Jump to content

10 overs per bowler limit in ODIS abolished - which team would benefit most ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Like Test matches if there is no quota of any kind to how much a single bowler can bowl in ODIS, which team would benefit most ?

 

50 overs - most teams would play 3 full time bowlers and maybe an all rounder. 
 

Break up being something like 20 10 10 10 where the top bowler like say Bumrah for India would bowl 3 spells of 7 6 7 for a total of 20 overs.

 

Pack the side with batsmen and play your 3 best bowlers and rest fill in.  
 

I think India and Australia would benefit most - if such a rule a rule came about.

 

I think green bros may benefit a great deal too.. Aamir and that tall bowler Afridi do donkeys work worth bowling and Pak pack their side with 2 extra sloggers 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Aiden said:

Alot of injured bowlers due to work load and missing test matches. 

Who cares- it is for each country’s resources to manage their work load and priorities.

 

i feel it will make odis  super exciting.

 

On one hand batting sides will be longer - on the other the longer batting sides due to format change  will face the Opposition best bowlers for the most part.

Posted (edited)

Will look good till we have bumrah at peak when we won't have good death bowler or good LOI bowler then will feel pretty useless rule to have. Btw with amout of useless bilaterals we play the workload for key bowlers will be too tough to handle.

Edited by Nikola
Posted
2 hours ago, Vickydev said:

Teams like Afghanistan which can keep churning mistery spinners, they can bowl these long spells and you can't play them out as a result.

Lol I am picturing 2 spinners bowling 25 overs each. Teams can fill their XI with good fielders and batters

Posted
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

The quota should be raised to 13 overs for ODIs and 5 overs for T20s.

 

This will allow teams to play 4 good bowlers and 7 good batsmen and cut out the bits and pieces guy.

 

And this will raise the quality of cricket.

+1

Posted

It will kill the All rounders. I am happy with the current rule.
necessity of 5 bowlers opens up lot of permutations and combinations.

Posted

I like the quota. that's what makes cricket a lot more strategic and challenging. 5 overs to go and you have 1 over from a weaker bowler, would you complete his quota or go for the kill etc etc all bring new dimension's to the game. One part of the game that doesn't need change.

Posted

Unfortunatley teams like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Sri Lanka will fill the teams with their spinners or bowling 3 spinners with 40 some overs and kill fast bowling when games are being played in subcontinent. 

 

I like the restriction to certain extent. Something long lines what expresss_bowling said, increase to about 12 or some overs for a fast bowler. 

Posted
12 hours ago, express bowling said:

The quota should be raised to 13 overs for ODIs and 5 overs for T20s.

 

This will allow teams to play 4 good bowlers and 7 good batsmen and cut out the bits and pieces guy.

 

And this will raise the quality of cricket.

That would change everything.No more need of bowlers who can bat also.

Posted
21 hours ago, express bowling said:

The quota should be raised to 13 overs for ODIs and 5 overs for T20s.

 

This will allow teams to play 4 good bowlers and 7 good batsmen and cut out the bits and pieces guy.

 

And this will raise the quality of cricket.

Nah this will also increase the overall scores as having 7 batsmen in the team means people can play with high rate right from the beginning without worrying about wickets 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...