we hammered Tahir and forced the seamers to bowl extra overs. They did their homework and went in with atleast 4 quicks which meant that there was no respite from pace . It was a gamble that paid off well for them being one batsman light. A team without match practice in these conditions were bound to struggle against Morkel,philtrundler,Rabada and Steyn/Ngidi. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Apart from the poor preparation and selections, I actually think Kohli and co. we're surprised by the strength of the pace attack. Saffers usually play 3 seamers and a spinner and last time we hammered Tahir and forced the seamers to bowl extra overs. They did their homework and went in with atleast 4 quicks which meant that there was no respite from pace . It was a gamble that paid off well for them being one batsman light. A team without match practice in these conditions were bound to struggle against Morkel,philtrundler,Rabada and Steyn/Ngidi. 

Is this your twitter handle?

 

https://twitter.com/criccrazyniks?lang=en

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...