sandeep Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 14 minutes ago, jusarrived said: India wins or loses here is not important . He's at fault irrespective of the result +++1. Incompetence of greenbro batting shouldn't be used to hide Rohit's poor batting today. I still think he's our best ODI opener, but he really needs to address this issue with his batting. AK007, express bowling, sarcastic and 1 other 4
HippoSucks Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 A strike rate of 76 is good for an opener. Even Kohli was struggling in the middle overs.
Laaloo Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, HippoSucks said: A strike rate of 76 is good for an opener. Even Kohli was struggling in the middle overs. Gotta score faster if you play that many balls.. express bowling and Ultimate_Game 2
Lord Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 9 minutes ago, HippoSucks said: A strike rate of 76 is good for an opener. Even Kohli was struggling in the middle overs. Serious? Ultimate_Game and express bowling 2
maniac Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 I will put my hand and say wasn't an outstanding innings but not a poor innings as every one is making it out to be. In the context of the game was a decent knock. Interruptions didn't help.Rohit is a rhythm player and 2 times his rhythm was impacted. When he got the flow back he was runout. People crapping on this innings. Had we given the option where India would be before or during Rohit's innings,we would take it in a heartbeat
express bowling Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) Rohit should have scored 12 to 15 runs more, at the very least. SR of 76 is not acceptable after playing 119 balls on such a flat deck. I am not comfortable with this " I will accelerate only after I get my 100 " approach. Edited June 4, 2017 by express bowling Mosher, Cricketics, Laaloo and 3 others 6
Texan Posted June 4, 2017 Author Posted June 4, 2017 40 minutes ago, HippoSucks said: A strike rate of 76 is good for an opener. Even Kohli was struggling in the middle overs. Would be true in the 1990s. No more. 300 these days is more of a par total. On small grounds and flat decks, it is actually a little below par. Moreover we only got 300+ thanks to some superb hitting by Yuvraj, Hardik and later Kohli. They showed how flat the deck really was. Rohit is still likely our best ODI opener but the way he was struggling in the IPL shows he is terribly out of touch. And his knock today was a continuation of the struggle. Ultimate_Game and Gollum 2
maniac Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 Now putting into context,how important was his knock,sticking through overcast conditions and rain breaks sarcastic and nevada 2
vvvslaxman Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, maniac said: Now putting into context,how important was his knock,sticking through overcast conditions and rain breaks I am with you man on that although not overly happy about his around 28 to 33rd over. He was blocking the balls. Laaloo, sarcastic, maniac and 2 others 5
kubrickian Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 I said in the match thread that pitch is not exactly a belter. Its sort of a sticky surface where the ball was not coming on to the bat and its not easy to time the ball. Even Kohli found timing the ball difficult. Yuvraj is different because he is more of a power hitter and can bludgeon the ball despite the slow pace. Also the constant interruptions didnt help. 319 on that surface was a great effort and Rohit deserves credit for his contribution. sarcastic 1
King Tendulkar Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 If rohit sharma was a pak . Would be an atg , skipper and future prime minister adi B, randomGuy, maniac and 3 others 6
velu Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 3 hours ago, Pollack said: Rohit's approach may not work against better bowling attacks. sums up the state of current padosi bowling attack :P Pollack 1
Number Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 To be fair to him it was tough to get going with all those interruptions. His innings was solid barring first over and he did well to see off Aamir spell with the new ball. sarcastic 1
jusarrived Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 3 hours ago, King Tendulkar said: If rohit sharma was a pak . Would be an atg , skipper and future prime minister Him and Azhar Ali would make a good opening pair . I bet Rohit would still be playing the supporting role to Azhar .
veer Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 Lol.. Rohit just won ipl season... And we r blaming him for being slow... It's just a team strategy folks...
Cricketics Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 One other hand, great batting by Dhawan which not many talked about. Brilliant start given at a good strike rate. Rohit and Dhawan starting to look good together. Gollum 1
Temujin Khaghan Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 1 hour ago, Cricketics said: One other hand, great batting by Dhawan which not many talked about. Brilliant start given at a good strike rate. Rohit and Dhawan starting to look good together. He completely escaped amir's spell. He faced a spinner first up and that helped him settle down. Sparkling innings nonetheless. Cricketics 1
Temujin Khaghan Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Before the match started I was hoping for a 20(30) kind of innings from both openers because amir with the new ball was the sole danger in their entire team. I was confident kohli and dhoni would see off the middle overs and Uv, kedar and Hardik would take care of the final slog. More than happy with the way things went. Rohit could have slowed down before the second rain break as the drizzle was heavy and he did not want to get out.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now