Jump to content

Pujara named VC for first Bangladesh Test


dilliboy

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I guess Gujara failed in BD A game too....  Lu*d TM & BCCI prefers seniors & add to that VC so he is undroppable. 

KS Bharat & Easwaran are definite upgrades over him who are doing consistently well at A level. 

As @raki05 said mission Gujju quota is on...  With Undercutter coming outta nowhere 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted

LMAO..Pant actually is the best Indian batsman since Kohli in this team and they have given the captaincy to Rohit, Rahul and now put Pujara as vice captain.

 

Actually it is LOIs where you shouldn't make Pant as captain or vice captain. In Tests, you definitely can give him that captaincy or vice captaincy opportunity.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said:

I guess Gujara failed in BD A game too....  Lu*d TM & BCCI prefers seniors & add to that VC so he is undroppable. 

KS Bharat & Easwaran are definite upgrades over him who are doing consistently well at A level. 

As @raki05 said mission Gujju quota is on...  With Undercutter coming outta nowhere 

 

images (90).jpeg

Posted

Had we won that one off game back in 2015 vs Bangers would've been start of the world record - just fell short of one series to win 9(8?) in row till 2017 end vs SL. Life's come a full circle huh, for Brat & co this series will pave the way for our cricket in the next 10 years! Like I said back in 2018 with the Eng tour - Kohli's legacy will be defined by how he leaves the team, for better or for worse he can be our Clive Lloyd or Dhongi part deux :om:

Posted
2 hours ago, dilliboy said:

 

 

What the hell is going on? A guy who wasn't even part of the first XI a couple of series ago is now VC instead of the team's no 1 batsmen in Tests? This team management is really *in with India's present and future 

 

2 hours ago, Number said:

Project "Sideline Pant for KL" in full progress. 

 

2 hours ago, Sgattick10 said:

Wasn't Rishabh Pant the vice captain? Why make over the hill player vc?? :facepalm:

KL Rahul was not even in the team before England series and after playing two series, he is captain of test team.

 

Pujara was dropped after SA tour, came back and is now vice captain of test team. 

 

Pant, an integral member of test team and probably a better test batsman than Rohit is not considered yet. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Majestic said:

 

 

KL Rahul was not even in the team before England series and after playing two series, he is captain of test team.

 

Pujara was dropped after SA tour, came back and is now vice captain of test team. 

 

Pant, an integral member of test team and probably a better test batsman than Rohit is not considered yet. 

 

Cringeworthy to see ROhit and Rahul has captains.  Rohit hardly achieved anything in tests to be our captain. With myrida of fitness issues, he keeps missing test series. Pujara is another one.    Jaiswal, Sarfraz should already be playing for India

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Pant, an integral member of test team and probably a better test batsman than Rohit is not considered yet


Not commenting on whether Pant should or should not be the captain but it is not about the best player becoming the captain but the player with best leadership qualities, which could be for a variety of reasons, becoming the captain. The captain should be good enough to make it to the 11.
 

Edited by zen
Posted

I have a feeling that interview with Harsha has a role to play in whats gone on since. 
somebody clearly did not like the way he reacted to the question.

Posted
15 minutes ago, the don said:

I have a feeling that interview with Harsha has a role to play in whats gone on since. 
somebody clearly did not like the way he reacted to the question.

Which question?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...