Jump to content

Will virat kohli inning prove costly for india?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

After great start from opners against Australia opening bowlers

Virat kohli came to bat at 127-1

Australia 4th and 5th bowlers were bowling, no pressure,flat pitch ,short boundries

needed 100 runs from him  from 77 balls

but alas,he did not  scored at required pace.

he was on 59 runs off 65 balls at one stage

played selfishly for his runs not for team cause.

 

Edited by sergio04
want to add
Posted
Just now, Pollack said:

Kohli struggled for no reason. And yet his innings was far better than Rohit Sharma. So king Kohli even on his bad day mangaes to put up a decent innings. :hatsoff:

 

lol If Rohit batted in last 10 overs, he himself would have scored 80 runs

Posted
Just now, Gollum said:

Don't think so, thankfully Pandya, Dhoni and KLR compensated for the deficit. But that was a ghatiya knock by our skipper, needs to improve fast. 

needs to call spade a spade

but his fanboys will get trigger

Posted
2 minutes ago, sergio04 said:

needs to call spade a spade

but his fanboys will get trigger

Fanboys will never change, in their deluded minds Kohli is already greater than Viv. If that is the level of delusion we can do nothing about it. 

Posted
Just now, Gollum said:

Fanboys will never change, in their deluded minds Kohli is already greater than Viv. If that is the level of delusion we can do nothing about it. 

he is yet to play dominating inning in wc 

he is playing his 3rd wc , at his peak

today was perfect day for him for scoring impactful fast hundred.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

If u loose from here its bowlers 

Even srilanka batting got 320 easily against India

if we win from here , it will be because of our bowlers

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, sergio04 said:

Even srilanka batting got 320 easily against India

if we win from here , it will be because of our bowlers

it was bowlers then, we had ashwin n jadeja which is why we moved on to wkt taking bowlers like Kulcha for middle overs

Win is on batsman they have given a winning total ......

Also 352 and 320 a huge a diff

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

it was bowlers then, we had ashwin n jadeja which is why we moved on to wkt taking bowlers like Kulcha for middle overs

Win is on batsman they have given a winning total ......

Also 352 and 320 a huge a diff

Ashwin didn't play the match against Lanka in CT 2017, which was a blunder IMO. He is generally good against them and they had many LHBs that day. 

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

it was bowlers then, we had ashwin n jadeja which is why we moved on to wkt taking bowlers like Kulcha for middle overs

Win is on batsman they have given a winning total ......

Lets see.

we scored 66 runs during 30-40 overs

even when 1 wicket was down

We could have got 15 runs extra in 30 -40 overs if virat played with intent.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Ashwin didn't play the match against Lanka in CT 2017, which was a blunder IMO. He is generally good against them and they had many LHBs that day. 

ohh yea just checked .....

Posted (edited)

Real question is whether Smith and Warner's tuk-tuking cost Ozzies the game. Smith is for me the best Test batsman by a distance, but as an ODI bat he is not even in the top 10 of the world these days. VK, Ross Taylor, Root, Babar, Butler, Rohit, Roy, Dhawan, Williamson, etc. are all better than him. Heck, Warner and arguably Khawaja are better. However, the danger with Smith is that he's a bona fide big match player which VK is not in the WCs.

Edited by Vijy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...