Popular Post Gollum Posted July 9, 2019 Popular Post Posted July 9, 2019 (edited) What sin has he committed? Ignored for whole of 2017 CT and again being treated unfairly here. Outstanding WC stats, lit 2015 WC on fire, 14 wickets in 4 matches here including a 5fer and a hat-trick. Is he sitting in the sidelines to accommodate a Mcgrath or Ambrose? Gutted for him, can't explain my disappointment, irrespective of whether we win/lose this is a colossal * up. I am done with this TM, selfish, nepotistic, corrupt mofos. Next time some fanboy hypes up Kohli's captaincy....chalo leave it. So so sad..... Edited July 9, 2019 by Gollum Hell Raiser, nevada, Mosher and 14 others 1 7 1 8
Gollum Posted July 9, 2019 Author Posted July 9, 2019 On the same ground against WI he got 4/16...simply unplayable that day. Against NZ he won the MOS a few months back, unke ghar mein. Vijy, nevada and Stradlater 3
Nikola Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Sad he missed out but let's not be so negative about bhuvi before even match is started. Who knows he might be highest wicket taker today? hope for best. WeStMiDz and Nonbeliever 2
Rightarmfast Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Just now, Nikola said: Sad he missed out but let's not be so negative about bhuvi before even match is started. Who knows he might be highest wicket taker today? hope for best. ... But be prepared for the worst. Strong chances the worst could happen today.
sandeep Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Shami should have played instead of Jaddu. It is not ambiguous. This is a **** selection. sandsaims, Gollum and chewy 3
Gollum Posted July 9, 2019 Author Posted July 9, 2019 59 minutes ago, Nikola said: Sad he missed out but let's not be so negative about bhuvi before even match is started. Who knows he might be highest wicket taker today? hope for best. Thought process also counts bhai, we shouldn't make things more difficult for ourselves when there's so much at stake.
Nikola Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Gollum said: Thought process also counts bhai, we shouldn't make things more difficult for ourselves when there's so much at stake. can't do anything else than supporting what's our today's playing xi is. sandeep 1
Gollum Posted July 9, 2019 Author Posted July 9, 2019 The way Bumrah maintained pressure, Shami would have been in the wickets column, and he wouldn't have wasted a review in desperation.
Deleted_User_1 Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Shami se galti hua ke woh Bewda ko text nahin Kiya. ViruDilSeKhelo 1
maniac Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 (edited) Both Kuldeep and Shami should have been in. Once again Bew-Rat inexplicable selection potentially costs us a winnable game Edited July 9, 2019 by maniac
CG Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Shami is a match winner like Bumrah so he should have played.
nevada Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 2 hours ago, sandeep said: Shami should have played instead of Jaddu. It is not ambiguous. This is a **** selection. I would have kept Jaddu and dropped DK for Shami. DK is in the X1 as batting insurance but that is defensive thinking. If you are gonna gamble, bet on a potential match winner, not on a support cast.
addicted4444 Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 The thinking is likely that the Indian batting is good enough to score about 250-280 consistently against anybody. At the same time, they’re pretty much incapable of scoring 300+. So the Indian team is playing it safe and going with a lineup which is most likely to hold any batting lineup under 300. Shami may take a bunch of wickets and get a team to score 210 all out instead of 240/7 which we may get with Bhuvi. However, both are scores the Indian batting can win. On the flip side, poor death bowling can mean that a 290 score under Bhuvi may go up to 315 with Shami. The former may be achieved by the Indian batting. The latter won’t. nevada and New guy 2
Cricketics Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Good day for Shami to do "ladkibaazi" on Instagram. ViruDilSeKhelo 1
ViruDilSeKhelo Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 (edited) It is sad but the simple reason is that he can't bat. This shouldn't matter when you already have Jadeja at 8 instead of useless Kuldeep. You don't need Bhuvi at 9 for batting, it's over kill and defensive silly captain. Dhoni would never do this. Freaking Kuldeep has an FC ton, please tell me the bowlers he faced and team, he can't hold a bat. I want to slap these bowlers. Edited July 9, 2019 by ViruDilSeKhelo
New guy Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 3 hours ago, Gollum said: The way Bumrah maintained pressure, Shami would have been in the wickets column, and he wouldn't have wasted a review in desperation. Lol he would have gone for 50 runs at death undoing everything Switchblade and coffee_rules 1 1
Adorable Fan Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 Seriously feel bad for Shami. He has the near best strike rate for wickets this WC. The defensive mentality of TM is cringeworthy.
New guy Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, ViruDilSeKhelo said: It is sad but the simple reason is that he can't bat. This shouldn't matter when you already have Jadeja at 8 instead of useless Kuldeep. You don't need Bhuvi at 9 for batting, it's over kill and defensive silly captain. Dhoni would never do this. Freaking Kuldeep has an FC ton, please tell me the bowlers he faced and team, he can't hold a bat. I want to slap these bowlers. Nope Bhuvi is being selected only because of his death bowling, not batting. The only match we lost Shami gave away 44 in 3 overs Switchblade and addicted4444 1 1
New guy Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 3 hours ago, maniac said: Both Kuldeep and Shami should have been in. Once again Bew-Rat inexplicable selection potentially costs us a winnable game Yeah so that we should be chasing 275+ instead of the 230 we would now Switchblade and beetle 1 1
cowboysfan Posted July 9, 2019 Posted July 9, 2019 It was the wrong decision,i feel kiwis would have been bundled out for 150 with shami.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now