Time to move on from Baggage Bhuvaneshwar?

[King6]

No. Still he is our good bowler in death

[New guy]

22 minutes ago, nitinbwj said:

Ain’t no Mark wood. I would always prefer speed. 

Jordan did great too. Bhuvi isn't the problem, we can play with 2, 3 pacers like we used to before, can't understand this meek strategy 

[New guy]

2 hours ago, nitinbwj said:

He is harmless. Doesn’t look like picking any wickets and opposition can score 35 runs easily without taking any risks.

He hasn't given 35 runs a single time this series 

[express bowling]

Bhuvi contains runs

 

But does not pick enough wickets.

 

He has 42 wickets from 46 T20Is ... not even 1 wicket per match.

 

These days, picking wickets is the only way to have a high win % in LOIs.

[putrevus]

Bhuvi should be shown door to a bowler who might leak more runs but picks up wickets. There is no wicket taking ability in Bhuvi. Only way you slown down other teams is by taking wickets. He takes less than a wicket per match which is disgraceful for an opening bowler who also happens to bowl at death.

 

Yesterday was classic, there was swing on offer but his line was so wrong that he had no chance of picking up wickets.I am glad this guy has been kicked out of test team.He needs to be kicked out from all formats.Let him play IPL.

Edited March 17, 2021 by putrevus

[ShoonyaSifar]

In his last 20 matches, 14 wicket@39 but as he is the Captain's Clown's favourite, he comes back to the side immediately after injuries. He stopped being a good T20 bowler back in 2017. Has been terrible since then even in IPL. But the clown refuses to see the reality. 

Edited March 17, 2021 by ShoonyaSifar

[rkt.india]

4 hours ago, express bowling said:

Bhuvi contains runs

 

But does not pick enough wickets.

 

He has 42 wickets from 46 T20Is ... not even 1 wicket per match.

 

These days, picking wickets is the only way to have a high win % in LOIs.

You do need one such economic bowler but problem is with our team composition. England only playing one spinner, we play two. We are only playing on two specialist medium pacers on a bouncy pitch and both lack pace and bounce. I don't like Pandya as our third seamer. They need a good third seamer. They need to give Sundar more responsibility as a batsman. We don't need Iyer. It allows us to play third seamer.

 

Kishan

Rohit

Rahul

Kohli

Pant

Pandya

Sundar

Shardul/any other seamer

Chahal

BK

Bumrah

[Clarke]

Bring back Oomesh Yadav, he Oozes wicket taking kaanfidence 

[express bowling]

1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

You do need one such economic bowler but problem is with our team composition. England only playing one spinner, we play two. We are only playing on two specialist medium pacers on a bouncy pitch and both lack pace and bounce. I don't like Pandya as our third seamer. They need a good third seamer. They need to give Sundar more responsibility as a batsman. We don't need Iyer. It allows us to play third seamer.

 

Kishan

Rohit

Rahul

Kohli

Pant

Pandya

Sundar

Shardul/any other seamer

Chahal

BK

Bumrah

 

 

We need to find 2 more quick pacers who are apt for white ball cricket and can take wickets too. And preferably tall ones.

 

Bumrah can't be our only good white ball quick bowler ... he needs rest + injuries can happen.

 

Let's say during an Important ICC tournament Bumrah has a niggle.  Do we want to depend on 3 trundlers bowling in tandem !!

 

Moreover, I prefer 2 Quick bowlers plus 1 Swing bowler combo in white ball cricket  ( all 3 quick bowlers in tests unless playing in Eng / NZ )

 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

13 hours ago, Clarke said:

Bring back Oomesh Yadav, he Oozes wicket taking kaanfidence 

 

Sir darr ka mohall hoga ...apni hi team men fir to 

[Moochad]

Can't take a call on him until after ipl tamasha. If he regains form he can be in consideration, but I liked natarajan or chahar for the trundler quota last season

[beetle]

[zen]

@Global.Baba has courage to be usually wrong

[Sean Bradley]

Gobar Baba 

 

Edited March 20, 2021 by Sean Bradley

[speed_thrills]

Notwithstanding this performance baggage should be offloaded. I mean how embarrassing is that other teams have someone like Wood steaming in and we have baggage ambling across.

[cowboysfan]

has there been a poster who has been more wrong on all his posts than Global baba?.he is not just wrong but  the exact opposite happens from what he predicts .

[Jay]

3 hours ago, Cricspin said:

Wow, So Many people think Bhubaneswar should be kicked out of the T20 side. 

 

As if we have 5 Pat Cummins kind of bowler just waiting out there to replace him.

 

How the heck is economy not important in a T20. If you do not score enough runs you lose. No matter how many wickets you lose in your innings. 130/2 is a worse T20 total than 170/8. If all bowlers keep it tight the opposition will find it hard to win matches.

 

Wickets column can be deceiving. It does matter when you are picking those wickets. Cheap wickets at the end when batsmen are going for it wont help the team much. for example 2/38 in 4 overs can look decent for not when a bowler got 2 free wickets in his last over. who are these wicket taking express speed demonic bowlers that are being kept out because Bhubaneswar gets to play.  Bumrah and Shami were both out this series.

 

To me he bowled very well this series.

As if pat is even as good as Bhuvi in non Aussie Condtions in T20. 

[Khota]

Can you imagine having 5 proper bowlers today.

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 hours ago, cowboysfan said:

has there been a poster who has been more wrong on all his posts than Global baba?.he is not just wrong but  the exact opposite happens from what he predicts .

He calls it acuman we call it panauti 

[Yoda-esque]

Cute thread