UrmiSinhaRay Posted May 15, 2018 Posted May 15, 2018 KL rahul is a beast, he's the next Kohli, a batting order of Sharma, Dhawan, Kohli and Rahul will be unstoppable in the next world cupNo Rohit Sharma please.Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk
rkt.india Posted May 15, 2018 Posted May 15, 2018 59 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Aesthetics are difficult to ascertain .I found slater good to watch, he was similar to virat, kind of jabby, punchy approach .Rohit too looks good he is like mark waugh, samson too is in that category .On the other hand i find williamson boring ,i dont know why.One of the batsmen i found most boring was steve waugh. Williamson is as boring as Laxman.
rkt.india Posted May 15, 2018 Posted May 15, 2018 1 hour ago, MultiB48 said: Aesthetics are difficult to ascertain .I found slater good to watch, he was similar to virat, kind of jabby, punchy approach .Rohit too looks good he is like mark waugh, samson too is in that category .On the other hand i find williamson boring ,i dont know why.One of the batsmen i found most boring was steve waugh. not difficult at all. Most bottom hand dominant batsman wont be most aesthetically pleasing to watch. Kohli though is still more attractive than likes of Dhoni and Pujara, who both are also bottom hand batsmen.
Old guy Posted May 15, 2018 Posted May 15, 2018 13 minutes ago, rkt.india said: no..too much bottom hand Samson is my favourite (elegance wise ) from this new generation.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted May 15, 2018 Posted May 15, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, rkt.india said: Good to watch has nothing to do with being successful or being consistent. Kohli is treat to watch? where? No, Kohli has a peculiar stiffness in his batting. His bat flow is stiff and very controlled that makes him effective but not very attractive. Him being bottom-hand player has a lot to do with this. Same with Smith. Smith is an ugly batsman, like Chanderpaul. This thread is about elegance and attractiveness of the batsman and effectiveness. to me he is and so is smith, to each it own choice . I find both their batting attractive yes chanderpaul , raydu i never found pleasent Edited May 15, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03
PBN Posted May 15, 2018 Posted May 15, 2018 19 hours ago, velu said: manjot kalra is for more pleasing to the eye than anyone else .. kalra looked clueless when ball was doing a bit. great on the offside..but loose on that offstump a bit like dhawan. hopefully he can improve/overcome his weakness UrmiSinhaRay and velu 1 1
Pollack Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 Damien Martin was one of my favourites in aesthetics. UrmiSinhaRay 1
gakgupta Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 for me.. Rahana looks better than any other batsmen.... when in full flow, he is just treat on the eyes.... coffee_rules 1
LordPrabhzy Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 2 hours ago, gakgupta said: for me.. Rahul looks better than any other batsmen.... when in full flow, he is just treat on the eyes.... Corrected it for you. You're welcome :) UrmiSinhaRay 1
rkt.india Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 Rahul with most number of 6s and 4s now. UrmiSinhaRay 1
rkt.india Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 On 5/15/2018 at 3:34 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said: to me he is and so is smith, to each it own choice . I find both their batting attractive yes chanderpaul , raydu i never found pleasent Smith is Chanderpaul part 2. You didnt like Chander but likes Smith's batting. This thread isnt about favorite batsman. Smith and Kohli can be your favorite batsman, but attractive batsman to watch, no, they are not. UrmiSinhaRay 1
bowl_out Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 Gets 95, ends up on the losing side. Gets 94, ends up on the losing side. Great player playing for a pathetic team velu, UrmiSinhaRay, coffee_rules and 1 other 1 1 2
express bowling Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 (edited) 13 hours ago, rkt.india said: Smith and Kohli can be your favorite batsman, but attractive batsman to watch, no, they are not. I find both Kohli and Smith very attractive to watch as batsmen. And I have seen / heard many people agree with me on this issue. Attractiveness lies in the mind of the the observer. Edited May 17, 2018 by express bowling UrmiSinhaRay and Mosher 2
Vk1 Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 Rahul and pant. Two contrasting superstar players who may not play world cup. Suhaan 1
kira Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Vk1 said: Rahul and pant. Two contrasting superstar players who may not play world cup. Rahul will most definitely play, however pant will miss out due to selfish dhoni UrmiSinhaRay, raki05, Suhaan and 2 others 5
jusarrived Posted May 16, 2018 Posted May 16, 2018 11 minutes ago, bowl_out said: Gets 95, ends up on the losing side. Gets 94, ends up on the losing side. Great player playing for a pathetic team Agreed the team is mostly responsible , but this is one area he needs to work on . If you add the 100 against wi , this is the third time hes fallen just short . This is where some one like Virat is so special , hopefully he will smarten up Shunya and UrmiSinhaRay 2
wanted_desi Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 Kohli will have hard time benching this man now. UrmiSinhaRay and Gollum 1 1
Suhaan Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 Dont see any reason or any flaw in his batting for which he should be benched....he can play at any position 3,4,5 can even open,if you have floater( at the moment) of his quality you ought to play him UrmiSinhaRay and express bowling 2
Lannister Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 Hope he thrashes CSK bowlers irrespective of Punjab will qualify or not. express bowling and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1
Trichromatic Posted May 17, 2018 Author Posted May 17, 2018 48 minutes ago, wanted_desi said: Kohli will have hard time benching this man now. Well it will be argued that IPL performances don't count. UrmiSinhaRay 1
Recommended Posts