Jump to content

Duncan Fletcher, the unsung hero


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, GolGappe said:

What a crock of English shite.

 

Worst coach in India's cricket history.

 

How the heck Dhoni and Fletcher were allowed to  carry on after all those  poor overseas results is beyond me.

 

Shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath as Wright and Kirsten.

Kirsten was just their at the right time.  When it was time to build a team, he left.

Edited by rkt.india
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Kirsten was just their at the right time.  When it was time to build a team, he left.

trust one of biggest opportunist, the hard work after the world cup exit was done by seniors in conjunction with Chandu Borde and Lalchand Rajput. Thereafter highly motivated Dhoni took over.What did Kirsten brought to the table apart from throwdowns and pre match sex theories iirc

Link to comment
30 minutes ago, Unleashed said:

Nick Compton should * off. All the credit goes to Kohli and Kohli only. These bowlers would've looked half their usual self if Dhoni was the captain.

 

Also never forget that it was Duncan Fletcher which decided to play Vinay Kumar at WACA.

These are due to systematic changes at grassroot levels of Indian cricket, not because of Kohli.

Link to comment
45 minutes ago, Unleashed said:

Nick Compton should * off. All the credit goes to Kohli and Kohli only. These bowlers would've looked half their usual self if Dhoni was the captain.

 

Also never forget that it was Duncan Fletcher which decided to play Vinay Kumar at WACA.

Agree, kohli should get the credit, he had massive role in this, all our pacers are bowling fastish to fast to fast medium under his captaincy and we all know what happened under pathetic dhoni.

Edited by speedheat
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

These are due to systematic changes at grassroot levels of Indian cricket, not because of Kohli.

Grassroots changes have got * all to do with Ishant, Shami, Bhuvi. Infact let's see the stats. Dhoni retired from captaincy on 30th Dec 2014(http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/814975.html), so I'm posting the stats from 1st Jan 2015 and before that.

Ishant

filtered 2007-2014 61 526 31* 9.06 0 187 7/74 37.30 6 13 0

-28.23

filtered 2015-2018 24 73 11 4.86 0 62 5/51 28.70 2 4 0 -23.84


Ishant bowling average pre-kohli is 37. With Kohli it's 28.

 

Bhuvi

filtered 2013-2014 11 343 63* 24.50 0 28 6/82 30.25 2 4 0

-5.74

 

filtered 2015-2018 10 209 33 19.00 0 35 5/33 22.77 2 4 0

-3.77

 

Bhuvi bowling average pre kohli is 30. With Kohli its 22.

 

Shami

filtered 11 150 51* 11.53 0 41 5/47 37.90 1 1 0 -26.36
filtered 2015-2018 22 266 30 14.00 0 77 5/28 25.42 2 6 0 -11.42

 

Shami bowling average pre kohli is 38. With Kohli it's 25.

 

 

Link to comment

Believe it or not, IPL has played a big role in Indian pace revolution. It's not that T20 cricket helped us, the peer group you get in IPL plays a big role in learning good habits, Ishant Sharma has been a different bowler ever since he has played alongside Dale Steyn.

Indian bowlers don't have that natural god gifted flair to bowl fast like West Indies of 80s or Pakistan of 90s, but the global nutrition experts and coaches did train our bowlers fitness wise to bowl fast.

Link to comment

It is more due to the fast bowling culture which has developed in the last 20 years. Days are not far where we will move to the next level and produce express bowlers regularly. With those sheer number of people, it is bound to happen once the culture is there. 

 

Off course everyone would like to claim credit, but if I have to point to one thing - it is the penetration of TV to all the remote corners of the country - of which the IPL also is the offshoot.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, eternalhope said:

It is more due to the fast bowling culture which has developed in the last 20 years. Days are not far where we will move to the next level and produce express bowlers regularly. With those sheer number of people, it is bound to happen once the culture is there. 

