Jump to content

How does Pujara compare to Dravid ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I see the same steely determination. Hard to separate the two. Pujara is still not as prolific in terms of run scoring like Dravid was at his peak.

 

But I think he is as effective as Dravid was at his peak.

 

Hopefully he has another 4 years at-least.

Posted

Ind has had some great batsmen over the years but looking at Pujara’s legendary performances at critical junctures in Aus over the two full series (including two amazing 4th innings performances), I would be tempted to put Pujara as #1 test batsman from Ind ever from among the ones that I have followed extensively (from say from 1990) 

Posted
Just now, zen said:

Ind has had some great batsmen over the years but looking at Pujara’s legendary performances at critical junctures in Aus over the two full series (including two amazing 4th innings performances), I would be tempted to put Pujara as #1 test batsman from Ind ever from among the ones that I have followed extensively (from say from 1990) 

I am tempted to give that honor to Rishabh Pant.  

Posted

Dravid is better to watch aesthetically and has the other gear once in a while which Pujara doesn’t.

 

Pujara has his utility in how own way too.

 

Different types of players that get compared only due to their slow strike rate.

 

Pujara is actually a much enhanced version of guys like Shastri who played great % defensive cricket

Posted (edited)

Both will be legends of their times, but Dravid had better support from the other end with SRT, dada & VVS, Viru Pujara has to play around with slightly lesser support.

Edited by IndianRenegade
Posted

Dravid was my favorite for the impact he used to have on Indian test team. Pujara has done a lot of similar things for Indian on 2 occasions now in Australian tour.

 

Let us say that Pujara looks up to Dravid, and I am happy to leave it there. I am glad all his life he looked up to Dravid, right since he was making his debut. There isn't any bigger gentlmen in the game than Rahul Dravid. You can match him, you can't better him. Him being coach to these under19 players also is the best thing to have happened to Indan Cricket. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, helperononline said:

I donno why people critize him so much for strike rate actually he is having better strike rate than dravid

 

Pujara strike rate in test -45

Dravid strike rate in test - 42

Dravid was lucky in comparison as he had stroke makers like Viru, SRT, VVS to play alongside him

Posted

Dravid's performance in 2011 England series, 2003-04 Australia series and 2002-03 England series are truly great ones.

 

Dravid is an ATG for me, Pujara is a test great.

Posted

As far as performance against Australia goes, Pujara has outperformed Dravid by a country mile

 

Runs, Batting Avg vs Aus (Min 1000 runs)

 

Sachin - 3630, 55

Laxman - 2434, 50

Viru - 1738, 42

Dravid - 2143, 40

 

Pujara - 1893, 54

Kohli - 1682, 48

Vijay- 1324, 47

Rahane - 1090, 38

 

 

 

Clearly Dravid was the 4th best Indian batsman of his generation where as Pujara is the best Indian batsman of his generation

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Played 928 deliveries this series

 

And 1258 in the last series (500+ runs & 4 50+ scores incl 3 100s)  ... Besides playing 928 deliveries in this series including in the first inning in the pink ball test and some grinding at Melbourne, almost come back to his best (after a long lay off; no IPL) in the last 2 tests to hit 3 50s (most by an Ind batsman in this series too)  in 4 innings 

Edited by zen
Posted

I never truly appreciated Dravid because of Dravid fans always trying to belittle Sachin but in hindsight I have to say Dravid was a great player and way more aesthetically pleasing than Pujara. Pujara is a great player too but he is still not on Dravid's level. Pujara still won us back to back series in Australia so I have nothing but respect for Pujara

Posted

We all love Pujara but unfair to compare him to RD.

Dravid had many more memorable performances in wins and hard fought draws.

In terms of average and high scoring abilities Pujara is a clearly a notch below.

 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

Dravid was my favorite for the impact he used to have on Indian test team. Pujara has done a lot of similar things for Indian on 2 occasions now in Australian tour.

 

Let us say that Pujara looks up to Dravid, and I am happy to leave it there. I am glad all his life he looked up to Dravid, right since he was making his debut. There isn't any bigger gentlmen in the game than Rahul Dravid. You can match him, you can't better him. Him being coach to these under19 players also is the best thing to have happened to Indan Cricket. 

 

On a related note, I think we should have comparison-free day every week on ICF.  Say, every Monday, we will refrain from comparing Indian players to one another. 

No "Who is better?"  "X" vs "Y" posts.  

 

  

Posted (edited)

Dravid way more skilled, miles ahead. Dravid held his own during insane peak of Ponting, averaged near 60. Was overshadowed by Lara and Tendulkar in the beginning of his career. Sangakkara and Kallis stole the limelight during the end of his career.

 

Pujara is comparable to Chanderpaul and Younus Khan. He is a great test batsmen no doubt, but Dravid is in the league of ATGs.

 

Dravid the slip catcher, test batsman and ODI record (way too similar to Inzimam) puts him in top 5 overall Cricketer India ever produced.

 

 

 

.

Edited by Vancouver

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...