Jump to content

Selecting Kohli in 2008 cost me my job - Vengsarkar


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

"Virat opened the innings against West Indies who had a few Test cricketers in their ranks, but we had none and in that match, Virat scored 123 not out. I felt that we should play this guy in the Indian team. I felt this was an ideal situation to include Kohli in the squad. Although the other four selectors agreed with my decision, Gary Kirsten and MS Dhoni were reluctant"

 

Describing why the debate between Badrinath and Kohli occurred, the 61-year-old said, “I knew that they were keen on keeping S Badrinath in the team because he was a Chennai Super Kings player. If Kohli would have come in, Badrinath would have been dropped. N Srinivasan was the BCCI treasurer at that time. He was upset that Badrinath was dropped because he was their player.”

 

http://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/ms-dhoni-gary-kirsten-were-reluctant-to-include-virat-kohli-in-indian-team-in-2008-dilip-vengsarkar/

Edited by Number
Posted

certain facts :

badrinath was not dropped 

virat scored century against nz

virat got a chance to open in that series,dhoni i rmember backed him throughout the series and i rememeber vividly he pushed him to receive the series trophy as well

 

so chewtiya news,move on 

Posted
2 hours ago, Number said:

 

Describing why the debate between Badrinath and Kohli occurred, the 61-year-old said, “I knew that they were keen on keeping S Badrinath in the team because he was a Chennai Super Kings player. If Kohli would have come in, Badrinath would have been dropped. N Srinivasan was the BCCI treasurer at that time. He was upset that Badrinath was dropped because he was their player.”

http://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/ms-dhoni-gary-kirsten-were-reluctant-to-include-virat-kohli-in-indian-team-in-2008-dilip-vengsarkar/

Looking back more than Dhoni, Srinivasan's role in this saga is murky.. 

Posted

Even if its true Badri was one of the start performers at that point in domestic , IIRC he was averaging close to 60 at one point ..so what exactly is wrong with giving him a few chances ? 

This is like today giving Mayank Agarwal a chance over shubnam gill , 10 years later just like the above case this may seem like a very bad call if Agwarwal fails and Shubnam turns out to be the next big thing .

Posted
22 minutes ago, jusarrived said:

Even if its true Badri was one of the start performers at that point in domestic , IIRC he was averaging close to 60 at one point ..so what exactly is wrong with giving him a few chances ? 

This is like today giving Mayank Agarwal a chance over shubnam gill , 10 years later just like the above case this may seem like a very bad call if Agwarwal fails and Shubnam turns out to be the next big thing .

Nothing wrong... its like we are upset with giving more chances to Rohit Sharma than Rahane

Posted
4 minutes ago, diga said:

Nothing wrong... its like we are upset with giving more chances to Rohit Sharma than Rahane

except that he wasnt given more chances and again Badri was better than rohit and Virat was not rahane back then 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, diga said:

Nothing wrong... its like we are upset with giving more chances to Rohit Sharma than Rahane

Badri who has a FC average of 54 , played  2 tests , 7 ODIs and 1 T20 for India .

Edited by jusarrived
Posted

If true this reveals the true character of Dhoni. Giving preference to your teammates over a more deserving player is nothing short of shameful.

Posted

Badrtinath had few issues, was a strokeless wonder who looked good at. Domestics but compketely out of place in Int cricket, he was selfish in his approach n not a team man also reason for that could be he had debuted at a older age n was scared to loose his place.

Posted

Badri was tried because of his good FC record. Didn't do well and immediately removed. Nothing fishy or creepy about it. People jump up and down once a deserved player from CSK gets selected into the team. Well, you can cry no more because Dhoni is no more the captain.

Posted

Dilip Vengsarkar believes he paid a hefty price - his job as chairman of selectors - for selecting a young Virat Kohli, Under-19 World Cup winner, ahead of S Badrinath, domestic stalwart, back in 2008. At an event to felicitate sports journalists, Vengsarkar accused N Srinivasan, the then BCCI treasurer, and then captain MS Dhoni of favouring the Chennai Super Kings and Tamil Nadu player Badrinath.

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22685033/selecting-virat-kohli-2008-cost-my-job-dilip-vengsarkar

 

It's about time someone spoke against the crook Srinivasan and his damad. 

Posted

Been shouting about this for years. Even cited supporting evidence from Amarnath but his testimony was unfairly discredited by CSK chamchas. No doubt chamchas will be out to discredit another legend of Indian cricket, in the name of protecting brand value. lol at Dhoni chamchas for trying to give Dhoni credit for bringing Kohli into the side and nurturing him. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...