Majestic Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Kapil Dev M 131, W 434, AVG 29.6 Southee M 94, W 367, AVG 29.1 I have categorised as fast bowler but they both are medium fast and known for their outswingers. coffee_rules, Rightarmfast and Trichromatic 1 1 1 Link to comment
zen Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Most of India’s top talents have equivalent or better option in top test playing countries. The players are mostly hyped by local fans as they lack options. Hardly anyone deserves to be in a world AT 11 if chosen from a neutral perspective. singhprakash72 1 Link to comment
Popular Post vvvslaxman Posted March 19 Popular Post Share Posted March 19 Absolutely not. Basic research would tell you that. Back then India lacked support seamers. Gulf between Kapil and second seamer of india was massive that Kapil had to bowl more overs than he was needed to. There was a match against West Indies he bowled 30 overs on the trot picking 9 for 83. When you bowl more overs with no support you end up conceding more runs per wicket than you are required to. He didn't really have Boult or Wagner to help him take load off of him. In Pakistan/Australia/Windies he was impacted by umpiring to boot with. We shouldn't be looking at raw stats. zaqw222222, sorak, nevada and 14 others 1 13 3 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 West Indies was the top side in the 1980s by some distance Performances against West Indies in the 1980s by bowlers sorak, f20143g70, AKane and 5 others 2 6 Link to comment
nevada Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Absolutely not. Basic research would tell you that. Back then India lacked support seamers. Gulf between Kapil and second seamer of india was massive that Kapil had to bowl more overs than he was needed to. There was a match against West Indies he bowled 30 overs on the trot picking 9 for 83. When you bowl more overs with no support you end up conceding more runs per wicket than you are required to. He didn't really have Boult or Wagner to help him take load off of him. In Pakistan/Australia/Windies he was impacted by umpiring to boot with. We shouldn't be looking at raw stats. Yup. He was strike bowler as well as stock bowler, bowling long spells. If Southee bowled 30 over spells, he would have probably broken down and not even played the number of matches he did. For sheer longevity and uninterrupted career alone, Kapil Dev deserves respect. raki05 1 Link to comment
Lord Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Southee plays mostly on green mambas but no one will even acknowledge it AuxiliA, SandeepMotta, express bowling and 3 others 1 5 Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 11 minutes ago, Lord said: Southee plays mostly on green mambas but no one will even acknowledge it Kapil wasn't successful in England. Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 3 hours ago, zen said: Most of India’s top talents have equivalent or better option in top test playing countries. The players are mostly hyped by local fans as they lack options. Hardly anyone deserves to be in a world AT 11 if chosen from a neutral perspective. Almost every neutral expert includes Gavaskar and Sachin in AT 11. Although I am not surprised by this post considering long history of dissing Indian players on ICF. express bowling and Stan AF 1 1 Link to comment
Number Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 He was 1.5 times better. Southee plays a lot of matches on seaming tracks while Kapil played a lot of matches not very helpful for fast bowling. Also the value Kapil added as a batsman was immense. He could tear apart any attack on his day. raki05 and Majestic 2 Link to comment
Lord Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 7 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: Kapil wasn't successful in England. Southee's been bad there too despite playing on similar wickets at home. raki05 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Idk about southee but point that he plays on green tracks. Well Kapil average in Eng is 39.18, In NZ it is 42.13 & SA it is 37.37 so just because he was swing bowler don't assume he would do well in every conditions. I think better comparison would be with richard hadlee cause he too did not have much support and had huge workload throughout his career and i think he was much better test player than kapil. Link to comment
Popular Post AuxiliA Posted March 19 Popular Post Share Posted March 19 4 hours ago, zen said: Most of India’s top talents have equivalent or better option in top test playing countries. The players are mostly hyped by local fans as they lack options. Hardly anyone deserves to be in a world AT 11 if chosen from a neutral perspective. A fanboi of Chhapri Pandya shouldn't be deriding bonafide legends like Kapil, Tendulkar, Gavaskar, etc. Stan AF, Suhaan, gattaca and 10 others 13 Link to comment
Adamant Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Kapil was better. Actually his average went down bcoz of his greed to break Hadlee's record. Also he had little support, if he had someone like Shami, he would have retired with a much better average and also higher impact. raki05 and sage 2 Link to comment
Lord Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 15 minutes ago, Adamant said: Kapil was better. Actually his average went down bcoz of his greed to break Hadlee's record. Also he had little support, if he had someone like Shami, he would have retired with a much better average and also higher impact. plus he had to give time to his batting too. raki05 1 Link to comment
Majestic Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 1 hour ago, Adamant said: Kapil was better. Actually his average went down bcoz of his greed to break Hadlee's record. Also he had little support, if he had someone like Shami, he would have retired with a much better average and also higher impact. I also felt the same but look at his year wise performance in last few years : 1991 - 25 1992- 29 1993- 26 1994- 27 1990- 47 1989-25 1988- 23 His worst years were 1984,1986,1987,1990. http://www.howstat.com/cricket/statistics/players/PlayerYears.asp?PlayerID=0443#bowl Link to comment
MultiB48 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 79 and 83 were his peak, nearly 150 wkts in those 2 years at 23. Link to comment
Gollum Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 If you go by raw stats, Ashwin and Jadeja are better than Warne then? Matlab kuch bhi? Texan, coffee_rules, Lord and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment
Lord Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 13 minutes ago, Gollum said: If you go by raw stats, Ashwin and Jadeja are better than Warne then? Matlab kuch bhi? stats matter only when they show Indians as inferior Gollum, Austin 3:!6, raki05 and 1 other 1 3 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 3 hours ago, Adamant said: Kapil was better. Actually his average went down bcoz of his greed to break Hadlee's record. Also he had little support, if he had someone like Shami, he would have retired with a much better average and also higher impact. It was also a case of Opposition playing him out. Once you see him off that's it. You have nothing of the same calibre to face against. raki05 and Adamant 2 Link to comment
Trichromatic Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 7 hours ago, Lord said: Southee's been bad there too despite playing on similar wickets at home. That's the point. Most players do better in home conditions. Srinath, Umesh Yadav, Shami, Ishant and many other fast bowlers have better records at home and have done little in helpful conditions away. So can't add this logic that Asian pacer did this Asia, so naturally they will be better in other conditions. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now