Jay Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 32 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Spin always pisses them off ,no issues when trundlers like Sam Curran and Darren Stevens gets wickets. When a chutiya bowler like Colin de grandhomme and chotu Karan not Curran can get wickets on seaming green grasslands it's all good. adi B, raki05 and nitinbwj 1 1 1
nitinbwj Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 Rohit absolutely trolled everyone in the press conference that it was east peasy to bat on. Just required concentration adi B, express bowling, SK_IH and 2 others 5
Suhaan Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 (edited) Yes ,i admit had it been our attack featuring all the first choice bowlers i too would have preferred a pitch where pacers also had something to cheer about but i didn't fail to understand India are on verge of making to the WTC finals and yes they were little apprehensive about their chances against their bogey team without their main men(bowlers),they couldn't have botched this chance, I don't find Clown wrong here to win it desperately and lead us in Lords after Rahane and his injured warriors tamed Aussie bulls at their backyard and put him under tremendous pressure ,it only helps us go more closer to the finals Lets cherish the moment, saviour the moment,just enjoy and sit with popcorn and enjoy this sissy whining from the English Edited February 25, 2021 by Suhaan nitinbwj, Gollum, raki05 and 1 other 1 1 2
coffee_rules Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 (edited) Say this to Rob bi-smi llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīmi (بِسْمِ ٱللَّٰهِ ٱلرَّحْمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ) First of all, thanks to Allah, our poyzz played well! Edited February 26, 2021 by coffee_rules Suhaan, Chalks, raki05 and 1 other 1 3
neel roy Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 Winning toss ( 11th out of last 13 matches against India) then being 74/2 and then next 18 wickets lost for 119 runs. Stop blaming pitch and blame your skill against spinners.. raki05, nitinbwj and TheWall 2 1
Sean Bradley Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 (edited) Wickets of Crawley and Bairstow are classic examples of how ill prepared the Englishmen are , both missed a straightforward arm ball which would go down against poor technique, nothing to do with the pitch here. There were no demons in the pitch, no extra bounce of the length, no missing the face of the bat kind of turn, if anything the pink ball skidded more than the regular red ball and that led to the downfall of batsman on both the sides, even Kohli Rahane, etc were late on their shots and perished due to that extra zip, so no, this is just poor technique on both the side and nothing to do with the Pitch. Rohit is the only batsman who read the pitch perfectly and was making an effort to play forward and not to stay back on the back foot and be a sitting duck. Edited February 25, 2021 by Sean Bradley nitinbwj, Sandeep99 and BacktoCricaddict 1 2
neel roy Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 (edited) The only thing to be blamed rightfully is the pink ball. It skids through and when you dont play enough with it , it shows. Also SG Pink ball skids lot faster than kookaburra because it has an extra coat of lacquer because of Indian conditions and pitches.. But remember both teams played with the same ball. They lost 20 wickets we lost 10.. which leads to the question..who was more skilled in batting.. and hats off to Rohit.. Edited February 25, 2021 by neel roy nitinbwj and BacktoCricaddict 1 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 Just now, neel roy said: The only thing to be blamed rightfully is the pink ball. It skids through and when you dont play enough with it , it shows. Also SG Pink ball skids lot faster than kookaburra because it has an extra coat of lacquer because of Indian conditions and pitches.. Wouldn't they have practices with it in the week leading up to the match? Or is that not enough preparation?
neel roy Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Wouldn't they have practices with it in the week leading up to the match? Or is that not enough preparation? Issue is India can practice against Axar Ashwin and still they struggled. England practices against Bess and Leach and Jiten Patel.. nitinbwj 1
putrevus Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-tour-of-england-and-ireland-2015-743911/england-vs-australia-4th-investec-test-743969/full-scorecard How is this fair pitch. You win the toss and just win the match. nitinbwj and Real McCoy 1 1
asterix Posted February 25, 2021 Posted February 25, 2021 Crawley & Bairstow getting out to Axar in the first over had nothing to do with pitch. They just batted badly. Most of the wickets England lost was due to bad batting and not the pitch... nitinbwj and express bowling 2
jf1gp_1 Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 7 hours ago, SK_IH said: It started with Virat. Finally he acted like a leader indirectly defending pitch. For a change I loved his post match interview.
jf1gp_1 Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 (edited) duplicate Edited February 26, 2021 by jf1gp_1
Jay Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 3 hours ago, putrevus said: https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-tour-of-england-and-ireland-2015-743911/england-vs-australia-4th-investec-test-743969/full-scorecard How is this fair pitch. You win the toss and just win the match. I agree but tbf India should prepare pitches that are conducive to spin and reverse swing friendly. Like the ones vs South Africa. Little help but not too much. express bowling 1
putrevus Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Jay said: I agree but tbf India should prepare pitches that are conducive to spin and reverse swing friendly. Like the ones vs South Africa. Little help but not too much. I think we would have seen pitch like first test for rest of the tests too, if they had not lost first test.Nadeem who played first test was just awful. Edited February 26, 2021 by putrevus
Jay Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 15 minutes ago, putrevus said: I think we would have seen pitch like first test for rest of the tests too, if they had not lost first test.Nadeem who played first test was just awful. NhA first test was ****. Too toss dependant. Need flatter pitches with help for spin but not too much. Help for reverse swing. England are lucky no Umesh Shami and Jadeja though. I think that's why India prepared such turning pitches.
nevada Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 8 hours ago, SK_IH said: Rohit is right. If only 2-3 more batsmen from our side and 1-2 from England had shown similar application, the scores would have been much higher. I thought Root would grit out a 50 and Stokes would play a blinder to take the game away from us but they folded like cheap tents instead, having made up their minds that hard work in the dustry fields of India is beneath them. Root picked 3 pacers on a pitch where spin was going to be the main factor. There is no criticism whatsoever about this elementary blunder. Stokes, after a blistering knock on an easy first innings pitch in the first game, has gone AWOL with his batting and his bowling is also a non factor. There is no criticism of him either. SK_IH, nitinbwj, coffee_rules and 1 other 2 2
coffee_rules Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 The Lord’s pitch when India plays there on WTC final kohli, AuxiliA, Suhaan and 1 other 4
Frustrated Posted February 26, 2021 Posted February 26, 2021 https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/india-vs-england-ind-don-t-complain-about-playing-on-green-decks-says-graeme-swann-on-pitch-criticism-101614304614455.html. Swann is spot on. nevada and kirkutfan 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now