Jump to content

Rob Key on Sky Sports: "The pitch is not fit for Test cricket"


sage

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, MultiB48 said:

Spin always pisses them off :hehe:,no issues when trundlers like Sam Curran and Darren Stevens gets wickets.

When a chutiya bowler like Colin de grandhomme and chotu Karan not Curran can get wickets on seaming green grasslands it's all good. 

Posted (edited)

Yes ,i admit had it been our attack featuring all the first choice bowlers i too would have preferred a pitch where pacers also had something to cheer about but i didn't fail to understand India are on verge of making to the WTC finals and yes they were little apprehensive about their chances against their bogey team without their main men(bowlers),they couldn't have botched this chance, I don't find Clown wrong here to win it desperately and lead us in Lords after Rahane and his injured warriors tamed Aussie bulls at their backyard and put him under tremendous pressure ,it only helps us go more closer to the finals

Lets cherish the moment, saviour the moment,just enjoy and sit with popcorn and enjoy this sissy whining from the English

Edited by Suhaan
Posted (edited)

Wickets of Crawley and Bairstow are classic examples of how ill prepared the Englishmen are , both missed a straightforward arm ball which would go down against poor technique, nothing to do with the pitch here. There were no demons in the pitch, no extra bounce of the length, no missing the face of the bat kind of turn, if anything the pink ball skidded more than the regular red ball and that led to the downfall of batsman on both the sides, even Kohli Rahane, etc were late on their shots and  perished due to that extra zip, so no, this is just poor technique on both the side and nothing to do with the Pitch. Rohit is the only batsman who read the pitch perfectly and was making an effort to play forward and not to stay back on the back foot and be a sitting duck. 

Edited by Sean Bradley
Posted (edited)

The only thing to be blamed rightfully is the pink ball. It skids through and when you dont play enough with it , it shows. Also SG Pink ball skids lot faster than kookaburra because it has an extra coat of lacquer because

of Indian conditions and pitches..


But remember both teams played with the same ball. They lost 20 wickets we lost 10.. which leads to the question..who was more skilled in batting.. and hats off to Rohit..

Edited by neel roy
Posted
Just now, neel roy said:

The only thing to be blamed rightfully is the pink ball. It skids through and when you dont play enough with it , it shows. Also SG Pink ball skids lot faster than kookaburra because it has an extra coat of lacquer because

of Indian conditions and pitches..

Wouldn't they have practices with it in the week leading up to the match?  Or is that not enough preparation?

Posted
2 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

Wouldn't they have practices with it in the week leading up to the match?  Or is that not enough preparation?


Issue is India can practice against Axar Ashwin and still they struggled. England practices against Bess and Leach and Jiten Patel..

Posted
7 hours ago, SK_IH said:

 

It started with Virat. Finally he acted like a leader indirectly defending pitch. For a change I loved his post match interview.

Posted
3 hours ago, putrevus said:

I agree but tbf India should prepare pitches that are conducive to spin and reverse swing friendly. Like the ones vs South Africa. Little help but not too much. 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Jay said:

I agree but tbf India should prepare pitches that are conducive to spin and reverse swing friendly. Like the ones vs South Africa. Little help but not too much. 

I think we would have seen pitch like first test for rest of the tests too, if they had not lost first test.Nadeem who played first test was just awful.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
15 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I think we would have seen pitch like first test for rest of the tests too, if they had not lost first test.Nadeem who played first test was just awful.

NhA first test was ****. Too toss dependant. 

 

Need flatter pitches with help for spin but not too much. Help for reverse swing. 

 

England are lucky no Umesh Shami and Jadeja though.

 

I think that's why India prepared such turning pitches. 

Posted
8 hours ago, SK_IH said:

 

Rohit is right. If only 2-3 more batsmen from our side and 1-2 from England had shown similar application, the scores would have been much higher. I thought Root would grit out a 50 and Stokes would play a blinder to take the game away from us but they folded like cheap tents instead, having made up their minds that hard work in the dustry fields of India is beneath them. Root picked 3 pacers on a pitch where spin was going to be the main factor. There is no criticism whatsoever about this elementary blunder. Stokes, after a blistering knock on an easy first innings pitch in the first game, has gone AWOL with his batting and his bowling is also a non factor. There is no criticism of him either. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...