Jump to content

3rd Test : Pitch


Recommended Posts

Posted

There is going to be another selection blunder tomorrow. We will go with a batsman short. Should go with Dhawan or Rohit for Pandya. 

 

Rahul 

Vijay

Pujara 

Kohli

Rahane

Rohit/Dhawan 

Dinesh 

Bhuvi 

Bumrah 

Shami 

Ishant. 

 

Batting looks very deep all of a sudden. Should give 100%. There are no dead rubbers in TESTS. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, chewy said:

I thought there is a drought in South Africa :lol: 

doesnt look like it by that green picture 

I think they ll cut off.. Tomo morning :eyedance: or Rohit,Dhawan and co. Will dance on that pitch :aha: 

 

All FTBs exposed 

Posted

From Cricbuzz, justifying why doctoring green pitches is fine compared to turners :facepalm: total nonsense justifications

 

cant believe the Indian journalist doesn’t provide a rebuttal but accepts the fact.  No wonder a perception is built that performances in SA or england are more valuable

 

 

http://m.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/99860/series-chatter-will-sa-follow-ipl-auction-in-peace-and-are-india-really-the-best-test-team

 

How are Faf du Plessis's demands for a pitch (like the one at Cape Town) any different to India's Turner at Nagpur? Why is one extreme and the other not?

 

 

Tristan: My feeling is that his request is similar, but there is a difference in the way that the two types of conditions are prepared and behave. With South African conditions, it is possible to prepare a pitch that suits fast bowling at the start but also has something for the batsmen - the pitch at Newlands was actually good for batting on Day 2, and would have been even better on Day 3 if it was not for the rain, which then spiced things up again for Day 4. That shows there was at least some variance in conditions with periods where different types of players came into the game, which was not always the case when South Africa were in India. When Dean Elgar, a self-confessed "pie-chucker", is taking 4 for 22 in a Test against India, you've probably taken things too far.

 

 

South Africa's request has also been for "pace and bounce", which does not have to translate into a three-day game. You can have attractive pace and bounce that aids both bowlers and batsmen at various points of a game that lasts five days. I guess the problem is that if you want to prepare a wicket with serious turn from Day 1, it's only ever going to favour the bowlers because it will inevitably deteriorate further. And as a consequence of that, the toss becomes overly important. It's a pity that India won every toss of the 2015 series, and South Africa have won both tosses on this tour. The experiences in both series lend weight to the argument that we should do away with the toss and let the away team decide what they would like to do first.

Posted (edited)

@chewy I made this point in an earlier thread, copy pasting here.

 

More than goras I want to abuse all the brown nosers who criticized the home pitches of 2015-17 and downplayed our staggering home run. Same guys prostrate before the goras (esp SA, Eng) who get wins on doctored pitches on their turf. I won't lump Aus with those 2 because IMO Aus always provides fair pitches for all teams.   

On 1/8/2018 at 9:28 PM, Gollum said:

Kanpur 2008 (India vs SA)

http://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricket-scorecard/3865/ind-vs-rsa-3rd-test-south-africa-in-india-test-series-2008  (India won)

Team scores = 265, 325, 121, 64/2

Total runs scored for the loss of 32 wickets = 775

Avg runs/wicket = 24.22

Top scores in 1st and 2nd innings from either team = 1st innings Ganguly 87, 2nd innings Graeme Smith 35 (Ganguly 13*, Dravid 18*)

Distribution of wickets = 18-14 in favor of spinners

Match ref = Mahanama

Pitch rated as poor by ICC (still remember the moaning by Saffers esp Graeme Smith after the match got over :facepalm:, a match where we batted last)

 

Mohali 2015 (India vs SA)

https://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricket-scorecard/15069/ind-vs-rsa-1st-test-south-africa-tour-of-india-2015  (India won)

Team scores = 201, 184, 200, 109

Total runs scored for the loss of 40 wickets = 694

Avg runs/wicket = 17.35

Top scores in 1st and 2nd innings from either team = 1st innings Vijay 75, 2nd innings Pujara 77

Distribution of wickets = 35-5 in favor of spinners

Match ref = Jeff Crowe

Pitch rated as poor by ICC

 

Pune 2017 (Aus vs India)

http://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricket-scorecard/17399/ind-vs-aus-1st-test-australia-test-tour-of-india-2017  (Aus won)

Team scores = 260, 105, 285, 107

Total runs scored for the loss of 40 wickets = 757

Avg runs/wicket = 18.92

Top scores in 1st and 2nd innings from either team = 1st innings Renshaw 68, 2nd innings Smith 109

Distribution of wickets = 31-9 in favor of spinners

Match ref = Chris Broad

Pitch rated as poor by ICC

 

Cape Town 2017 (India vs SA)

http://www.cricbuzz.com/live-cricket-scores/19157/rsa-vs-ind-1st-test-india-tour-of-south-africa-2017-18  (SA won)

Team scores = 286, 209, 130, 135

Total runs scored for the loss of 40 wickets = 760

Average runs/wicket = 19

Top scores in 1st and 2nd innings from either team = 1st innings Pandya 93, 2nd innings Ashwin 37

Distribution of wickets = 38-2 in favor of quicks

Match ref = Chris Broad

Pitch rating by ICC = yet to be released but people are going gaga about the excellent pitch and appreciating the great job done by the curator.

 

P.S. I don't think any of these pitches are poor, variety is an essence of cricket and it is good to test the over rated batsmen every once in a while in an age of flat decks. In fact if any pitch deserves to be rated poor, it should be the one where 1500+ runs are scored in 5 days with no result in sight. As you can see, batsmen who applied themselves have got runs in all the above 4 matches. Somehow I feel there is bias when it comes to pitch preparation by goras viz a viz Indians. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Khota said:

There is aomething called home advantage. No need to get upset. Their home their pitch.

Woh sab to theek hai. But when we use home advantage entire cricketing community starts rona-dhona, worse even some of our guys join the goras in castigating the Indian curators, so many poor pitch ratings in India home matches compared to SA, Eng. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Woh sab to theek hai. But when we use home advantage entire cricketing community starts rona-dhona, worse even some of our guys join the goras in castigating the Indian curators, so many poor pitch ratings in India home matches compared to SA, Eng. 

That is our fault if our commentators complain. Where is it written in the rule book that in Delhi we have to give them green tops.

hamare commentator number ek ke chewtiya hain.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Gollum said:

No role for spinners and Rohit. If the deck remains this green tomorrow and we are put into bat this will be my batting order:

 

1. Bhuvi

2. Ishant

3. Che

4. Parthiv

5. Vijay

6. Kohli

7. Rahane

8. Dhawan

9. Pandya

10. Karthik (wk)

11. Shami

 

Dhawan ahead of Karthick and Shami seriously ? 

Posted
13 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

India has never lost a Test at wanderers. It might all change this time.

The pitches weren't as green as this one if the reports are to believed. This team is down with every player playing for his spot except captain, which doesn't help matters at all.

 

3-0.

 

Can we fast forward to WC 2019. At least the FTBs will shine on some of the pattas in the league stages before getting a green mamba in the semis or finals. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...