Jump to content

Can Hardik Pandya play as a batsman alone in ODIs if he cant bowl anymore?

Austin 3:!6

By Austin 3:!6
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted

SDP :cheer5:

 

  • most runs in the series
  • top scorer in 2 out of 3 games
  • 2 scores of 90 or more 
  • Avg of 105 
  • SR 115

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team India 
Opposition team Australia 
Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Nov 2020 
Qualifications runs scored greater than or equal to 50 
Ordered by batting average (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 7 of 7        
Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
HH Pandya 3 3 1 210 92* 105.00 183 114.75 0 2 0 15 6  
V Kohli 3 3 0 173 89 57.66 186 93.01 0 2 0 14 3  
RA Jadeja 3 3 1 115 66* 57.50 98 117.34 0 1 0 6 6  
S Dhawan 3 3 0 120 74 40.00 136 88.23 0 1 0 17 0  
KL Rahul 3 3 0 93 76 31.00 92 101.08 0 1 0 5 5  
MA Agarwal 2 2 0 50 28 25.00 44 113.63 0 0 0 6 1  
SS Iyer 3 3 0 59 38 19.66 59 100.00 0 0 0 7 0

 

 

Ankit_sharma03 Grand Master

Ankit_sharma03

Posted
Posted (edited)

Question

 

  1. Can he do more then few sixes?
  2. Can help team in collapse?
  3. Can he score more then 20s?
  4. Can he bat sensibly ?
  5. Does he deserve to bat up the order?
  6. Can he play fast bowling

 

 

Answer by pandya 

 

20200502_111313_compress55.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Straight Drive Newbie

Straight Drive

Posted
Posted

Hardik Pandya has batted well. In the two innings he has shown he can guide the team to a reasonable score by being the highest run scorer if the two innings at run a ball. 

 

It is good that he has scored 90 in two innings which are his two highest ODI scores. He isn't Rohit Sharma or Kohli or Dhawan who used to score hundreds and big ones but he definetely is one who can scire 90 on his good days at slightly better than run a ball.giid enough to bat at 6 and if he scores couple of 90's when the top order fails, he can be promoted at 5 while we search for his replacement at 6 gradually 

Ankit_sharma03 Grand Master

Ankit_sharma03

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

Hardik Pandya has batted well. In the two innings he has shown he can guide the team to a reasonable score by being the highest run scorer if the two innings at run a ball. 

 

It is good that he has scored 90 in two innings which are his two highest ODI scores. He isn't Rohit Sharma or Kohli or Dhawan who used to score hundreds and big ones but he definetely is one who can scire 90 on his good days at slightly better than run a ball.giid enough to bat at 6 and if he scores couple of 90's when the top order fails, he can be promoted at 5 while we search for his replacement at 6 gradually 

 

100 is just 10 more then 90, for which players waste 20-20 balls......the 100 syndrome needs to be gotten over with

impact is more important then individuals numbers.

 

Hardik twice had a chance but went for whats better for team and not breaking the momentum

Straight Drive Newbie

Straight Drive

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

100 is just 10 more then 90, for which players waste 20-20 balls......the 100 syndrome needs to be gotten over with

impact is more important then individuals numbers.

 

Hardik twice had a chance but went for whats better for team and not breaking the momentum

By 100 I meant the big hundreds which proper batsmen are expected to score.

 

Why is scoring more runs bad or a syndrome? What logic that a player having ability of scoring 90 should not look to get past 100 that is improve further.

Ankit_sharma03 Grand Master

Ankit_sharma03

Posted
Posted
Just now, Straight Drive said:

By 100 I meant the big hundreds which proper batsmen are expected to score.

 

Why is scoring more runs bad or a syndrome? What logic that a player having ability of scoring 90 should not look to get past 100 that is improve further.

U can score big 100 if u have time n partner 

At position which he bats max he ll get 15-20 overs that also if he bats at 6. At 7 Reduce more, even at 5 he ll get 20-25, difficult to get daddy 100....

Straight Drive Newbie

Straight Drive

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

U can score big 100 if u have time n partner 

At position which he bats max he ll get 15-20 overs that also if he bats at 6. At 7 Reduce more, even at 5 he ll get 20-25, difficult to get daddy 100....

That's what I said. Promote him gradually to number 5. Give him more opportunity to face more balls so that he scores more. 

sandeep Grand Master

sandeep

Posted
Posted
On 11/20/2020 at 6:05 AM, Majestic said:

We all know that the issue won't be resolved if we pick either of the two as specialist batsmen at no.6.

 

But, just a thought, why not Sanju Samson at 6? His striking ability is far better than Pandey and is a better batsmen than Pandya.

Samson is a top 3/4 type bat - not really suited for #6.  I am a fan of his batting, and keep hoping to see him take that next step.  But he hasn't done it yet.

zen Grand Master

zen

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Gollum said:

@zen 

Mohit Kumar: Interesting fact : Hardik (220 runs) has more runs than Smith (216 runs) in this series.

 
50% credit to SSS (Sir Sobers Shardooool) and SDP knows it
image.jpeg.7367b3e16b0db199e0b2be098b860407.jpeg
 


SDP has 210 runs .... do not know how many Smith has (216?)

SK_IH Newbie

SK_IH

Posted
Posted

Wonderful series for Pandya with bat. Good to see him displaying temparament of a batsman along with power hitting prowess. Massive advantage for India, when he starts giving 4-5 overs as well.

Only issue remaining is countering that wide angle used by fast bowlers against him. Today he again restricted in the last 3-4 overs by that line. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...