Jump to content

BCCI Fires the Selectors… Breaking News!


asterix

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, SecondSlip said:

1. Jay Shah needs to get sacked 
2. Rohit the T20 cricketer needs to retire 
3. Sack the whole coaching staff and hire foreigners like Mike Hesson, Jonty Rhodes etc. 

Jay Shah is general secretary. He has no role in any selection. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Lol some other lallus will apply for it....  Why can't BCCI hires someone straight up? 

Irfan,  Parthiv,  Zaheer or even likes of Srinath. 

why would those guys bother risking their media careers over the  thankless job of selection.

 

There's a reason why BCCI 'administrative' and selection positions only attracts the 2nd tier players as "candidates".  Its always the likes of MSK Prasad, and other never-weres who line up for the job.  

 

The problem with India's sub-optimal T20 results over the last decade has been a refusal of the BCCI as an organization to take the format seriously and evaluate players for selection strictly based on the demands of the format.  They continued to use t20 international selection spots as 'rewards' for so-called consistent players like Rahane even when everybody could see that he's a misfit in the format.  Even as late as 2021, 2022, the emphasis was never on hitting capabilities of the top order but orange caps and 'consistent' big runs.   Results are of course predictable.  

 

I have said it time and again, India is going to be the first host loser of the ODI world cup since 2007 and its all due to abject mismanagement of player resources, flawed selection policies that cater to preserving the primacy of "senior players" over the team's interests.  

 

25 minutes ago, maniac said:

It’s not whom they fire it’s about whom they hire.

 

This ultimately is still a problem.  And to a certain degree its not even the next selectors - its the entrenched organizational mindset of "stability", and inertia.  Which is present in the team leadership - captain coaches etc.  They all know where their interests are, and their incentives are constructed to line up with that - not the team's.  

Posted
30 minutes ago, maniac said:

Also press trust of India and Imran Khans party have the same initials :wall:

Both Lie and Uturns. what's the difference?

Posted

I wasn't a big fan of Dhoni, particularly in Tests but at his peak he was a tactically astute captain who knew exactly what team he wanted and was willing to fight for it. Instead we get have beens like Rohit stuck in the 2000s with no tactical plans to turn around the game 

Posted
6 minutes ago, maniac said:

He can override pretty much every decision related to Indian cricket including selections if he wishes to.

He can't. Only president can. His job is to convene meetings. Nothing else. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, LordPrabhzy said:

Ghanta kuch badlega- next of selectors will also be yes men to the Captain and powerful media lobbyists

The issue with Indian selection committee is more in structural. doesn't matter who is there, they will making same mistakes.

 

For some reason, I like Ramiz Raja's approach. he is sending notices to all formal pakistani cricketers like alpha male. Ramiz raja is teaching a lesson to all " Batamiz Raja" or pakistani cricket. he got some guts to do it.

 

BCCI should get some balls and make some hard decisions like make foreign coaches, kick fat guys out of LOI, put some new blood in team.

Posted
Just now, rkt.india said:

He can't. Only president can. His job is to convene meetings. Nothing else. 

 

Are you reading from BCCI’s “official” rule book?

 

He is there to run the business and give the exact same excuse if things don’t work out. You realize why he got the job right?

 

Posted

A welcome decision but I feel this is more a move to appease the fanbase who are baying for the BCCIs blood post the semis thrashing. 

 

All this new era talk is moot if you don't sack the management that was responsible for the debacle in the first place. 

Posted
1 minute ago, jalebi_bhai said:

dc-Cover-6srhg9tor9vkst7jamubc8qrg3-2019

 

So then what is he doing in selection meetings? He was also the one who officially announced the 2021 t20 wc squad.

Secretary is always present in the selection meeting and usually secretary announces the squad. Secretary is the convener. Jay Shah isn't the first secretary to be in selection meeting. He has no say in selection. President should not be in selection meeting but Ganguly broke the protocol while secretary being there is the protocol to oversaw the meeting and make sure everything goes well because secretary has no veto power in selection. Only selectors and captain. Even coach can only give opinion, not selection voting power.

Posted
Just now, jalebi_bhai said:

A welcome decision but I feel this is more a move to appease the fanbase who are baying for the BCCIs blood post the semis thrashing. 

 

All this new era talk is moot if you don't sack the management that was responsible for the debacle in the first place. 


They will replace the old faces with young and glamorous faces probably even appoint Thala in some role as well and continue business as usual.

Posted
3 minutes ago, maniac said:

 

Are you reading from BCCI’s “official” rule book?

 

He is there to run the business and give the exact same excuse if things don’t work out. You realize why he got the job right?

 

Yes, he is there to run the business, not select players or coaches or even selectors. He is an administrator. BCCI create advisory cotton select coaches or selectors. Administrators don't select any coach.

Posted
3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Secretary is always present in the selection meeting and usually secretary announces the squad. Secretary is the convener. Jay Shah isn't the first secretary to be in selection meeting. He has no say in selection. President should not be in selection meeting but Ganguly broke the protocol while secretary being there is the protocol to oversaw the meeting and make sure everything goes well because secretary has no veto power in selection. Only selectors and captain. Even coach can only give opinion, not selection voting power.

 

How do you know that he doesn't influence decisions? On paper, he might just be the convener but reality might be rather different. 

 

It's not like they publicly disclose the minutes of the meeting. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...