Sgattick10 Posted March 7, 2021 Posted March 7, 2021 (edited) https://www.instagram.com/p/CMFkDNrJmzV/?igshid=1cdenpsso1wt1 https://www.instagram.com/p/CMFr-WVlp2J/?igshid=1gz5vddgt6y86 https://www.instagram.com/p/CMFf7A1BUFu/?igshid=13bxtsa7875gh Edited March 7, 2021 by Sgattick10
Sgattick10 Posted March 7, 2021 Author Posted March 7, 2021 This one is his second daughter, how old is she?
Autonomous Posted March 7, 2021 Posted March 7, 2021 23 minutes ago, Sgattick10 said: This one is his second daughter, how old is she? Should be 16-18
coffee_rules Posted March 7, 2021 Posted March 7, 2021 (edited) How are they related? Apprently, not. I thought they were cousins. Edited March 7, 2021 by coffee_rules RAZPOR, Norman, Yoda-esque and 2 others 1 4
Popular Post coffee_rules Posted March 7, 2021 Popular Post Posted March 7, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Sgattick10 said: This one is his second daughter, how old is she? report says eldest daughter. Shaheen has 7 brothers and Aqsa has 4 sisters. The two sides siblings can form a unisex PSL team https://www.timesnownews.com/amp/sports/cricket/article/shahid-afridi-confirms-his-daughter-to-tie-knot-with-pakistan-cricketer-shaheen-afridi-match-made-in-heaven/729283?__twitter_impression=true Edited March 7, 2021 by coffee_rules raki05, sorak, Norman and 8 others 11
ravishingravi Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 First time in recorded human history. Father and daughter are of same age. velu, dial_100, Yoda-esque and 1 other 1 3
Clarke Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 (edited) 17 hours ago, Autonomous said: Should be 16-18 Is there a fetish for young girls in some countries ? They simply ignore education & mental development and just want a fresh one ? That Babar Azam story may have been a rumor, did Babar deny it or was he also into this fetish ? Edited March 8, 2021 by Clarke RAZPOR 1
Autonomous Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Clarke said: Is there a fetish for young girls in some countries ? They simply ignore education & mental development and just want a fresh one ? That Babar Azam story may have been a rumor, did Babar deny it or was he also into this fetish ? Babar was with an aunty, even if it is true. mishra 1
rangeelaraja Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 (edited) Surprisingly amongst the ***** tribe, the son in law calls the father in law by his casual name “Lala”. Edited March 8, 2021 by sandeep Moderator Note: Gratuitous flamebaiting and religion based insults are not what we want on this forum. Trash belongs in the garbage can, don't fling it on this forum. coffee_rules, Cricketics, raki05 and 1 other 4
Yoda-esque Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 Not sure whether Afridi will allow Shaheen more than one wife.As I recollect, one of his life's disappointments was not having more than one begum.
sandeep Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 40 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said: Surprisingly amongst the ***** tribe, the son in law calls the father in law by his casual name “Lala”. Consider this a "soft" warning - I don't want to get into the warning points and temp bans unless I absolutely have to. I know you have a pet hobby and obsession with our neighbors - a bit of a love-hate relationship! - but I don't want this forum to descend into the gutter.
Clarke Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said: Not sure whether Afridi will allow Shaheen more than one wife.As I recollect, one of his life's disappointments was not having more than one begum. Thats coz he didn't use kaali daal, learn from the Prime Minister. Edited March 8, 2021 by Clarke Laaloo and Norman 2
rangeelaraja Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, sandeep said: Consider this a "soft" warning - I don't want to get into the warning points and temp bans unless I absolutely have to. I know you have a pet hobby and obsession with our neighbors - a bit of a love-hate relationship! - but I don't want this forum to descend into the gutter. First of read what I wrote. It was not a slight on any religion but a tribe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afridi This tribe has been documented by historians to be exceptionally barbaric, primitive and perpetually war-mongering. They also run the biggest illegal arms market in the world in Darra Adam Khel and a huge network of opium drugs. You can respect them if it suits you. I don't. Quote After the creation of Pakistan, Afridi tribesmen also helped attack Jammu and Kashmir for Pakistan during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1947.[5] Today, Afridis make use of their dominant social position in areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa by controlling transport and various businesses, including trade in arms, munitions and goods.[1] Edited March 8, 2021 by rangeelaraja sandeep 1
zen Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 The daughter appears to be too young to get married esp. in an arranged one involving “elders” as match makers (love can have its own criteria)
