Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Lannister said:

It's nonsense to see third-tier states like Bihar has more constituency seats than Karnataka. The fuq. 

I'm sure you realize there are many factors which come into play while deciding the number of constituencies in a state. According to 2011 census Bihar has 10+ cr. population (40 LS seats) as compared to Karnataka's 6.11 cr (28 LS seats), so why do think that it is disproportional representation ? Or Bimaru states don't exercise their voting rights as responsibly as other literate states?

Edited by Turning_track
Posted
5 minutes ago, DHONI_FANN said:

This is going to happen:

Today Rahul Gandhi gave his resignation to Rahul Gandhi which was rejected by Rahul Gandhi because Rahul Gandhi said resignation is no solution to problems created by Rahul Gandhi. :giggle:

:hatsoff:

Posted
1 hour ago, Yoda-esque said:

Amit Shah is really the Chanakya.BJP had no business winning seats in some areas but he's mastered the art of the impossible

Sent from my LM-Q710.FG using Tapatalk
 

 

not tamilnadu though :phehe:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Turning_track said:

I'm sure you realize there are many factors which come into play while deciding the number of constituencies in a state. According to 2011 census Bihar has 10+ cr. population (40 LS seats) as compared to Karnataka's 6.11 cr (28 LS seats), so why do think think that it is disproportional representation ? Or Bimaru states don't exercise their voting rights as responsibly as other literate states?

Population shouldn't be the sole factor. There's a reason Bihar is languishing at the bottom when it comes to development. It is the reflection of their people and the state of affairs over there. What's the point of this election when 70-80% of seats were alloted to Hindi belts. 

 

A state like Mizoram has only 2 seats alloted vs 80 seats for UP. This is a phucking joke. 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Lannister said:

Population shouldn't be the sole factor. There's a reason Bihar is languishing at the bottom when it comes to development. It is the reflection of their people and the state of affairs over there. What's the point of this election when 70-80% of seats were alloted to Hindi belts. 

 

A state like Mizoram has only 2 seats alloted vs 80 seats for UP. This is a phucking joke. 

People are the sole factor of a democratic process. 

Mizoram pop: 1 million. 

# of seat for Mizoram: 1
Mizoram pop/seat: 1 million/seat


UP pop: 200 million

# of seats for UP: 80

UP pop/seat: 2.5 million/seat

 

Mizoram is better represented in the LS than UP, FYI. 

 

Edited by Muloghonto
Posted
3 minutes ago, randomGuy said:

The thing is Bihar maybe less in development, yet voting for the better party than some so-called developed south states, still stuck in Aryan Dravidian theory and anti hindi bull s hit.

That doesn't make any sense. If they are voting for a better party, why are they still living in slums and thousands of Bihari students are migrating to Karnataka for better education.

Posted
1 minute ago, Lannister said:

That doesn't make any sense. If they are voting for a better party, why are they still living in slums and thousands of Bihari students are migrating to Karnataka for better education.

They are slowly coming out of that Stone Age,but mind you Bihar leads the chart in giving maximum number of IAS to the country,they are not absolutely slum dwellers as you have stated

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...