Jump to content

Rohit's 64(34) vs Kohli's 80(52). What is more valuable to team India?


Which is more valuable  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is more valuable

    • Rohit's 64(34)
    • Kohli's 80(52)


Recommended Posts

Posted
Rohit Sharma   b Stokes 64 34 4 5 188.24
Virat Kohli (c) not out 80 52 7 2 153.85
Suryakumar Yadav  c Roy b Rashid 32 17 3 2 188.24
Hardik Pandya  not out 39 17 4 2 229.41

 

 

I think it is hard to compare the two knocks as the two batsmen played different roles, let's look at the boundary % 

 

SDP 35% 

SKY 29%

Rohit 26%

Kohli 17% 

 

So based on boundary %, Rohit knock was relatively better 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Sandeep99 said:

Kohli ensured we ended up with 220

instead of 250

Exactly! In T20 we DONT need someone to bat till the end.  Kohli with his ODI mindset and skillset is killing the team.

 

8 minutes ago, Moochad said:

Credit to Rohit. Played at a terrific SR. Rat was too slow

Imagine if Rohit had got out cheaply. Kohli would have been badly exposed with his inability to force the pace. He might talk intent, try all he might, but with his current form and lack of power, he is a square peg trying to fit into a round hole as far as T20 is concerned. 

Posted

Two grandpas milking their reputations, it was freaking powerplay, even England matched India's powerplay but couldnt match the power innings of SKY and Pandu.

 

Surya and Pandya innings ensured India reached 200 plus

Posted
1 hour ago, Sandeep99 said:

Kohli ensured we ended up with 220

instead of 250

Kohli ensured we ended up with 225 instead of 240 or even 180.

Posted

Kohlis knock was important too. Just look at England's innings, Butler provided them a great start like Rohit did but they couldn't come close to the target set by India because nobody played Kohlis role for them . Had Kohli got dismissed cheaply don't think Iyer, Pandya and Pant would have got India over 200.

 

 

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, kohli said:

Kohli ensured we ended up with 225 instead of 240 or even 180.

 

 

Exactly  !

 

These types of innings ensure that a good enough score is reached ... while killing the chance of an amazing score.

 

In a critical decider like today, I would prefer a good enough score.

 

If it were the first match of the series, I would have preferred an amazing score. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
7 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Exactly  !

 

These types of innings ensure that a good enough score is reached ... while killing the chance of an amazing score.

 

In a critical decider like today, I would prefer a good enough score.

 

If it were the first match of the series, I would have preferred an amazing score. 

 

 

 

 

Exactly would you risk finishing under 200 to get 240+ ..I would settle for 220+ every time ...butler was out end of 12th over ...England 8 wickets in hand ... yet they couldn’t keep swinging on top with dew factor ... 

Posted
18 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said:

Kohli wants to open in future too... opinions...

Opinions. 

Posted

Both are good knocks, you dolts.

 

This is what Kohli should be doing in T20s ; ensuring we get 180+ consistently and the other guys hit around him to elevate it to 220+ sometimes. 

 

180 with Bumrah and Bhuvi is a 80%+ winning score. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...