Jump to content

There is no one matching Hardik Pandya’s abilities in India: MSK Prasad


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Adi BB said:

His batting was missed today and even in the vizag one day .

If pandya bats like he did against Aus last year ,our problem for #6 and a lower order hitter will be finished 

His avg against good bowling sides where Ind is likely to lose early wkts

 

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 2016-2018 42 27 4 670 83 29.13 585 114.52 0 4 2 42 31 Profile
filtered 2017-2018 21 15 4 501 83 45.54 420 119.28 0 4 1 30 26

 

 

PS vs Aus and Eng

 

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 2016-2018 42 27 4 670 83 29.13 585 114.52 0 4 2 42 31 Profile
filtered 2017-2018 11 9 2 379 83 54.14 336 112.79 0 3 0 25 16  
Career summary
GroupingAscending Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
v Australia 2017-2017 5 4 0 222 83 55.50 204 108.82 0 2 0 13 12 view innings
v England 2017-2018 6 5 2 157 56 52.33 132 118.93 0 1 0 12 4
Edited by zen
Link to comment

Hardik atm is a far more useful cricketer in ODIs than in tests..some of us might be mixing up his performances across formats.. end of the day any captain would want him in his side. Infact purely by the all-round weight that he brings.. his name should be second/third after Kohli along with bumrah..on the team sheet... 

Edited by Vk1
Link to comment
56 minutes ago, Vk1 said:

Hardik atm is a far more useful cricketer in ODIs than in tests..some of us might be mixing up his performances across formats.. end of the day any captain would want him in his side. Infact purely by the all-round weight that he brings.. his name should be second/third after Kohli along with bumrah..on the team sheet... 

valid point. only krunal comes close to hardik in terms of all round capability in ODIs. when we fans can see the difference across formats donno why the selectors cant see it and dhoni extending his stay is killing it. 

 

dhoni please retire and can we have

 

shikhar,rohit,kohli,rahul,jadhav,pant,pandya,sundar,kuldeep,khaleel,bumrah in the team.

 

backups: rayudu, DK, krunal and BK.

 

 

this should be our WC 15 squad.

 

would prefer DK to go as primary keeper as i never feel confident with pant to steer a chase.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

has he failed at international level yet???

he looks a bloody solid batsman, bowling is ok ok.....but his job is jst give rest thats it

 

Binny didnt do bad job

he helped us draw a test in eng, did a good job in SL 2015 to 

Shankar is the embodiment of mediocrity.Trundler and tailender type batsman.

Binny is also a big trundler and has regressed in batting massively .

Link to comment
37 minutes ago, Tendulkar1996 said:

Shankar is the embodiment of mediocrity.Trundler and tailender type batsman.

Binny is also a big trundler and has regressed in batting massively .

his avg is 48 in FC and more so if u look at his batting he looks solid then many domestic batsman

Trundler hai to kya, his job is not to tear away opposition

 

Hardik pandya bowls around 140k, people have problem with him to 

 

We talk as if our domestic cricket is filled with kallis, flintoff, imran, kapil

 

We have to do in whatever we have 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Khota said:

Conversation went downhill because of this:

 

"I understand that you live in a cave. FYI, he has a 100 and bowls at 140+ "

Let's not make caveman like comments where despite a player scoring a 100 and bowling at 140+, you want to "act" as if he does not do that :lol: 

 

Anyways, enjoy:

 

12484779.jpg

Link to comment

MSK keeps proving everyday why he doesn’t belong in the selectors chair. The guy is a clown.

The first thing is, being a selector, you can’t make such careless and umbrella statements, that too clearly favouring one player over others. He needs to be taught what kind of statements he can make.

 

Pandya at best is a T20 player, nothing beyond that. If the selectors are happy with one performance once every 10 matches, I wonder where the standard of indian cricket has fallen down to. 

Link to comment

Pandya adds tremendous value as a No.7 ODI batsman. .. with a very high SR and decent average and ability to hit big shots.  But his ODI bowling is mediocre.

 

We must try to find substitutes who have to be big hitters at No.7  and mediocre bowlers ...  to be Pandya backups.

 

Pacer all-rounders --

 

Vijay Shankar 

Shivam Dubey

Darshan Nalkande

 

Spinner-allrounders --

 

Krunal Pandya

K. Gowtham

 

 

No.7 has to be a big hitter first and a bowler later  ...  as he will be the 5th bowler.

 

Jadeja does not fit this role.

 

Saying that we don't have anyone ...  that is giving up too easily.

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment

Guys like Pandya n Shankar are an asset, Pandya has skills ,is a natural, with the ball n bat n is a athlete.Def someone to look after and nurture.

Shankar is a proper batsmen, good technique and has added a gear or two in his batting.Bowling he can bowl and get a way or two, he is tall gets decent bounce and can move the ball.He bowls 128 to 135 k range and is worth giving him a chance and nurturing him.

Selectors are pussies with no plans, foresight and no voice or intelligence, all they have done is play musical chairs, why have the Sundars, Sainis, Shankar's, Agarwals, Gills, Sarfaraz , Siraj not in the side but we see, retards and loosers like Kunt, Kaul, Dhoni, DK and Dhawan, Rohit, in wrong formats even if they can play in one format

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Pandya adds tremendous value as a No.7 ODI batsman. .. with a very high SR and decent average and ability to hit big shots.  But his ODI bowling is mediocre.

 

We must try to find substitutes who have to be big hitters at No.7  and mediocre bowlers ...  to be Pandya backups.

 

Pacer all-rounders --

 

Vijay Shankar 

Shivam Dubey

Darshan Nalkande

 

Spinner-allrounders --

 

Krunal Pandya

K. Gowtham

 

 

No.7 has to be a big hitter first and a bowler later  ...  as he will be the 5th bowler.

 

Jadeja does not fit this role.

 

Saying that we don't have anyone ...  that is giving up too easily.

 

 

Hardik Pandya should be 6th bowler in ODI, batting in top 6.  he can easily be a #6 bat in ODIs like Stokes does for England.  

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...