raki05 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/had-decided-in-presence-of-virat-kohli-ms-dhoni-not-to-mankad-batsman-in-ipl-chairman-rajeev-shukla/story-8SETqcaTld8DvbZaA9YcfK.html I mean who the hell are Kohli and Dhoni to decide whether mankad is allowed or not? Isn't it all the captain should be apprised about it. This Rajeev Shukla is biggest tool, how the hell he became chairman of ipl Edited March 26, 2019 by raki05 Stan AF, Unstable Joe, Laaloo and 6 others 1 5 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post vvvslaxman Posted March 26, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted March 26, 2019 If they had taken a mild dig and moved on nobody would have had issues. This act of treating Ashwin like criminal is increasingly becoming annoying. He didn't show finger to crowd or used explicit words against opponents or used any lllegal of gaining advantage. Change the law itself. Until then these guys should zip up. Change the rule into "Batsman can have head start as much as they want before releasing the ball" Lannister, bowl_out, nevada and 10 others 1 1 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Then let nonstriker stand beside the striker then. Only striker will need to run and no one would run out the nonstriker even without the courtesy. nevada, Vilander, Gollum and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Read the rule booka tosser. Change the rule if you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) Unfortunately, it was Ashwining not Mankading .... A ban on Ashwin may be on the cards Edited March 26, 2019 by zen Under_Score, velu, The Dark Horse and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, zen said: Unfortunately, it was Ashwining not Mankading .... A ban on Ashwin may be on the cards You are relentless, aren't you ? Sorry no ban, he did nothing against the rules and umpire made the final call. In fact just like Dhaka 2014, he has started a discussion about a sensitive topic which is only good for the sport. Good, force ICC to address this in a watertight manner so that there is more clarity in the future. The cricket world thanks Ravi Ashwin philcric, sergio04, nikred and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 7 minutes ago, Gollum said: You are relentless, aren't you ? Sorry no ban, he did nothing against the rules and umpire made the final call. In fact just like Dhaka 2014, he has started a discussion about a sensitive topic which is only good for the sport. Good, force ICC to address this in a watertight manner so that there is more clarity in the future. The cricket world thanks Ravi Ashwin You are talking to a bot lol flamy, profster, Zelig and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Ab sab mauke pe chauka marne ki koshish kar rahe hain. He at least did not lie under oath. raki05 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 19 minutes ago, Gollum said: You are relentless, aren't you ? Sorry no ban, he did nothing against the rules and umpire made the final call. In fact just like Dhaka 2014, he has started a discussion about a sensitive topic which is only good for the sport. Good, force ICC to address this in a watertight manner so that there is more clarity in the future. The cricket world thanks Ravi Ashwin can't support such: speedheat 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedheat Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, raki05 said: https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/had-decided-in-presence-of-virat-kohli-ms-dhoni-not-to-mankad-batsman-in-ipl-chairman-rajeev-shukla/story-8SETqcaTld8DvbZaA9YcfK.html I mean who the hell are Kohli and Dhoni to decide whether mankad is allowed or not? Isn't it all the captain should be apprised about it. This Rajeev Shukla is biggest tool, how the hell he became chairman of ipl Agree fully. Should have asked bowlers too. IMO ashwin did nothing wrong coz rule permits. raki05 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Global.Baba Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Preeence of Kohli and Dhoni WTF. He is talking like this is an example of taking oath on a holy book. How did this chewt 3rd grade journalist became this powerful anyways raki05, Under_Score and flamy 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkt.india Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 48 minutes ago, zen said: Unfortunately, it was Ashwining not Mankading .... A ban on Ashwin may be on the cards it was umpire's decision. you cannot stop him from appealing. Appealing is not an offence. profster and Gollum 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, rkt.india said: it was umpire's decision. you cannot stop him from appealing. Appealing is not an offence. conning is an offense though .... much like claiming a bump catch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rkt.india Posted March 26, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted March 26, 2019 22 minutes ago, zen said: can't support such: A serial offender does not deserve any sympathy Gollum, The Dark Horse, AuxiliA and 10 others 2 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Global.Baba Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, zen said: conning is an offense though .... much like claiming a bump catch No conning here. Within rules, batsman should keep an eye out for the ball to be released. once again taking advantage of loopholes may not be always “ethical” or is not a crime raki05 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, rkt.india said: A serial offender does not deserve any sympathy You can Mankad the batsman if he is on the wrong side. Not Ashwin him when he is on the right side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Global.Baba said: No conning here. Within rules, batsman should keep an eye out for the ball to be released. once again taking advantage of loopholes may not be always “ethical” or is not a crime He won't change his mind, he keeps repeating the same stuff everywhere . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, Global.Baba said: No conning here. Within rules, batsman should keep an eye out for the ball to be released. once again taking advantage of loopholes may not be always “ethical” or is not a crime 1 Even if you want to believe that, we still have to hold the players to high ethical standards on the field Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, Gollum said: He won't change his mind, he keeps repeating the same stuff everywhere . much like that filtered stats lol The Dark Horse and flamy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Ethical like this lol. Pollard tried to cheat a run and got away. MI batsman Kieron Pollard's aim on Thursday night was to win at all costs, not playing in the spirit of the game. (Scorecard) Read more at: https://www.mykhel.com/cricket/ipl-mi-s-kieron-pollard-cheats-trying-win-but-fails-009935.html The Dark Horse, Laaloo and flamy 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts