Jump to content

How come Surya kumar Yadav has never been selected for Intl squads?


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Iyer is okay and sky isn't competing for Sharma's place. Pandey is the one he should replace. 

If Yadav is going to bat at #6, he might as well just play for Mumbai Indians. 

Posted (edited)

My t20 XI

 

Rohit(c)

KL/Dhawan

SKY

Samson(keeper)

Pandey

SDP

Washington

Saini/krunal/tewatia(depending on condition)

Chahal

Shami

Boom boom

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by urbestfriend
Posted
2 hours ago, Lannister said:

I am talking about Sharma and Iyer. Pandey mostly comes out to bat at #6 in T20s. It's the Iyer who is keeping Yadav out from #4 position. Yadav could also play as an opener in place of Sharma. 

 

Ahh My goodness. The multiple meanings here.  Story of India :laugh:

Posted
11 minutes ago, urbestfriend said:

My t20 XI

 

Rohit(c)

KL/Dhawan

SKY

Samson(keeper)

Pandey

SDP

Washington

Saini/krunal/tewatia(depending on condition)

Chahal

Shami

Boom boom

 

 

 

 

 

 

why is KL under doubt that to for dhawan 

Samson isnt good beyond 3 most days

Pandey is at his best in t20 if he bats at 3 

Krunal n tewatia cant play as main bowlers 

Posted
3 hours ago, Lannister said:

If Yadav is going to bat at #6, he might as well just play for Mumbai Indians. 

Sky is someone who can bat anywhere,   did successfully for KKR for years.  He is our 360 player.

Posted

Why are all threads archived and not being able to post replies??

 

I was searching for gollums thread on indian batsmen should adopt sweep and reverse sweep thread only to find it locked and archived.

 

Yesterday's game had one too many beautiful sweeps from SKY and it deserves to be posted in that thread. While Chahal dominated other batsmen and took 2 wickets sky hit him for a six and 2 4s with his sweep shots.

https://www.hotstar.com/in/sports/cricket/indian-premier-league/mumbai-indians-vs-royal-challengers-bangalore-m701698/match-clips/hotstar-of-the-match-suryakumar/1260046483

Posted

Indian T20 squad should be:-

 

Openers- Rohit, Rahul

 

Backups- Agarwal, Dhawan, Shaw

 

No.3- Virat Kohli

 

No.4- Shreyas Iyer

 

Backups- Manish Pandey, SKY

 

No.5- Sanju Samson/Rishabh Pant

 

No.6- Hardik Pandya

 

No.7- Jadeja/Sundar/Krunal

 

No.8- Bhuvi

 

No.9- Shami/Saini

 

Backup- Deepak Chahar

 

No.10- Yuzi Chahal

 

Backup- V.C, R.B

 

No.11- Bumrah

Posted
7 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Sky is someone who can bat anywhere,   did successfully for KKR for years.  He is our 360 player.

What is his strike rate when batting at #6? 

Posted (edited)

Indian selectors generally have this knack of not been able to differentiate ODIs with T20s.

 

Shreyas Iyer did wonders to Indian ODI team by solving no.4 position but he is probably inferior to SKY in T20s  for that position who can bat at much higher S/R. Precisely, SKY should bat at 4 and Iyer and Pandey as backup in T20 but they prefer to follow the ODI rule.

 

Jadeja is very good for ODIs but shouldn't be playing in T20s because his bowling is poor. They should try Sundar or Axar but Jaddu generally gets an edge due to his fielding.

 

Dhawan is excellent in ODIs but his T20 track record is so poor yet he gets chances. He certainly shouldn't be prioritised over Rahul anymore.

 

 

Edited by Majestic
Posted
2 minutes ago, express bowling said:

The way SKY has pulled 2 quick short balls by Nortje for 4 on a greenish pitch today ...

 

Needs to be in Team India in LOIs.

 

and these shots that he played to someone of the pace of archer, he has to be in t20s

 

EjqE6BxU8AMYO5u?format=jpg&name=medium

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...