Jump to content

First time I agree with Rahul Gandhi about China taking over weak Indian companies..

veer

By veer
in Chit Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

coffee_rules Grand Master

coffee_rules

Posted
Posted
On 4/17/2020 at 1:00 AM, Gollum said:

My thoughts about RaGa are well known here. But he isn't a coward like Modi....6 years as PM, not a single open PC with active participation of journos from hostile media networks. We all know what happened in that Karan Thapar episode, RaGa took a beating from Arnab but he was brave enough to go there in the first place. 

Yes, when he can take questions and give incoherent answers with no one analyzing what he said, is a PC one can be proud of.

You can imagine questions to Modi in a PC. Are you sorry about 2002? Will you apologize?

rising Apprentice

rising

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Audiophile said:

Can someone tell why the supply chain of the whole world is in China and not a country like India. I do not labor rates are that much of a disparity. Is it because the Chinese system is more efficient because of their dictatorial regime?

here are several reasons like being right place at right time and when companies where looking to move from their  manufacturing  country many countries had  stricter laws or in case India restriction in Foreign investment before 1991 

China had Cheap skilled labor which many countries had but China not much of health, Safety.  Employment and environmental regulation which is why companies the moved China when US and Europe started imposing it 

For example a medical company wanted test medical for vaccine's on animal which country would it move? Let see China allows trade of wild animals and kill the  so they will work cheaper compliance norms  so let move there

diga Grand Master

diga

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Yes, when he can take questions and give incoherent answers with no one analyzing what he said, is a PC one can be proud of.

Kis gadhe ko pakad kar Congress ke kursi mein Bitaya?

someone Rising Star

someone

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Yes, when he can take questions and give incoherent answers with no one analyzing what he said, is a PC one can be proud of.

That's what happens when one never worked entire life, and been Spoon-Fed instead. He has no insights, zero achievements, no success stories, zero personal examples. Thus, he can talk generic and repetition of certain "buzz words".

 

It's an embarrassment that a 50 year old, has nothing to talk about on his own. Yet, he has "bhakts" who wet themselves whenever he speaks. Bhakts, is really applicable for a dynasty like Rahul than a self-made man like Modi.

 

Social media biggest victim in India is Rahul Gandhi. In 2010, he was the most popular next PM candidate, yet social media completely exposed him and his fake invincibility and well-scholar image.

retired_hurt Newbie

retired_hurt

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Yes, when he can take questions and give incoherent answers with no one analyzing what he said, is a PC one can be proud of.

You can imagine questions to Modi in a PC. Are you sorry about 2002? Will you apologize?

And Modi will find a way to blame Nehru for 2002 riots.

Autonomous Experienced

Autonomous

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Yes, when he can take questions and give incoherent answers with no one analyzing what he said, is a PC one can be proud of.

You can imagine questions to Modi in a PC. Are you sorry about 2002? Will you apologize?

Wtf? Is he high? 

veer Newbie

veer

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Bhakts is no curse word.. if you are nationalist and want country to progress then they call you 'Bhakts'.. 

 

F'ing i dont take that as curse word.. 

Edited by veer
velu Grand Master

velu

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

 

 

i am against our action against chinese investment here .. 

if we are going to get benefits out of china , we shld wholeheartedly welcome them .. we are not in a position to deny foreign money 

Jimmy Cliff Newbie

Jimmy Cliff

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, velu said:

 

i am against our action against chinese investment here .. 

if we are going to get benefits out of china , we shld wholeheartedly welcome them .. we are not in a position to deny foreign money 

How would you strike a balance between allowing investments but at the same time preventing "strategic" take-overs of critical companies? 

velu Grand Master

velu

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

How would you strike a balance between allowing investments but at the same time preventing "strategic" take-overs of critical companies? 

 

in many sectors there are limits about how much FIIs can invest and it varies between the sectors ..

when comes to listed companies SEBI can interfere and protect our companies or shareholders if needed ..

 

we need to bother about how to get the money inside , we can always make sure that money cannot be taken out easily :p: 

veer Newbie

veer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Yes. You maybe on to something here. Look at @Jimmy Cliff's DP also.

 

But if he is Chinese would he be a Troll or a Tloll?

Aur yeh bahot he shaandaar shot.. Mariyam dhwara.. balle ko ghumma diya tha bahari gend par

veer Newbie

veer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Pagla gaya hai kya chutiye?

kitne khaaye he... woh bataiye.. yeh ch**pa apne pas rakhiye.. 

Jimmy Cliff Newbie

Jimmy Cliff

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, veer said:

kitne khaaye he... woh bataiye.. yeh ch**pa apne pas rakhiye.. 

Pehle aap bataiye ke Rahul Gandhi ki chaatne ke liye kitne khaaye hai Kangress se. Waise apne chutiyape ka pradarshan toh kar hi chuke hain. Yeh bhi bataa dijiye ke janmjaat chutiye hain yaan mehnat ka assar hai.

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...