rangeelaraja Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, zen said: The daughter appears to be too young to get married esp. in an arranged one involving “elders” as match makers (love can have its own criteria) It is a tribal code of conduct based on chronicled history that has not changed. Read below. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244019829546 Quote One such account that creates an oriental picture of the tribal Pashtuns, especially the Afridi tribes, is by Edward Oliver (1890). According to him, the Afridi tribes on the border were the “most lawless and savage of Pathans (Pashtuns)” (Oliver, 1890, p. 183). In another account, Warburton (1900) also talking about the Afridi tribes says that they are “brought up as kids to distrust all mankind” (p. 342). He further quotes Lieutenant Colonel Frederick Mackeson saying that the Afridis were the “most avaricious race desperately fond of money” (Warburton, 1900, p. 342). He also quotes Lord Lytton’s experience of dealing and relations with the Pashtun tribes, calling them “Semi-savages” (Warburton, 1900, pp. 7-8). Moreover, Warburton (1900) himself describes the tribal Pashtuns as “savages of the independent hill” (p. 205). Similarly, Sir Richard Temple, Secretary to the Chief Commissioner of Punjab, in his communications with the British government described the Pashtun tribes as “noble savages. . . who were absolutely barbarian nevertheless” And then you have holier than thou moderator, who I can evidently expose for hypocrisy threatening to abuse his powers. Edited March 8, 2021 by rangeelaraja
sandeep Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, rangeelaraja said: First of read what I wrote. It was not a slight on any religion but a tribe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afridi This tribe has been documented by historians to be exceptionally barbaric, primitive and perpetually war-mongering. They also run the biggest illegal arms market in the world in Darra Adam Khel and a huge network of opium drugs. You can respect them if it suits you. I don't. By that logic, you follow a cruel primitive religion that burns widows, treats poor people as untouchable, punishing them if their shadow falls on high born castes, and forces women of lower castes to walk in publicly with their breasts exposed. Disclaimer: My words above are not serious, but only to point out explicitly that @rangeelaraja's "logic" is spurious and silly, and can be similarly deployed in defense of bigotry against any group. You are entitled to your personal prejudices and have all the right to argue on this forum. Do not abuse that privilege. Do not lower the quality of discussion on this forum by assuming you have the right to litter it by spitting your bigoted views. Filter yourself on your own, or you will be filtered in ways that you do not control. Edited March 8, 2021 by sandeep dial_100, EnterTheVoid, wc2023 and 1 other 2 2
dial_100 Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 53 minutes ago, sandeep said: By that logic, you follow a cruel primitive religion that burns widows, treats poor people as untouchable, punishing them if their shadow falls on high born castes, and forces women of lower castes to walk in publicly with their breasts exposed. You are entitled to your personal prejudices and have all the right to argue on this forum. Do not abuse that privilege. Do not lower the quality of discussion on this forum by assuming you have the right to litter it by spitting your bigoted views. Filter yourself on your own, or you will be filtered in ways that you do not control. I dont have issues with you taking stand and even I support up to that point. But why go overboard to put your point across. Dont you think your comment will hurt others who have nothing to do with this discussion. And well you are MOD here.
sandeep Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 Just now, dial_100 said: I dont have issues with you taking stand and even I support up to that point. But why go overboard to put your point across. Dont you think your comment will hurt others who have nothing to do with this discussion. And well you are MOD here. I know that you are well aware that I do not mean any of it. I find it curious that "hurt" is felt and used selectively to complain about posts. Clearly, the potential for hurt in the posts above that one was not one that bothered some folks. If you are going to use 'wikipedia' nonsense to claim "factual basis" for bigotry, that is a double-edged sword. Sometimes examples need to be spelled out to make that point. But even though I consider your motives for arguing about this 'suspect', I will still accept your feedback that the comment is not ideal. I will add a disclaimer to it.
rangeelaraja Posted March 8, 2021 Posted March 8, 2021 1 hour ago, sandeep said: By that logic, you follow a cruel primitive religion that burns widows, treats poor people as untouchable, punishing them if their shadow falls on high born castes, and forces women of lower castes to walk in publicly with their breasts exposed. You are entitled to your personal prejudices and have all the right to argue on this forum. Do not abuse that privilege. Do not lower the quality of discussion on this forum by assuming you have the right to litter it by spitting your bigoted views. Filter yourself on your own, or you will be filtered in ways that you do not control. I can show you a dozen instances where YOU have spouted worse bigoted views. Would you like to see ? Maybe being the moderator gives you that "privilege". I can understand mentality of someone like you. When you are powerless in your real life, with an unsuccessful career and having a bad Monday, threatening to use moderator rights on a cricket forum is the only way in life to show your "power". sandeep 1
Recommended Posts