Bhuvneswar Kumar ODI bowling discussion thread

[flamy]

Ganguly finished exactly on 100 wickets? 

[zen]

2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

strike rate is poorer than Ganguly lol

Ganguly has bowled less balls but has as many 4+ wkts hauls with more 5-ers

[vvvslaxman]

Look at the strike rate of Ishant. wow. Best among everyone

[Nikola]

Ganguly has more fifers. If he would have worked bit hard as dravid says he would have been useful allrounder for team india.

 

Ganguly (Stats vs Top teams of his era):

 

Bhuvi (Stats vs Top Teams): 

Edited January 14, 2019 by Nikola

[Zero_Unit]

it's a shame really LMAO. 

[zen]

Sir Agarkar .... 10 4ers + 2 5-sers

[vvvslaxman]

2 minutes ago, Nikola said:

Ganguly has more fifers. If he would have worked bit hard as dravid says he would have been useful allrounder for team india.

 

Ganguly (Stats vs Top teams of his era):

 

Bhuvi (Stats vs Top Teams): 

This is "permanently droppable" stat. He basically bullied the Asian sides?

[Nikola]

7 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

This is "permanently droppable" stat. He basically bullied the Asian sides?

Yep bhuvi's stats vs SENA countries is poor and his stats in SA, Aus is 100-150 avg per wicket. He has bullied pakistan, srilankan and lower ranked side. 

Edited January 14, 2019 by Nikola

[vvvslaxman]

7 minutes ago, Nikola said:

Yep bhuvi's stats vs SENA countries is poor and his stats in SA, Aus is 100-150 avg per wicket. He has bullied pakistan, srilankan and lower ranked side. 

Agarkar who has a far better stats were constantly ridiculed by fans. I think for now they should keep him for Tests especially in England/SA. But we have a lot of swing bowlers coming through. Won't be long before he loses that spot as well. He has to dramatically improve as a fast bowler. Attitude, aggression, stamina, energy.

[Nikola]

2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Agarkar who has a far better stats were constantly ridiculed by fans. I think for now they should keep him for Tests especially in England/SA. But we have a lot of swing bowlers coming through. Won't be long before he loses that spot as well. He has to dramatically improve as a fast bowler. Attitude, aggression, stamina, energy.

Why still expecting from him? Did Munaf, RP Singh, Sreesanth, Irfan Pathan kind of bowler get same amount of backing like he got? Those bowlers played when we didn't have decent bowlers in domestic circuit but now that we have so many bowlers but we still want bhuvi to become fit, aggressive with attitude and all but not try other bowlers.

[raki05]

16 minutes ago, zen said:

Sir Agarkar .... 10 4ers + 2 5-sers

Sir Aggy is best odi fast bowlers from india and I think only behined two Ws from pak in wkt tally. 

[Vilander]

Ganguly Sachin and Sehwag were riddiculous in their second skill. Just a bunch of freak skilled cricketers who happened to play in same time.

[zen]

1 minute ago, Vilander said:

Ganguly Sachin and Sehwag were riddiculous in their second skill. Just a bunch of freak skilled cricketers who happened to play in same time.

And Dravid could keep wkts 

[vvvslaxman]

24 minutes ago, Vilander said:

Ganguly Sachin and Sehwag were riddiculous in their second skill. Just a bunch of freak skilled cricketers who happened to play in same time.

At one point we had Irfan as well who could even open the innings. Kumble could bat. Agarkar could bat. Srinath could bat. Bhaji could bat. Secondary skill is zero for these guys other than Ash/Pandya/Jaddu. When Chahal hit a 4 they were laughing around and making a joke about it. This is international cricket. Mediocrity is not something we have to joke about.

Edited January 14, 2019 by vvvslaxman

[Nikola]

Yuvi too did good job against all sides except Australia.

 

[Rasgulla]

@beetle Put the PR team to work. This ll damage Bhuvi's pride!

[Gollum]

Ultimate beizzati 

How is this inept guy still a sure starter? Coming to the WC we have 5 guys who will start in a World XI (top 3, Kully, Bumrah) and 6 good for nothing freeloaders. How is such a * up going unnoticed by media? Saare bik gaye hai kya?  

[prasen82]

5 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

At one point we had Irfan as well who could even open the innings. Kumble could bat. Agarkar could bat. Srinath could bat. Bhaji could bat. Secondary skill is zero for these guys other than Ash/Pandya/Jaddu. When Chahal hit a 4 they were laughing around and making a joke about it. This is international cricket. Mediocrity is not something we have to joke about.

Valid. Chahal should not be allowed to bowl till he can bat and get to an average of 10. If Lyon can work on his batting why not chahal. He does not even play tests. Lazy bugger. 

[Vilander]

6 hours ago, Vilander said:

Ganguly Sachin and Sehwag were riddiculous in their second skill. Just a bunch of freak skilled cricketers who happened to play in same time.

 

6 hours ago, zen said:

And Dravid could keep wkts 

 

6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

At one point we had Irfan as well who could even open the innings. Kumble could bat. Agarkar could bat. Srinath could bat. Bhaji could bat. Secondary skill is zero for these guys other than Ash/Pandya/Jaddu. When Chahal hit a 4 they were laughing around and making a joke about it. This is international cricket. Mediocrity is not something we have to joke about.

Blame the Aussie great team still beat us in 2003. That was supposed to be the wc year. Go to hell ponting.

[jf1gp_1]

Ganguly was a part timer. Off the 100 wickets he took i bet a good 18-20 would have come in those toronto games.