Jump to content

What separates these two teams?


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

Posted

They have choked twice on the final day. We have choked once on day 1. I think India got the worse of the batting conditions. No choke is justified especially getting bowled out for 78, but England have choked on easier batting conditions. So I think in the end our bowlers are more adept over a range of bowling conditions. 

Posted

No stokes (no ashwin)

No Archer ( 2 test man anyway)

 

Broad is decrepit now so doesn't count

Wood is a headless chicken

 

India don't have;

Gill

Sundar

Ashwin

Mayank

 

So india simply better. 

 

However last test is a lottery. Conditions will suit the team that bats first. 

Posted (edited)

I hear it is going to rain in the final test. So there will be clouds. If India runs into Anderson on a cloudy day  we could be in trouble again. Cloud can offset whatever the difference between the teams.

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted

@OP don't be fooled by the second innings effort of India, India is a highly mediocre batting team themselves. Both batting lineups are prone to collapses & it was England's turn this match.

But where India won this game was the choice of fast bowlers, India had a more versatile bowling lineup unlike English trundlers who just relied on swing & clouds 

Posted
5 hours ago, Jay said:

No stokes (no ashwin)

No Archer ( 2 test man anyway)

 

Broad is decrepit now so doesn't count

Wood is a headless chicken

 

India don't have;

Gill

Sundar

Ashwin

Mayank

 

So india simply better. 

 

However last test is a lottery. Conditions will suit the team that bats first. 

Archer averages 31 SR of 62. Overrated.

Posted
5 hours ago, Jay said:

No stokes (no ashwin)

No Archer ( 2 test man anyway)

 

Broad is decrepit now so doesn't count

Wood is a headless chicken

 

India don't have;

Gill

Sundar

Ashwin

Mayank

 

So india simply better. 

 

However last test is a lottery. Conditions will suit the team that bats first. 

Conditions will suit bowling first at Old Trafford.

Posted

Superior catching.

Slightly more balanced batting line-up.

Root’s bad captaincy.

Both teams have played loose shots but India have had slightly more application.

 

Really think England have thrown away this series:

 

- bowled in more favourable conditions.

- threw away the Lord’s test with awful bowling to tailenders.

- missed a chance to bat India out of the game here on day 2. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, daryl1985 said:

Superior catching.

Slightly more balanced batting line-up.

Root’s bad captaincy.

Both teams have played loose shots but India have had slightly more application.

 

Really think England have thrown away this series:

 

- bowled in more favourable conditions.

- threw away the Lord’s test with awful bowling to tailenders.

- missed a chance to bat India out of the game here on day 2. 

They dint 'throw **** away'. India caused the upset die to superior application.

Posted

We are blessed to have a group of individually driven players who want to answer their critics - Bumrah, Rahul, Umesh and to an extent Pujara. Some who have a grudge against their own TM  - Rohit, Pant, Shardul - all of them unwanted by the TM before/during Aus series, got an opportunity and haven't looked back.

 

Anyone who credits the clown for such fightback will be dishonest. He definitely played his part yesterday but like the team showed in Australia, they are capable of achieving and setting bigger and better benchmarks. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Samcric said:

And Woakes for the initial tests. 

India missing Gill, sundar, ashwin. 

Also thakur missed the game we lost. 

Umesh missed the game we lost. 

 

Lots of excuses ban sake hain.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Jay said:

India missing Gill, sundar, ashwin. 

Also thakur missed the game we lost. 

Umesh missed the game we lost. 

 

Lots of excuses ban sake hain.

 

Ashwin :facepalm:

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Jay said:

Ashwin in these conditions may have done better than mighty jadeja

 

 

I meant that the Ashwin problem is our own making - he is fit and available but the Team management does not select him. I don't think it can then be used as an excuse. Rest of the examples are that of injured players who are unavailable for selection.

 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, SK_IH said:

@OP don't be fooled by the second innings effort of India, India is a highly mediocre batting team themselves. Both batting lineups are prone to collapses & it was England's turn this match.

But where India won this game was the choice of fast bowlers, India had a more versatile bowling lineup unlike English trundlers who just relied on swing & clouds 

 

Yes  Aware of that. 36 all out 78 all out  India got all out under 200 , 9 times in the last 2 years alone. Most surprising aspect was Indian tail wagging. Suddenly going from the worst tail in the world to above average tail. England didn't have any weapon to knock of the tail. When they had, they indulged in short stuff and gave the match back to us on a platter.

 

DExwR4i.jpg

 

 

Edited by vvvslaxman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...