Jump to content

Why is he embarrassing himself

Sgattick10

By Sgattick10
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
NameGoesHere Mentor

NameGoesHere

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

Sigh OP, what nonsense.

 

I’m so disappointed in the typical unthinking attitudes of people here. Grow up will you.  

 

First of all Pakistan’s unique geostrategic position, at the crossroads of empires and history, translates obviously into an equivalent position as a natural peer amongst the cricketing superpowers.  This, as any reasonable person would agree, is not open to debate.  It is a logical conclusion then that any exclusive global tournament of elite tier rivals must have Pakistan as a participant. 

 

Then, we cannot fail to recall how Pakistan single handed brought down not one but two great empires - USSR and American.  In fact, go back far enough and one sees that it even defeated that greatest of conquerors - Sikandar.  Thus, Pakistan’s own track record as a proud nation of warriors ensures spirited contests in any world ticket tournament.  In short, such a team of fierce cricket battlers are guaranteed to set stadia on fire and excite audiences wherever they go!

 

I’m also deeply disappointed that India so far refuses to acknowledge its debts to Pakistan.  The real victim of terrorism in the past decades has really been Pakistan.  In fact the Mumbai attacks of 2008 (by non state actors who could have belonged to any state) resulted in huge financial, emotional and human losses to Pakistan.  The least that India do as recompense is to help Pakistan to their natural position as a leader in the world of cricket.

 

Finally, we can all frankly admit that  India is a poor nation ridden by problems of caste, religion and and class that has got somewhat fortunate enough in developing its cricket infrastructure.  Pakistan on the other hand is a nation with rich natural and human resources, deserving of the elite category, except that it has been stymied by a few temporary misfortunes.  We must be capable of more mature analyses devoid of sentiment, but which reflect the true sociopolitical and economic reality.

Edited by NameGoesHere
Real McCoy Veteran

Real McCoy

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, NameGoesHere said:

Sigh OP, what nonsense.

 

I’m so disappointed in the typical unthinking attitudes of people here. Grow up will you.  

 

First of all Pakistan’s unique geostrategic position, at the crossroads of empires and history, translates obviously into an equivalent position as a natural peer amongst the cricketing superpowers.  This, as any reasonable person would agree, is not open to debate.  It is a logical conclusion then that any exclusive global tournament of elite tier rivals must have Pakistan as a participant. 

 

Then, we cannot fail to recall how Pakistan single handed brought down not one but two great empires - USSR and American.  In fact, go back far enough and one sees that it even defeated that greatest of conquerors - Sikandar.  Thus, Pakistan’s own track record as a proud nation of warriors ensures spirited contests in any world ticket tournament.  In short, such a team of fierce cricket battlers are guaranteed to set stadia on fire and excite audiences wherever they go!

 

I’m also deeply disappointed that India so far refuses to acknowledge its debts to Pakistan.  The real victim of terrorism in the past decades has really been Pakistan.  In fact the Mumbai attacks of 2008 (by non state actors who could have belonged to any state) resulted in huge financial, emotional and human losses to Pakistan.  The least that India do as recompense is to help Pakistan to their natural position as a leader in the world of cricket.

 

Finally, we can all frankly admit that  India is a poor nation ridden by problems of caste, religion and and class that has got somewhat fortunate enough in developing its cricket infrastructure.  Pakistan on the other hand is a nation with rich natural and human resources, deserving of the elite category, except that it has been stymied by a few temporary misfortunes.  We must be capable of more mature analyses devoid of sentiment, but which reflect the true sociopolitical and economic reality.

You Sound Dumb GIFs | Tenor

sandeep Grand Master

sandeep

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, NameGoesHere said:

Sigh OP, what nonsense.

 

I’m so disappointed in the typical unthinking attitudes of people here. Grow up will you.  

 

First of all Pakistan’s unique geostrategic position, at the crossroads of empires and history, translates obviously into an equivalent position as a natural peer amongst the cricketing superpowers.  This, as any reasonable person would agree, is not open to debate.  It is a logical conclusion then that any exclusive global tournament of elite tier rivals must have Pakistan as a participant. 

 

Then, we cannot fail to recall how Pakistan single handed brought down not one but two great empires - USSR and American.  In fact, go back far enough and one sees that it even defeated that greatest of conquerors - Sikandar.  Thus, Pakistan’s own track record as a proud nation of warriors ensures spirited contests in any world ticket tournament.  In short, such a team of fierce cricket battlers are guaranteed to set stadia on fire and excite audiences wherever they go!

 

I’m also deeply disappointed that India so far refuses to acknowledge its debts to Pakistan.  The real victim of terrorism in the past decades has really been Pakistan.  In fact the Mumbai attacks of 2008 (by non state actors who could have belonged to any state) resulted in huge financial, emotional and human losses to Pakistan.  The least that India do as recompense is to help Pakistan to their natural position as a leader in the world of cricket.

 

Finally, we can all frankly admit that  India is a poor nation ridden by problems of caste, religion and and class that has got somewhat fortunate enough in developing its cricket infrastructure.  Pakistan on the other hand is a nation with rich natural and human resources, deserving of the elite category, except that it has been stymied by a few temporary misfortunes.  We must be capable of more mature analyses devoid of sentiment, but which reflect the true sociopolitical and economic reality.

* me that's quality.

goose Grand Master

goose

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, NameGoesHere said:

Sigh OP, what nonsense.

 

I’m so disappointed in the typical unthinking attitudes of people here. Grow up will you.  

 

First of all Pakistan’s unique geostrategic position, at the crossroads of empires and history, translates obviously into an equivalent position as a natural peer amongst the cricketing superpowers.  This, as any reasonable person would agree, is not open to debate.  It is a logical conclusion then that any exclusive global tournament of elite tier rivals must have Pakistan as a participant. 

 

Then, we cannot fail to recall how Pakistan single handed brought down not one but two great empires - USSR and American.  In fact, go back far enough and one sees that it even defeated that greatest of conquerors - Sikandar.  Thus, Pakistan’s own track record as a proud nation of warriors ensures spirited contests in any world ticket tournament.  In short, such a team of fierce cricket battlers are guaranteed to set stadia on fire and excite audiences wherever they go!

 

I’m also deeply disappointed that India so far refuses to acknowledge its debts to Pakistan.  The real victim of terrorism in the past decades has really been Pakistan.  In fact the Mumbai attacks of 2008 (by non state actors who could have belonged to any state) resulted in huge financial, emotional and human losses to Pakistan.  The least that India do as recompense is to help Pakistan to their natural position as a leader in the world of cricket.

 

Finally, we can all frankly admit that  India is a poor nation ridden by problems of caste, religion and and class that has got somewhat fortunate enough in developing its cricket infrastructure.  Pakistan on the other hand is a nation with rich natural and human resources, deserving of the elite category, except that it has been stymied by a few temporary misfortunes.  We must be capable of more mature analyses devoid of sentiment, but which reflect the true sociopolitical and economic reality.

 

f*k off you baki

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...