Jump to content

High drama as Bairstow given out after Carey throw


Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

An Ashes controversy kicked up on the final day of the second Test after Jonny Bairstow was given out in bizarre circumstances, prompting an exchange of words between the two side's captains and boos ringing out around the normally genteel Lord's.

Bairstow, on 10 and shaping as a crucial figure in England’s fourth-innings pursuit of 371, ducked under a harmless bouncer from Cameron Green. Wicketkeeper Alex Carey immediately underarmed the ball at the stumps as the batter inadvertently wandered out of his crease.

 

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/jonny-bairstow-run-out-alex-carey-lords-day-five-ashes-australia-england-cummins-stokes/2023-07-02

Posted (edited)

Starc, Cummins were very vocal after Ashwin's mankad dismissal in a random IPL game. There were threads opened on the IPL forum where some of our brown coolies threw their weight behind the goras and argued how they have a superior sports culture, hence play fair. Where are those buddhijeevis now?

Edited by Gollum
Posted (edited)

That's cheap act from Aussies but as Ellyse Perry said long back about Mankad that if you have to do anything against the spirit, do it vs English. So, Aussies doing this to English is completely fine for me as well. :cheer:

Edited by Majestic
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Starc, Cummins were very vocal after Ashwin's mankad dismissal in a random IPL game. There were threads opened on the IPL forum where some of our brown coolies threw their weight behind the goras and argued how they have a superior sports culture, hence play fair. Where are those buddijeevis now?

Maybe they thought about it some and came to see the light (;

Posted
14 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Spirit of cricket is a nonsense concept applicable only when one of the gora sides is on the receiving end against SC side or WI. In all other cases rules are rules. The earlier Indians shed their inferiority complex the better.

If the rule is "unfair," then petition the ICC to change it. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Starc, Cummins were very vocal after Ashwin's mankad dismissal in a random IPL game. There were threads opened on the IPL forum where some of our brown coolies threw their weight behind the goras and argued how they have a superior sports culture, hence play fair. Where are those buddhijeevis now?

This dismissal had nothing to do with spirit of cricket because Carey threw the ball immediately after he received it and Baitstaw was still in the crease so ball was in play. But when the ball was midway, Baitstaw left his crease as it hit the stumps. So got out stumped.

Posted (edited)

England are repeat offenders in similar situations and they always cry for spirit of the game to save them.. It works when the opposition is India (Ian Bell incident) or NZ (Paul Collingwood incident). It doesn't work against Australia.

 

Here is the Collingwood incident.. almost a replica of the Bairstow wicket. But Collingwood was allowed to continue to bat despite the third umpire giving him out..

 

Same thing happened with Ian Bell. He was given out, but England begged Dhoni to withdraw his appeal and he did.

 

 

Edited by bowl_out
Posted
54 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

This dismissal had nothing to do with spirit of cricket because Carey threw the ball immediately after he received it and Baitstaw was still in the crease so ball was in play. But when the ball was midway, Baitstaw left his crease as it hit the stumps. So got out stumped.

No he was not out stumped, he was out run out.

 

It has got everything to do with spirit of the game.

Posted
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Spirit of cricket is a nonsense concept applicable only when one of the gora sides is on the receiving end against SC side or WI. In all other cases rules are rules. The earlier Indians shed their inferiority complex the better.

And the goras happily claim suspicious catches too. Why can't they signal like gentlemen that they aren't sure if the catch is clean? 

Posted
23 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

England are repeat offenders in similar situations and they always cry for spirit of the game to save them.. It works when the opposition is India (Ian Bell incident) or NZ (Paul Collingwood incident). It doesn't work against Australia.

 

Here is the Collingwood incident.. almost a replica of the Bairstow wicket. But Collingwood was allowed to continue to bat despite the third umpire giving him out..

 

Same thing happened with Ian Bell. He was given out, but England begged Dhoni to withdraw his appeal and he did.

 

 

 

They also didn't call back Elliot after he banged into the bowler midway. Serves them right

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Starc, Cummins were very vocal after Ashwin's mankad dismissal in a random IPL game. There were threads opened on the IPL forum where some of our brown coolies threw their weight behind the goras and argued how they have a superior sports culture, hence play fair. Where are those buddhijeevis now?

They would argue that mankad is a dismissal even before the ball is delivered whereas this is a dismissal after the ball is played by the batter. Hence they would treat this legit.

 

Posted

The ball is in play as soon as the bowler takes his runup, well technically from the point when he enters his bowling action so there's that.

Posted
Just now, Lord said:

 

They also didn't call back Elliot after he banged into the bowler midway. Serves them right

 

 

Both England and Australia talk about spirit of the game only when they are at receiving end.

 

When they are the offenders they will quote rule book.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...