 

Off course everyone would like to claim credit, but if I have to point to one thing - it is the penetration of TV to all the remote corners of the country - of which the IPL also is the offshoot.

I don’t think we need express bowlers they don’t have long careers. We want people to bowl with high speeds of 145-147. That should be enough. 

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Unleashed said:

Grassroots changes have got * all to do with Ishant, Shami, Bhuvi. Infact let's see the stats. Dhoni retired from captaincy on 30th Dec 2014(http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/814975.html), so I'm posting the stats from 1st Jan 2015 and before that.

Ishant

filtered 2007-2014 61 526 31* 9.06 0 187 7/74 37.30 6 13 0

-28.23

filtered 2015-2018 24 73 11 4.86 0 62 5/51 28.70 2 4 0 -23.84


Ishant bowling average pre-kohli is 37. With Kohli it's 28.

 

Bhuvi

filtered 2013-2014 11 343 63* 24.50 0 28 6/82 30.25 2 4 0

-5.74

 

filtered 2015-2018 10 209 33 19.00 0 35 5/33 22.77 2 4 0

-3.77

 

Bhuvi bowling average pre kohli is 30. With Kohli its 22.

 

Shami

filtered 11 150 51* 11.53 0 41 5/47 37.90 1 1 0 -26.36
filtered 2015-2018 22 266 30 14.00 0 77 5/28 25.42 2 6 0 -11.42

 

Shami bowling average pre kohli is 38. With Kohli it's 25.

 

 

eye opening.

 

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Unleashed said:

Grassroots changes have got * all to do with Ishant, Shami, Bhuvi. Infact let's see the stats. Dhoni retired from captaincy on 30th Dec 2014(http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/814975.html), so I'm posting the stats from 1st Jan 2015 and before that.

Ishant

filtered 2007-2014 61 526 31* 9.06 0 187 7/74 37.30 6 13 0

-28.23

filtered 2015-2018 24 73 11 4.86 0 62 5/51 28.70 2 4 0 -23.84


Ishant bowling average pre-kohli is 37. With Kohli it's 28.

 

Bhuvi

filtered 2013-2014 11 343 63* 24.50 0 28 6/82 30.25 2 4 0

-5.74

 

filtered 2015-2018 10 209 33 19.00 0 35 5/33 22.77 2 4 0

-3.77

 

Bhuvi bowling average pre kohli is 30. With Kohli its 22.

 

Shami

filtered 11 150 51* 11.53 0 41 5/47 37.90 1 1 0 -26.36
filtered 2015-2018 22 266 30 14.00 0 77 5/28 25.42 2 6 0 -11.42

 

Shami bowling average pre kohli is 38. With Kohli it's 25.

 

 

1. Ishant's average has been consistently dropping since Aug 2011.

 

year 2014   8 14 346.0 60 1192 38 7/74 9/162 31.36 3.44 54.6 3 0 view innings
year 2015   7 12 159.0 42 441 14 5/54 8/86 31.50 2.77 68.1 1 0 view innings
year 2016   5 9 115.0 26 316 11 2/30 3/59 28.72 2.74 62.7 0 0 view innings
year 2017   6 12 179.3 35 528 14 3/37 5/80 37.71 2.94 76.9 0 0 view innings
year 2018   6 11 162.0 25 495 23 5/51 6/97 21.52 3.05 42.2 1 0 view innings

 

3 five wicket hauls in 2014 and that's where his good bowling performances became consistent. Last year he averaged 38 with ball. Ishant started on this curve much earlier and found his consistency during Dhoni's captaincy only. 

