Thakur is alright.

[Global.Baba]

2 wickets, 1 runout. Had it been Hardik Pandya with a similar performance, lot of his fans would have been going gaga.

 

Good utility cricketer.

[ganeshran]

Bookmarked this for the bump later 

[R!TTER]

Babaji why are diverting traffic away from my thread 

I don't need to remind you but

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 hour ago, Global.Baba said:

2 wickets, 1 runout. Had it been Hardik Pandya with a similar performance, lot of his fans would have been going gaga.

 

Good utility cricketer.

yea coz hardik is 5th bowler and thakur is main bowler , thakur job ends right there so he has to do more 

[Ankit_sharma03]

thakur eco of 6.7 in ODI is ok 

pandya has 5.5 

[sandeep]

10 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

thakur eco of 6.7 in ODI is ok 

pandya has 5.5 

Pandya is gujju, and more importantly, moroniac has picked a personal fight with a few posters over Pandya's worth as a player.  That seals it.  

[zen]

FYI, Pandya also averages 55 in ODIs since 2016, when batting at 4-7 vs. top sides

 

See the thread “upper order vs middle order” for details 

Edited February 8, 2020 by zen

[Global.Baba]

2 hours ago, sandeep said:

Pandya is gujju, and more importantly, moroniac has picked a personal fight with a few posters over Pandya's worth as a player.  That seals it.  

What does that have to do with anything? Funnily enough we seem to be on the opposite side when it comes to cheering for 2 of the most powerful Gujjus in the world

 

 

[Global.Baba]

12 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

thakur eco of 6.7 in ODI is ok 

pandya has 5.5 

Why are you comparing them. Did I say Thakur is better than Pandya or should replace him?

 

The point I was making is- Thakur could have had 3 wickets yesterday including Taylor had Iyer not dropped the catch. Ended up with 2 critical wickets. Was responsible for another with brilliant fielding. 
 

Scored a few useless  quick runs.

 

If this was Pandya you would be pulling all law points and arguing how useful he is.

 

In fact Thakur has already won a couple of T20 man of the matches which Pandya hasn’t . In ODIs Thakur has won a tight game for us. Don’t recollect Pandya doing that.

 

Again I know Pandya has a lot more upside and is better than Thakur at this point. No brainer.

 

However the hypocrisy is funny, everything Pandya does is fine but Thakur just because we hate him as he fits a lot of criteria’s  he plays for Mumbai so the Anti-Mumbai Lobby crowd hate him, he plays for CSk so that comes with a lot of hate and overall he is a trundler so there is a lot of bias. I think he is more than useful utility cricketer who gets too much hate.

 

 

[Suhaan]

Baba has praised Thakur

[velu]

baba is high on neem leaves

[Ankit_sharma03]

23 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

 

If this was Pandya you would be pulling all law points and arguing how useful he is.

yes coz both do diff roles and expectation are diff

which is why when thakur scores 20 ppl say wow and pandya scores 20 ppl are like no enough.... so same rule 

 

As 5th bowler max expectation from pandya is to keep it tight and get a few wkts here n there. Similarly if thakur plays a cameo thats a bonus 

23 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

 

However the hypocrisy is funny, everything Pandya does is fine but Thakur just because we hate him as he fits a lot of criteria’s  

rich coming from u who called rohit 47 in Sa as some great innings and pandya 93 a fluke .

23 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

he plays for Mumbai so the Anti-Mumbai Lobby crowd hate him, he plays for CSk so that comes with a lot of hate and overall he is a trundler so there is a lot of bias. I think he is more than useful utility cricketer who gets too much hate.

 

 

he gets hate coz he is bang avg and he is value is good if he plays as utility player but he is being played as specialist 

[ShoonyaSifar]

Said in another thread if it was left to Kohli, he would play Jadeja, Ashwin, Bhuvi, Shardul Thakur and Deepak Chahar in all LOIs

[Ankit_sharma03]

31 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

 

In fact Thakur has already won a couple of T20 man of the matches which Pandya hasn’t .

 

However the hypocrisy is funny,

again rich coming from u who called krunal 3 MOM n 1 MOS fluke 

[sarcastic]

5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

yes coz both do diff roles and expectation are diff

which is why when thakur scores 20 ppl say wow and pandya scores 20 ppl are like no enough.... so same rule 

 

As 5th bowler max expectation from pandya is to keep it tight and get a few wkts here n there. Similarly if thakur plays a cameo thats a bonus 

rich coming from u who called rohit 47 in Sa as some great innings and pandya 93 a fluke .

he gets hate coz he is bang avg and he is value is good if he plays as utility player but he is being played as specialist 

Who said that? @maniac or @Global.Baba?
Don't confuse between them as they are two different posters.

[Global.Baba]

Was most useful player in match 2. Let’s see if he can repeat his heroics 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Baba Laga di nazar 

[ganeshran]

On 2/8/2020 at 4:44 AM, ganeshran said:

Bookmarked this for the bump later 

[FischerTal]

1 minute ago, ganeshran said:

I wish I could put the Haha and Sad reaction at the same time 

[The Dark Horse]

On 2/8/2020 at 10:14 AM, ganeshran said:

Bookmarked this for the bump later 

Baba