Austin 3:!6 Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 (edited) Looks like still not fit and did not play the 1st two games in IPL. Did play today but not bowled a single ball and could manage to get only 2 runs. He flopped badly in the Srilanka series too. Not sure how can selectors pick him in world cup side as an all rounder. Edited September 26, 2021 by Austin 3:!6 adkrish22290, beetle and Adamant 1 2
Austin 3:!6 Posted September 26, 2021 Author Posted September 26, 2021 10 minutes ago, Majestic said: He will bowl in WT20 though. So we are going by his words? What is his bowling form? Is he good enough to bowl 4 overs? Adamant and Cricspin 2
Lord Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 batting will be okay. Bowling is huge concern
Majestic Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 18 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: So we are going by his words? What is his bowling form? Is he good enough to bowl 4 overs? He doesn't need to bowl 4 overs. He is a sixth bowler in the side. I agree that he was hyped to the moon based on his potential level but unless someone has a poor day with bowl, he doesn't really need to bowl anything more than 2 overs. If I will worry of one thing, then it is his hitting ability which is a serious concern on these pitches.
rangeelaraja Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 Hardik Pandya is not very dissimilar to Vinod Kambli in many many aspects - attitude being the most important one. I would any day of the week have Shardul Thakur in my team ahead of this guy. Norman, raki05, AuxiliA and 3 others 6
raki05 Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 49 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Looks like still not fit and did not play the 1st two games in IPL. Did play today but not bowled a single ball and could manage to get only 2 runs. He flopped badly in the Srilanka series too. Not sure how can selectors pick him in world cup side as an all rounder. Absolutely not, thakur and chahar deserve spot in xi than this clown. coffee_rules, Adamant, beetle and 5 others 8
Norman Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 I'd rather have Thakur at 6 than Pandya. We should have groomed one of Tewatia, Parag, Samad, Harshal etc for no.6 instead of giving one chance after other to Pandey.. Adamant, rangeelaraja and raki05 3
Adamant Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 1 hour ago, rangeelaraja said: Hardik Pandya is not very dissimilar to Vinod Kambli in many many aspects - attitude being the most important one. Kambli managed to avg 54 in test cricket, this guy hasn't done anything noteworthy. Cricspin, raki05 and sorak 3
Adamant Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 Now some lallu will come in and tell us how he is important for us in t20 WC, But the fact is how is he even getting selected? What has he done this year? Even his t20 record is poor, not even one 50, ghatiya bowling record. He needs to prove that he is fit before t20 Wc, otherwise BCCI should just dump him and forget that a player named Hardik ever existed. adkrish22290, Cricspin and raki05 3
jf1gp_1 Posted September 26, 2021 Posted September 26, 2021 What we need is Pandya we saw in Australia. He was calm in control most of the time. Given his current struggles with fitness I am unsure how he got selected unless he picked up something during nets which MI is not disclosing. raki05 and Norman 2
The Realist Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 Why is he always injured? Never fit? Only played a third of India's games in the last couple of years.
R!TTER Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 For the amount of money he gets, even compared to Thakur heck Pujara, he should he doing Symonds level stuff - his returns in recent years are Afridiesque! raki05 and sandeep 2
Lone Wolf Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 His back is too weak & he lacks muscle mass & needed some high amount of strength & conditioning. He can't have a decent career with those drawbacks adkrish22290 1
Khota Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 He never deserved to be n any Indian team. Bowling fast does not make you a bowler. You need variation also. raki05 and sandeep 1 1
Pollack Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 Yes. He is important player for our teams balance provided he is fit and will bowl.
rkt.india Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 2 hours ago, Khota said: He never deserved to be n any Indian team. Bowling fast does not make you a bowler. You need variation also. He is probably best in terms of variations but he has hardly played anything. I don't know on what basis he is going to play.
zen Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 (edited) Ind’s best lower middle order batsman. If you do not pick SDP, there is no zing in Ind team If you want to see a team of boring cricketers like Rohit, Kohli, KL, etc., seeking to play a 40 ball 50, Ind can’t complain if it do not win ICC events (probably deserves not to win those) Edited September 27, 2021 by zen
Adamant Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 1 minute ago, zen said: Ind’s best lower middle order batsman. If you do not pick SDP, there is no zing in Ind team If we pick him there still won't be any zing in the team coz he would be sitting out due to a niggle he got when pressing controller buttons while playing Fifa online. raki05 1
rkt.india Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, zen said: Ind’s best lower middle order batsman. If you do not pick SDP, there is no zing in Ind team If you want to see a team of boring cricketers like Rohit, Kohli, KL, etc., seeking to play a 40 ball 50, Ind can’t complain if you do not win ICC events 150-160 are going to be winning totals in this wc. 40 ball 50 is going to be good. coffee_rules 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now