 

2. Umesh Yadav

*MS Dhoni 2011-2014 10 18 305.0 36 1247 40 5/93 7/103 31.17 4.08 45.7 1 0 view innings
*V Kohli 2015-2018 25 50 646.0 131 2127 55 4/32 6/71 38.67 3.29 70.4 0 0 view innings

 

3. Shami

year 2013   4 8 124.1 15 445 17 5/47 9/118 26.17 3.58 43.8 1 0 view innings
year 2014   7 13 287.5 44 1109 24 4/70 6/219 46.20 3.85 71.9 0 0 view innings
year 2015   1 2 34.3 3 145 6 5/112 6/145 24.16 4.20 34.5 1 0 view innings
year 2016   10 19 271.1 52 779 29 4/66 6/116 26.86 2.87 56.1 0 0 view innings
year 2017   5 10 137.5 34 446 19 4/100 6/134 23.47 3.23 43.5 0 0 view innings
year 2018   6 11 167.1 29 588 23 5/28 6/74 25.56 3.51 43.6 1 0 view innings

 

Did well in start under Dhoni, didn't find conditions to his liking in 2014 and then showcased his talent again later. I see only 2014 as an outlier in his career. Then he struggled in England and still struggling in this series with average of 40. Aus were flat pitches and we haven't played in Aus recently. 

 

4. Bhuvi 

year 2013   6 11 104.0 18 341 9 3/31 3/60 37.88 3.27 69.3 0 0 view innings
year 2014   5 7 172.5 45 506 19 6/82 6/103 26.63 2.92 54.5 2 0 view innings
year 2015   1 2 42.0 5 168 1 1/46 1/168 168.00 4.00 252.0 0 0 view innings
year 2016   4 7 85.4 24 195 13 5/33 6/46 15.00 2.27 39.5 2 0 view innings
year 2017   3 6 86.3 27 231 11 4/8 8/96 21.00 2.67 47.1 0 0 view innings
year 2018   2 4 67.0 22 203 10 4/87 6/120 20.30 3.02 40.2 0 0 view innings

 

His improvement curve started much earlier and anyone who followed his career knows that he was good swing bowler who started gaining pace by himself. 

 

You're giving credit to Kohli for his performance when he dropped Bhuvi after being best bowler in first test in SA? 

 

Statement you're looking for is - Bhuvi has been doing well despite Kohli's captaincy, not because of Kohli's captaincy.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

1. Ishant's average has been consistently dropping since Aug 2011.

 

year 2014   8 14 346.0 60 1192 38 7/74 9/162 31.36 3.44 54.6 3 0 view innings
year 2015   7 12 159.0 42 441 14 5/54 8/86 31.50 2.77 68.1 1 0 view innings
year 2016   5 9 115.0 26 316 11 2/30 3/59 28.72 2.74 62.7 0 0 view innings
year 2017   6 12 179.3 35 528 14 3/37 5/80 37.71 2.94 76.9 0 0 view innings
year 2018   6 11 162.0 25 495 23 5/51 6/97 21.52 3.05 42.2 1 0 view innings

 

3 five wicket hauls in 2014 and that's where his good bowling performances became consistent. Last year he averaged 38 with ball. Ishant started on this curve much earlier and found his consistency during Dhoni's captaincy only. 

 

2. Umesh Yadav

*MS Dhoni 2011-2014 10 18 305.0 36 1247 40 5/93 7/103 31.17 4.08 45.7 1 0 view innings
*V Kohli 2015-2018 25 50 646.0 131 2127 55 4/32 6/71 38.67 3.29 70.4 0 0 view innings

 

3. Shami

year 2013   4 8 124.1 15 445 17 5/47 9/118 26.17 3.58 43.8 1 0 view innings
year 2014   7 13 287.5 44 1109 24 4/70 6/219 46.20 3.85 71.9 0 0 view innings
year 2015   1 2 34.3 3 145 6 5/112 6/145 24.16 4.20 34.5 1 0 view innings
year 2016   10 19 271.1 52 779 29 4/66 6/116 26.86 2.87 56.1 0 0 view innings
year 2017   5 10 137.5 34 446 19 4/100 6/134 23.47 3.23 43.5 0 0 view innings
year 2018   6 11 167.1 29 588 23 5/28 6/74 25.56 3.51 43.6 1 0 view innings

 

Did well in start under Dhoni, didn't find conditions to his liking in 2014 and then showcased his talent again later. I see only 2014 as an outlier in his career. Then he struggled in England and still struggling in this series with average of 40. Aus were flat pitches and we haven't played in Aus recently. 

