Jump to content

Afghanistan Turmoil


ravishingravi

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Alexa play Lovede lag gaye for Pakistan

For Taliban, the importance of Pakistan is over. Now China is only one who can make them talk to Pakistan. But I feel, they are trying their best to please West and not China

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing our own people celebrating for these terrorists, should be a wake-up call for anybody sane. We have many sympathizers around the country, and Kashmir is just one part.

 

And liberals can't be liberals if it refuses to even call out the religious terrorism.

Edited by someone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 hours ago, Vilander said:

300k afgan troops surrendered why? Its not that black and white

 

No its not black and white but main reason lack of control by government military was still US command and  sudden changes they were not ready most of them were not well trained

Lack motivation and many viewed it as US controlled government so lack of belonging and the government didn't  reach out to people which Taliban did by helping poor farmers (Providing Money for heroin)

US released Taliban members one of them is main person was involved negotiation between the  Taliban and US in Feb 2020 and they release some 5000 Taliban and had agreed to remove sanction against Taliban, so question why would US negotiate with terrorist when there government Afghan government  . how will Afgan army feel about this. Below is article from Feb 2020 BBC which is pro government  (US and UK) 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51689443

 

What I want conclude is everyone knew Afghan government wouldn't not withhold without US support .Us probably was hoping Afghan would hold for couple of months  but they proved to clever 

 

32 minutes ago, someone said:

Seeing our own people celebrating for these terrorists, should be a wake-up call for anybody sane. We have many sympathizers around the country, and Kashmir is just one part.

 

And liberals can't be liberals if it refuses to even call out the religious terrorism.

 

There are some people are so adamant to prove that their point they don't care what harm they are doing to nation or anybody just win argument thats biggest problem 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rising said:

sudden changes they were not ready most of them were not well trained

Lack motivation and many viewed it as US controlled government so lack of belonging

Not sudden change, but lack of motivation yes and so Taliban is an Afgan option while US and democracy is alien. So in many ways for Afghanistan the Taliban is a home grown system, their country their system, how difficult is it to understand and respect. I don't get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Vilander said:

May be they should consider immigration to Afghanistan then Taliban is good for them. 

 

They are staying back so that they can liberate people like Coffee, you and I. At the same time, they want to save people from Pak, Afg and BD by bringing them here, make them healthy enough so that they could demand shariya in this infidel land one day.

 

This is all so adorable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Vilander said:

Not sudden change, but lack of motivation yes and so Taliban is an Afgan option while US and democracy is alien. So in many ways for Afghanistan the Taliban is a home grown system, their country their system, how difficult is it to understand and respect. I don't get it. 

'Their country their system' arguement doesn't hold good here. Their system ( or methodical madness) has a direct adverse impact on everyone in the surrounding areas. In terms of ideology and mass movement of refugees. If the people of Afghanistan chose this system and the system had no impact on anyone else, didn't infringe the rights of their own citizens, then one may respect them.

 

But that is not the case. They've basically banished women from all economic/social activity. Don't go by the cute statements they make to the Western press. Those are an eyewash to get aid from the gullible Americans. Look at numbers from the areas where the Taliban were already in power long before the Kabul take over.

Next to no participation of women in any economic activity. Summary executions. Rife corruption ( well to be fair this was the case with the Kabul govt also). Implementation of Sharia. Just because they have the guns, doesn't mean that they are right.

What in this do you want us to respect?

 

Would you say ' their country their system' for the Nazis and just shrug your shoulders?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

'Their country their system' arguement doesn't hold good here. Their system ( or methodical madness) has a direct adverse impact on everyone in the surrounding areas. In terms of ideology and mass movement of refugees. If the people of Afghanistan chose this system and the system had no impact on anyone else, didn't infringe the rights of their own citizens, then one may respect them.

 

But that is not the case. They've basically banished women from all economic/social activity. Don't go by the cute statements they make to the Western press. Those are an eyewash to get aid from the gullible Americans. Look at numbers from the areas where the Taliban were already in power long before the Kabul take over.

Next to no participation of women in any economic activity. Summary executions. Rife corruption ( well to be fair this was the case with the Kabul govt also). Implementation of Sharia. Just because they have the guns, doesn't mean that they are right.

What in this do you want us to respect?

 

Would you say ' their country their system' for the Nazis and just shrug your shoulders?

 

USA tried to change things for 20 years. What can anyone do if they don't want to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...