Rajvardhan hangargekar

[Ankit_sharma03]

 

• Strong base
• Power
• Great bat speed 
• his range is actually similar to hardik 

 

 

 

Edited March 10, 2022 by Ankit_sharma03

[maniac]

saw him U-19 and was sold on his talent. Exciting prospect

 

Ankit bhai the bowling quality in that video you posted  is very poor and doesn’t reflect this kid’s talent.

[Ankit_sharma03]

2 minutes ago, maniac said:

saw him U-19 and was sold on his talent. Exciting prospect

 

Ankit bhai the bowling quality in that video you posted  is very poor and doesn’t reflect this kid’s talent.

Base , bat speed to same hi hota hai. Baaki against high quality bowler kaisa hai wo to check hona hi hai ek din 

 

I saw such videos of srk, dube, iyer long back but was never convinced . 

[Lord]

still will say Umesh like

 

which is not bad for his age at all.CSK is best place for him

[Lone Wolf]

Dinesh Bana man that Kid was super....  I am still wrapping my head around that dude was not in draft.  Maybe FC matches were criteria.  Bana was only 17..  Clean striker that boy

[Lord]

1 minute ago, Lone Wolf said:

Dinesh Bana man that Kid was super....  I am still wrapping my head around that dude was not in draft.  Maybe FC matches were criteria.  Bana was only 17..  Clean striker that boy

19 age minimum

[Lone Wolf]

27 minutes ago, Lord said:

19 age minimum

Stupid rule...  That Afghani Noor Ahmad is 19?.  I thought he maybe a 16 yo youngsta beauty

[Lord]

6 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Stupid rule...  That Afghani Noor Ahmad is 19?.  I thought he maybe a 16 yo youngsta beauty

the rule is for Indians who havent played domestic cricket

 

https://crickettimes.com/2022/02/8-india-u-19-players-ineligible-to-feature-in-ipl-2022-auction/

[maniac]

8 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Stupid rule...  That Afghani Noor Ahmad is 19?.  I thought he maybe a 16 yo youngsta beauty

You can’t apply age group for Afghan cricketer. I am sure there is a muscular and bearded 5 year old Afghan player training for next u-19 wc as we speak.

[Pollack]

His technique can be described as "A tailender who can tonk the ball."

 

[Sean Bradley]

Almost every ball is an half volley in the video, but the dude has got the swag of a young Dhoni. Let see what he turns into.

Edited February 15, 2022 by Sean Bradley

[SRT100]

11 hours ago, Lord said:

19 age minimum

 

Stupid rule.

 

In Australia it would be a breach of our Trade Practices Act. Its why kids in Australia from the age of 17+ can nominate for the draft in (AFL or Rugby) and play when they turn 18. Its also why they can if good enough play in the Big Bash. A lot of kids in Australia are not only good at cricket, but usually other sports as well depending on which state they are from usually.

 

Whoever set the rule, needs to appreciate that these kids could potentially be lost to other sports or other interests. Its rather foolish, not to mention for some kids of a poor background a massive loss of earning potential.

 

Its actually madness to have this rule in India.

[nevada]

15 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Stupid rule...  That Afghani Noor Ahmad is 19?.  I thought he maybe a 16 yo youngsta beauty

Wasn't Rashid Khan 17 and playing in the IPL? 

[nevada]

14 hours ago, Pollack said:

His technique can be described as "A tailender who can tonk the ball."

 

That's what I felt while watching him bat in the U19 WC. I felt Bana deserved to bat ahead of him in the slog overs. 

[Lone Wolf]

47 minutes ago, nevada said:

Wasn't Rashid Khan 17 and playing in the IPL? 

Yeah Abhishek Sharma as well.  Sundar too.  I think they had a FC game under their belt at the time. 

Most of these U19 kids don't have any.  Dhull Hanga are 19 so that's what got them picked. 

 

[rkt.india]

2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Yeah Abhishek Sharma as well.  Sundar too.  I think they had a FC game under their belt at the time. 

Most of these U19 kids don't have any.  Dhull Hanga are 19 so that's what got them picked. 

 

Hangar has played for Maharashtra.

[vvvslaxman]

There was this guy Atul Bedade who was exclusively picked for effortless striking power.  Hit like 3 or 4 sixes against Pakistan in a ODI game.

[Vijy]

6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

There was this guy Atul Bedade who was exclusively picked for effortless striking power.  Hit like 3 or 4 sixes against Pakistan in a ODI game.

he had a good SR of 86 for that era. not so adept at strike rotation, otherwise it could have been even higher. Kapil had a SR of near-100 in one of the decades (maybe 80s).

[vvvslaxman]

3 hours ago, Vijy said:

he had a good SR of 86 for that era. not so adept at strike rotation, otherwise it could have been even higher. Kapil had a SR of near-100 in one of the decades (maybe 80s).

 

India desperately needed a finisher back then. Azharuddin was more a strike rotator. Apart from Tendulkar only Bedade/Robin singh had somewhat decent strike during the mid 90s.  VIkram Rathour's (our current batting coach) had a strike rate of 58. That was low even in that era.

[Vk1]

On 2/15/2022 at 8:20 PM, vvvslaxman said:

 

India desperately needed a finisher back then. Azharuddin was more a strike rotator. Apart from Tendulkar only Bedade/Robin singh had somewhat decent strike during the mid 90s.  VIkram Rathour's (our current batting coach) had a strike rate of 58. That was low even in that era.

I remember a odi game in south africa.. this Vikram Rathore was leaving balls like it was a test match.. those were really horrible days