 

4. Bhuvi 

year 2013   6 11 104.0 18 341 9 3/31 3/60 37.88 3.27 69.3 0 0 view innings
year 2014   5 7 172.5 45 506 19 6/82 6/103 26.63 2.92 54.5 2 0 view innings
year 2015   1 2 42.0 5 168 1 1/46 1/168 168.00 4.00 252.0 0 0 view innings
year 2016   4 7 85.4 24 195 13 5/33 6/46 15.00 2.27 39.5 2 0 view innings
year 2017   3 6 86.3 27 231 11 4/8 8/96 21.00 2.67 47.1 0 0 view innings
year 2018   2 4 67.0 22 203 10 4/87 6/120 20.30 3.02 40.2 0 0 view innings

 

His improvement curve started much earlier and anyone who followed his career knows that he was good swing bowler who started gaining pace by himself. 

 

You're giving credit to Kohli for his performance when he dropped Bhuvi after being best bowler in first test in SA? 

 

Statement you're looking for is - Bhuvi has been doing well despite Kohli's captaincy, not because of Kohli's captaincy.

There's been loads of cases in previous years where our bowlers have deteriorated after playing 2 years of international cricket. There've been a lot of memes about Indian pacebowlers starting with a bang and then becoming trundlers, therefore the "improvement curve" point is fairly useless when talking in context of Indian bowlers. 


It's hilarious how you actually said that improvement at grassroots level is the reason behind the improvement of our current fast bowlers? Do you even know what grassroots actually means? Improvement at grassroots levels is the reason behind the emergence of Mavi, Nagarkotti.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Unleashed said:

There's been loads of cases in previous years where our bowlers have deteriorated after playing 2 years of international cricket. There've been a lot of memes about Indian pacebowlers starting with a bang and then becoming trundlers, therefore the "improvement curve" point is fairly useless when talking in context of Indian bowlers. 


It's hilarious how you actually said that improvement at grassroots level is the reason behind the improvement of our current fast bowlers? Do you even know what grassroots actually means? Improvement at grassroots levels is the reason behind the emergence of Mavi, Nagarkotti.

And you believe Mavi and Nagarkoti are recent sudden changes.

 

Indian pace bowling has been upgrading continuously for last 15 years.

 

First we moved on from regular trundlers to bunch of decent pacers like Zak, Sreesanth, RP Singh, Pathan who won us tests everywhere unlike their predecessors. But this upgrade had hits and misses. 

 

Next gen sustained pace for more than 2 years and has now started showing bowling accumen.

 

Next generation after this will be better with sustained pace, better bowling knowledge and lower averages.

 

But keep believing these are just sudden miraculous changes in last 3 years because of captain while conveniently hard work of people behind scene for last 15 years.

Link to comment

Combination of Kohli and Shankar Basu, the fitness trainer for our national team, have a lot to do with the improvement of our fast bowling unit in test matches from mid-2015.  The strength, endurance  and fitness training put in place have worked wonders regarding our pacers sustaining intensity and pace throughout the day. 

 

Bharat Arun has played a part too. The training system including workload management, for our national team fast bowlers now is very scientific.

 

Facilities and coaches at the NCA have also had a role to play regarding training and rehabilitation of pacers during non-match times.

 

Regarding the issue of lots of good quality young quick bowlers coming up in India nowadays, the biggest factors are  ----    the Emergence of fast bowling culture in India including fitness and gym culture ... top quality training methods, coaches  and infrastructure in India now including the NCA ... our exchange program with Australia ... our economic strength as a country in the last few years which is making the youngsters confident and providing infrastructure too.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...